Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well he's listed as a billionaire. Either way, millionaire or billionaire you still have to know your shit to make money.
I wouldn't trust Clinton to guard the fucking sugar bowl. If you do then you are a bigger idiot they everyone thinks you are. Fool.
Provide a link for the $300 million (which ain't bad!); and that Trumps lies 3 times more than Clinton!You don't become a billionaire by being lousy at business especially when its business that makes you those billions.
Psst...did Trump tell you that? Because all independent analysis I've ever seen puts his worth at around 300 million...
There are actual people out there that track integrity - it's called Factcheck and Trump says pants-on-fire BS 70% of the time, which is 3 times more frequently than Clinton.
So by this more or less objective measure Trump is far less trustworthy than Clinton.
Show me the link that proves Trump SIMPLY invested in mutual funds (mutual funds! lmao!!) and made more on those little mutual funds than he did as a builder and businessman. Don't ignore this request! Your credibility depends on it!Well he's listed as a billionaire. Either way, millionaire or billionaire you still have to know your shit to make money.
Psst...he was born a millionaire and if he simply invested in a mutual funds his inheritance it would be worth more than all his spinning and dealing businessmanning.
I wouldn't trust Clinton to guard the fucking sugar bowl. If you do then you are a bigger idiot they everyone thinks you are. Fool.
And I wouldn't trust you, so who cares.
Show me the link that proves Trump SIMPLY invested in mutual funds (mutual funds! lmao!!) and made more on those little mutual funds than he did as a builder and businessman. Don't ignore this request! Your credibility depends on it!
You lose. Each of those entities that are "tied up" are income generators. It is not certain how much income they are generating. The fact that Trump DID NOT merely invest but worked to build an empire should be proof to you that he knows what he is doing in property, building and other management.Show me the link that proves Trump SIMPLY invested in mutual funds (mutual funds! lmao!!) and made more on those little mutual funds than he did as a builder and businessman. Don't ignore this request! Your credibility depends on it!
Trump Worth $10 Billion Less Than If He’d Simply Invested in Index Funds
I was wrong on him not being a billionaire, though not wrong on him constantly embellishing (aka lying) what he is worth.
300 million is his cash, rest is tied up.
I'd call it a draw. Both will say and do whatever they need to win and both have examples of competence and incompetence. "Integrity" and "competency" are important but what actions they'll take as president are the more important and for me that is HRC.And is integrity important to the person who holds the highest office?
I happen to think "integrity" and "competency" are the foundation of a good president.
I also say that it is being proven that Clinton fails in both respects.
I respect your opinion. However, to me, the integrity and competence I do not feel is a draw. Clinton was part of the dealings with foreign countries where we lost the admiration of allies all over the globe. She proved her incompetence when foreign leaders refused to meet with her and not calling our Ambassadors out of Libya when all other nations recalled theirs.I'd call it a draw. Both will say and do whatever they need to win and both have examples of competence and incompetence. "Integrity" and "competency" are important but what actions they'll take as president are the more important and for me that is HRC.And is integrity important to the person who holds the highest office?
I happen to think "integrity" and "competency" are the foundation of a good president.
I also say that it is being proven that Clinton fails in both respects.
You lose.
Each of those entities that are "tied up" are income generators. It is not certain how much income they are generating. The fact that Trump DID NOT merely invest but worked to build an empire should be proof to you that he knows what he is doing in property, building and other management.
Well he's listed as a billionaire. Either way, millionaire or billionaire you still have to know your shit to make money.
Psst...he was born a millionaire and if he simply invested his inheritance into a mutual fund it would be worth more today than all his spinning and dealing businessmanning has managed to produce.
I wouldn't trust Clinton to guard the fucking sugar bowl. If you do then you are a bigger idiot they everyone thinks you are. Fool.
And I wouldn't trust you, so who cares.
I wouldn't trust you either
I don't believe all candidates gave up their financial disclosures until they are the nominee.You lose.
lame much?
