🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Who is More Offensive? Kelly or Trump?

Who is More Offensive? Kelly or Trump?

  • Meghan Kelly

    Votes: 10 62.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 6 37.5%

  • Total voters
    16
^^^^^^^^^

Just in case anyone missed that you have an IQ<40.....

I don't take laugher seriously, he says some really stupid shit. Half the time he makes no sense. I think he is on some heavy meds.

You do? Which meds?

You are almost coherent on that post.

Look at you! Going for the vague generalities. Let's have a discussion genius. What would you like to talk about? Wow me.

You are the one that can move off of you and your addiction issues.

Say what? That was less than coherent. Would you like to try again?
 
Republicans and Republican posers are arguing about which offensive person is more offensive that the other. Kelly has been bitching about liberals and Obama the whole time she has been at her job at FOX. That is her job at FOX. Trump has been an offensive fool for decades.

trumpthemovie.com
 
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.
 
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

You were not honest about what Meghan Kelly said in that interview with Howard Stern. One of two things happened Either the video was edited or you heard the following which I am posting here from a 2010 transcript of the interview. Now I posted the video and I did click it to see that the video was working but I am not listening to Howard Stern so I didn't listen to the interview - I can see clearly that you left out the truth about what she said - you'll just have to admit that Kelly had no room to talk about Trump after talking like this on Howard Stern's Radio Show:

Megyn Kelly talks dirty - On Media - POLITICO.com

April 20, 2010
Categories:

Megyn Kelly talks dirty
Fox News' Megyn Kelly holds a special place in the hearts of Washingtonians. She cut her chops here, working at WJLA and Fox News. She loves Bill Sammon (and John Mayer loves her). She likes food. She's taken on Britney. She can yell. And she's a Taylor Hicks fan.

She's also willing to talk to Howard Stern, which she did today. And, as might be expected, the talk got dirty.

Topics followed expected lines when dealing with Stern: her legs, pre-marital sex, when she lost her virginity, her sex life with her husband, sex in the TV news business, and, of course, porn.

The show summary after the jump...

>UPDATE: Kelly addressed feedback to her Stern appearance at the end of her afternoon show Tuesday and read some viewer emails. "Megyn, I thought you had more integrity and class." "I heard your interview on Howard Stern. Your cred went way up with me. You get him and you're comfortable with yourself to talk about your life without being inappropriate."

Before Kelly walks in:

Howard: "The reason she's here is because she's the hottest TV person I've seen in a long time."

Robin Quivers: "And she's promoting that!"

Howard: "I just want to see a hot chick." Adding: "She is the hottest newscaster. ... I feel a little nervous Robin."

Kelly walks in:

"Baby, look at you..."

Highlights:

H: "Are you attracted to my wife at all? ... Have you been with another woman?"

M: "I can honestly say I haven't. ... Maybe [Howard's wife] will be the first. ... I'm into guys."

M: "I'm not into porn."

H: Have you always had a boyfriend?

K: "Pretty much. ... Maybe it's an insecurity thing. ... I do need a little attention. I like to be adored."

K: "They Fox-ify you over at Fox News. ... Fox is full of beauties. ... They're all beautiful, honestly."

H: What happens to you at Fox News when a woman gets ugly?

K: "They take you down to the basement, beat you and kick you out the door. ... No! ... I mean, honestly, it's TV. It's a fickle business. ... I do feel pressure to look my best."

K: "I believe what Kevin Bacon said: Keep the fights clean and the sex dirty and you have happy marriage."

K: "They say that newscasters often get stalked more than celebrities because you're looking right in the camera so they feel like you're talking right to them." On stalkers: "That's the dark side of TV news but it's worth it."

K: Some people want to discredit women's succcess in TV news "by saying you slept your way to the top. They either say you're an idiot or you slept to you top. ... Some people said I slept my way to the top." [Kelly categorically rejected that..."on a stack of Bibles."]

K: Bill "Hammer's a good looking guy."

Howard also played a game with Kelly called "F**k, Marry and Kill," in which Kelly was asked who she would sleep with, whom she would marry, and whom she would kill amongst these three Fox talents: Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. The results? She'd marry Hannity, sleep with O'Reilly and kill Glenn Beck. Why marry Hannity? "He probably has the most dough and he's the youngest." Why sleep with O'Reilly? "Because he wrote a book that had some saucy sex scenes in there." Why kill Beck? "Because I know Glenn the least."

