DukeU
Diamond Member
None. And any new laws won't either. The point.Which of those 20,000 laws would have prevented this incident?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None. And any new laws won't either. The point.Which of those 20,000 laws would have prevented this incident?
Your fellow Republicans disagree. They believe in raising the age limit for long guns to 21.None. And any new laws won't either. The point.
It was the largest party in Germany. All the other parties were also "minority parties." The law did not require the Nazis to win a majority to have Hitler appointed as chancellor.The election was neither free nor fair.
It was a minority party….
The Nazis secured 43.9% of the vote, the Nazis still did not command a majority in the Reichstag.
The Enabling Law
On the 23 March 1933, Hitler proposed the Enabling Law to the Reichstag. This new law gave Hitler the power to rule by decree rather than passing laws through the Reichstag and the president. If passed, the law established the conditions needed for dictatorial rule
kind of silly. Only federal laws are nation wide are universal laws. Totaling up all the laws of every state, county and town is silly when all you live in is one of each . Only Fed and those in your state, city, county are relevantNo you won't. Our 20,000+ gun laws prove it.
You mean like abolishing the 2nd Amendment?Ineffective gun laws.
We can’t pass anything that is effective at preventing mass shootings.
Correct.
And rifles are used more for mass shootings.
I'm not a gun owner but I have bought ammo so I'd be in there too I'd guess.If there was a national database, I'd be in it. In time, my file would be covered in so much dust, it wouldn't even matter. Because I can pass a psych exam. I qualify for an AR or just about any over the counter gun. And I'm proud of that fact. I even bragged about getting my permit (years ago). So my file would never even be opened.
It was like proving I wasn't a mental case. Not that I had to prove anything to anyone except myself. But it's a good feeling knowing that you haven't screwed up your life so much that you can't even carry a pistol.
Sorry...all my guns were destroyed in a fire.So you support a national database of guns and their owners? Agreed.
Don’t need to. Maybe you didn’t know that. Even the Heller decision allows for permitting handgun owners and firearm registration. What else do you need for all firearms.The Constitution doesn't allow you to vote away the 2nd Amendment. We already understand that you oppose the 2nd Amendment. The rest of us would like you to go fuck yourself.
Your fellow Republicans disagree. They believe in raising the age limit for long guns to 21.
I don't assume progs have common sense.What the fuck did you think I was implying originally?
I’m concerned that they are eligible.I'm not a gun owner but I have bought ammo so I'd be in there too I'd guess.
My thing on gun control is that if I see someone carrying a gun I'd like to know they know how and when to use it. No different from seeing a driver on the street.
I don't believe it does. Who says so?Don’t need to. Maybe you didn’t know that. Even the Heller decision allows for permitting handgun owners and firearm registration. What else do you need for all firearms.
The old common sense argument. Is that the same common sense that you humpers of Trump used to suggest the Guard be activated for rioters and shoot them in the legs ?I don't assume progs have common sense.
Rambunctious might disagree. He(?) wants a red flag law to keep guns away from potential mass murders and a national database is the only way I know to make that happen. He doesn't support mass murder, do you? Do you have an alternative solution?No. The 2nd Amendment doesn't give government the authority to keep tabs on you for exercising it. Precisely the opposite is the case.
It’s not a ”who”. It’s the conservative opinion. Then you didn’t read the Heller decision.I don't believe it does. Who says so?
AYE, cant make up this much stupid in one sitting.I'm pro 2A. But I don't support whacko's having the right to buy a gun. In the other thread I started, meant to just have a conversation, so many retards saying "shall not be infringed," didn't seem to have a clue as to what having a conversation even meant.
Those are the right wing radicals that would support someone like Ramos and his "right to keep and bear arms." Which is a total slap in the face for Americans who lost loved ones due to gun violence. Yall should be ashamed.
kind of silly. Only federal laws are nation wide are universal laws. Totaling up all the laws of every state, county and town is silly when all you live in is one of each . Only Fed and those in your state, city, county are relevant
There isn't a shred of evidence that Trump ever said that.The old common sense argument. Is that the same common sense that you hero Trump used to suggest the Guard be activated for rioters and shoot them in the legs ?