Each of those entities that are "tied up" are income generators. It is not certain how much income they are generating. The fact that Trump DID NOT merely invest but worked to build an empire should be proof to you that he knows what he is doing in property, building and other management.
It is not certain because Trump wouldn't even release his tax returns as all modern candidates for presidency did.
That should give you some indication how trustworthy this character is.
Trump does more or less know what he is doing in his branding business, he has been at it for a while but his successes are also mixed in with many failures.
But beyond that is track record of shady dealing and mis-representation and how he watches his failed projects crash and burn mostly from the comfort of the golden parachutes he sets up for himself personally, as he escapes responsibility.
I wouldn't trust you either
Fine by me. But come election day you'll have to trust the result.
I don't believe all candidates gave up their financial disclosures until they are the nominee.
Many failures? What is his ratio of successes to failures? Is it 100 to 1? You do know he has made hundreds of deals with four apparent failures?
Tell me more about the golden parachutes he sets up for himself as he escapes culpability.
In you next post, be sure you cite that you are talking about Trump. When talking about "escaping responsibility," one might think you are alluding to the Clintons.
I see the lying as a draw since Trump speaks off the cuff and just repeats or re-tweets what he's heard. Once called out he is incapable of admitting he's been wrong (e.g., meeting Putin and Muslims celebrating 9/11). HRC is just a lousy politician who feels she needs to give everything the best possible spin.I respect your opinion. However, to me, the integrity and competence I do not feel is a draw. Clinton was part of the dealings with foreign countries where we lost the admiration of allies all over the globe. She proved her incompetence when foreign leaders refused to meet with her and not calling our Ambassadors out of Libya when all other nations recalled theirs.
I feel her lying is pathological and can't be endured as president.
And is integrity important to the person who holds the highest office?
I happen to think "integrity" and "competency" are the foundation of a good president.
I also say that it is being proven that Clinton fails in both respects.
I see the lying as a draw since Trump speaks off the cuff and just repeats or re-tweets what he's heard. Once called out he is incapable of admitting he's been wrong (e.g., meeting Putin and Muslims celebrating 9/11). HRC is just a lousy politician who feels she needs to give everything the best possible spin.I respect your opinion. However, to me, the integrity and competence I do not feel is a draw. Clinton was part of the dealings with foreign countries where we lost the admiration of allies all over the globe. She proved her incompetence when foreign leaders refused to meet with her and not calling our Ambassadors out of Libya when all other nations recalled theirs.
I feel her lying is pathological and can't be endured as president.
The competence thing is also a draw. Trump certainly did well in business and has also done well as a celebrity, putting his name on just about anything. He has also had some bankruptcies and lawsuits. Many who choose to follow him into business lost big. HRC certainly has a long history of questionable judgments, going back to her attempt a health care reform. On the other hand, she generally gets high marks for her time in the Senate. And let's not forget the position is for a CIC and not a CEO and she has much more experience than Trump.
Is she really as incompetent as all that or has she been living under a GOP microscope for the last 40 years? How bad was Benghazi or the email server or any of the other "scandals" if the dozens of GOP investigations over the years essentially found little dirt. Do you think Trump or anyone else would look any better after such scrutiny?Well all the experience you seem to think she has means nothing when she's as incompetent as she is.
Benghazi and her e-mails show just how incompetent she is. Yup. She'd make a great incompetent POTUS. Just what we need. LOL
Benghazi and her e-mails show just how incompetent she is.
Is she really as incompetent as all that or has she been living under a GOP microscope for the last 40 years? How bad was Benghazi or the email server or any of the other "scandals" if the dozens of GOP investigations over the years essentially found little dirt. Do you think Trump or anyone else would look any better after such scrutiny?Well all the experience you seem to think she has means nothing when she's as incompetent as she is.
Benghazi and her e-mails show just how incompetent she is. Yup. She'd make a great incompetent POTUS. Just what we need. LOL