Who else is hot at Fox, asked Stern. Julie Banderas, responded Kelly, calling Banderas a "hot mama." "She's a beautiful woman. She's got the Latina thing going on, the saucy vixen."

K: "I'm conservative on some things and I'm not on others. ... I'm not going to say how I vote. ... I love that people make these assumptions about you because you work at Fox. ... That's my job, to be contrarian, to push people."

K: "You don't get on air at Fox unless Roger [Ailes] interviews you personally. ... I think he's looking for people who are interesting, who are smart, who'll be good on television."

K: "Who knew that one eyebrow was freakishly higher than the other? ... Why is that? That's all I can look at when I look at myself on TV. ... You want to know what I love most about myself? I'll tell you the truth: My clavicle.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0410/Megyn_Kelly_does_The_Stern_Show.html#top
Report Abuse
  • Megyn did Stern's show for the public interest, not because her ratings are low - you Fox News bashers are so illiterate, so transparent - grow up.

  • Posted By: frank | April 20, 2010 at 04:05 PM
    Report Abuse
  • I'm sorry M.Kelly had to lower herself to interview with Stern. Have always admired Megyn, but never Stern - he us a low life.

  • Posted By: Boggs | April 21, 2010 at 12:04 AM
    Report Abuse
  • You fixed news defenders are so boring and predictable. If a liberal went on stern and said what kelly said you'd be disgusted. Thats why I'm not a right winger anymore. The rights motto is if I agree with you politically you can get away with murder. Fox news is a network of hacks and money hungry hores. Meghan Kelly should be embarrased by what she said but thats another rule working at fox, have no shame, never apologize and show no remorse.

  • Posted By: killa | April 21, 2010 at 03:57 AM
    Report Abuse
  • Kelly has completely lost my respect for doing this interview.Who really cares what Howard Stern thinks about anything.No serious political journalist should lower themselves to that level.Won't be watching her again!

  • Posted By: nancye | April 21, 2010 at 07:42 AM
    Report Abuse
  • I used to think she was classy, but she has shown she would sell her soul for a buck...
  • ___________________________________________
  • The transcript speaks for itself. Meghan Kelly is not what she presented herself to be during that debate. She owes Donald Trump a huge apology and Fox News needs to let her go.
 
Last edited:
Jeremiah we're still waiting for that QUOTE of the supposed "lies and false allegations" you speak of...



"lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate. "


impatient1.gif
 
Kelly is a slut and a communist. And you know what? She probably WAS on her period! Women really shouldn't be allowed to be involved in this kind of thing. They really don't have the critical thinking skills to involve themselves in politics.
Republicans sure know how to win the women's vote.

This is going to be easy for hillary.
 
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

She didn't tell the truth about him and you didn't tell the truth about what she said during that interview. I posted the transcript from that interview - from 2010 - they either edited the interview or you are living in denial and didn't want to admit her discussion with Stern was inappropriate.
 
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

You were not honest about what Meghan Kelly said in that interview with Howard Stern. One of two things happened Either the video was edited or you heard the following which I am posting here from a 2010 transcript of the interview. Now I posted the video and I did click it to see that the video was working but I am not listening to Howard Stern so I didn't listen to the interview - I can see clearly that you left out the truth about what she said - you'll just have to admit that Kelly had no room to talk about Trump after talking like this on Howard Stern's Radio Show:

Megyn Kelly talks dirty - On Media - POLITICO.com

April 20, 2010
Categories:

Megyn Kelly talks dirty
Fox News' Megyn Kelly holds a special place in the hearts of Washingtonians. She cut her chops here, working at WJLA and Fox News. She loves Bill Sammon (and John Mayer loves her). She likes food. She's taken on Britney. She can yell. And she's a Taylor Hicks fan.

She's also willing to talk to Howard Stern, which she did today. And, as might be expected, the talk got dirty.

Topics followed expected lines when dealing with Stern: her legs, pre-marital sex, when she lost her virginity, her sex life with her husband, sex in the TV news business, and, of course, porn.

The show summary after the jump...

