- Banned
- #201
You need helpSo does that mean you support eliminating the 2nd Amendment or not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need helpSo does that mean you support eliminating the 2nd Amendment or not?
20,000+ gun laws don't address the issue?Rocks can’t do what modern firearms do. You address the issue when the need arises. Generally, we don’t make laws when no one is violating a behavior we don’t condone as a society..
That’s not a deflection. You’re just super defensive.Deflection noted.
The Constitution doesn't allow you to vote away the 2nd Amendment. We already understand that you oppose the 2nd Amendment. The rest of us would like you to go fuck yourself.I condone them for only people I want to have them. That’s my right as a voter and what the constitution allows.
Which of those 20,000 laws would have prevented this incident?20,000+ gun laws don't address the issue?
Not asking for it.Don’t need your permission
Asking you to clarify your response means I need help?You need help
Sadly, that’s where a lot of the problem comes in. People not doing their rather simple job of updating databases or reporting red flag notices that come across their desk. If some people would just do their job properly, a lot of these incidents would never occur.It's like the thug who had a disqualifying record from his time in the Air Force but some clerk forgot to put it into his official file. He went on to shoot up a church in Texas.
No to what you clown? I'm not suggesting that as soon as you make a threat online a force field should manifest and block you from your rifle. People who make threats, either in person or online should have those instances documented by the site they made them on, that information should be forwarded to the police and the police should be able to use that information to get a court order to seize any weapons that person may own as well as add them to list of people prohibited from purchasing firearms.Nope. Some kind of court action is required.
Duh, again??? Handguns are used for murder much more than rifles.More times than not? That‘s not accurate. The majority of hand gun owners are not murdering people with them.
Correct.Duh, again??? Handguns are used for murder much more than rifles.
You wrote "when an 18 year old kid purchases two AR 15's a red flag should be raised". What is that mechanism for raising that flag?When I bought my guns I had to list my date of birth... No database needed....
Until he was ineligible to own one there wasn’t anything anyone could have done…I'm pro 2A. But I don't support whacko's having the right to buy a gun. In the other thread I started, meant to just have a conversation, so many retards saying "shall not be infringed," didn't seem to have a clue as to what having a conversation even meant.
Those are the right wing radicals that would support someone like Ramos and his "right to keep and bear arms." Which is a total slap in the face for Americans who lost loved ones due to gun violence. Yall should be ashamed.
No you won't. Our 20,000+ gun laws prove it.I’ll believe it when something is done.
The election was neither free nor fair.The Nazis were elected to power, moron.
You're the one who is confused. Genuine rights can't be voted away.
No to what you clown? I'm not suggesting that as soon as you make a threat online a force field should manifest and block you from your rifle. People who make threats, either in person or online should have those instances documented by the site they made them on, that information should be forwarded to the police and the police should be able to use that information to get a court order to seize any weapons that person may own as well as add them to list of people prohibited from purchasing firearms.
Hindsight is always the best sight. If Ramos was not a crazy fuck I would support his right to buy a gun. The problem with your question is it comes after the fact and ignores all of the red flags that arose around this kid. There were plenty of indications that this kid was a rotter and all got ignored. He foretold what he was going to do. There were also a lot of other things that contributed to this slaughter. A teacher propped a door open allowing easy access by the perp. 911 calls by the kids (during the shooting) were not transferred to the 19 cops in the hallway that assumed all kids were dead and they were dealing with just a hostage situation. No armed security on campus as well.I'm pro 2A. But I don't support whacko's having the right to buy a gun. In the other thread I started, meant to just have a conversation, so many retards saying "shall not be infringed," didn't seem to have a clue as to what having a conversation even meant.
Those are the right wing radicals that would support someone like Ramos and his "right to keep and bear arms." Which is a total slap in the face for Americans who lost loved ones due to gun violence. Yall should be ashamed.
Yes, since it is his right.It's a simple question, people. Do you support Ramos's right to buy, keep and bear arms?
Ineffective gun laws.No you won't. Our 20,000+ gun laws prove it.
What the fuck did you think I was implying originally?In other words, you also believe some kind of court action is required.
What a fucking dumbass.