>UPDATE: Kelly addressed feedback to her Stern appearance at the end of her afternoon show Tuesday and read some viewer emails. "Megyn, I thought you had more integrity and class." "I heard your interview on Howard Stern. Your cred went way up with me. You get him and you're comfortable with yourself to talk about your life without being inappropriate."

Before Kelly walks in:

Howard: "The reason she's here is because she's the hottest TV person I've seen in a long time."

Robin Quivers: "And she's promoting that!"

Howard: "I just want to see a hot chick." Adding: "She is the hottest newscaster. ... I feel a little nervous Robin."

Kelly walks in:

"Baby, look at you..."

Highlights:

H: "Are you attracted to my wife at all? ... Have you been with another woman?"

M: "I can honestly say I haven't. ... Maybe [Howard's wife] will be the first. ... I'm into guys."

M: "I'm not into porn."

H: Have you always had a boyfriend?

K: "Pretty much. ... Maybe it's an insecurity thing. ... I do need a little attention. I like to be adored."

K: "They Fox-ify you over at Fox News. ... Fox is full of beauties. ... They're all beautiful, honestly."

H: What happens to you at Fox News when a woman gets ugly?

K: "They take you down to the basement, beat you and kick you out the door. ... No! ... I mean, honestly, it's TV. It's a fickle business. ... I do feel pressure to look my best."

K: "I believe what Kevin Bacon said: Keep the fights clean and the sex dirty and you have happy marriage."

K: "They say that newscasters often get stalked more than celebrities because you're looking right in the camera so they feel like you're talking right to them." On stalkers: "That's the dark side of TV news but it's worth it."

K: Some people want to discredit women's succcess in TV news "by saying you slept your way to the top. They either say you're an idiot or you slept to you top. ... Some people said I slept my way to the top." [Kelly categorically rejected that..."on a stack of Bibles."]

K: Bill "Hammer's a good looking guy."

Howard also played a game with Kelly called "F**k, Marry and Kill," in which Kelly was asked who she would sleep with, whom she would marry, and whom she would kill amongst these three Fox talents: Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. The results? She'd marry Hannity, sleep with O'Reilly and kill Glenn Beck. Why marry Hannity? "He probably has the most dough and he's the youngest." Why sleep with O'Reilly? "Because he wrote a book that had some saucy sex scenes in there." Why kill Beck? "Because I know Glenn the least."

Who else is hot at Fox, asked Stern. Julie Banderas, responded Kelly, calling Banderas a "hot mama." "She's a beautiful woman. She's got the Latina thing going on, the saucy vixen."

K: "I'm conservative on some things and I'm not on others. ... I'm not going to say how I vote. ... I love that people make these assumptions about you because you work at Fox. ... That's my job, to be contrarian, to push people."

K: "You don't get on air at Fox unless Roger [Ailes] interviews you personally. ... I think he's looking for people who are interesting, who are smart, who'll be good on television."

K: "Who knew that one eyebrow was freakishly higher than the other? ... Why is that? That's all I can look at when I look at myself on TV. ... You want to know what I love most about myself? I'll tell you the truth: My clavicle.

Report Abuse
  • Megyn did Stern's show for the public interest, not because her ratings are low - you Fox News bashers are so illiterate, so transparent - grow up.

  • Posted By: frank | April 20, 2010 at 04:05 PM
    Report Abuse
  • I'm sorry M.Kelly had to lower herself to interview with Stern. Have always admired Megyn, but never Stern - he us a low life.

  • Posted By: Boggs | April 21, 2010 at 12:04 AM
    Report Abuse
  • You fixed news defenders are so boring and predictable. If a liberal went on stern and said what kelly said you'd be disgusted. Thats why I'm not a right winger anymore. The rights motto is if I agree with you politically you can get away with murder. Fox news is a network of hacks and money hungry hores. Meghan Kelly should be embarrased by what she said but thats another rule working at fox, have no shame, never apologize and show no remorse.

  • Posted By: killa | April 21, 2010 at 03:57 AM
    Report Abuse
  • Kelly has completely lost my respect for doing this interview.Who really cares what Howard Stern thinks about anything.No serious political journalist should lower themselves to that level.Won't be watching her again!

  • Posted By: nancye | April 21, 2010 at 07:42 AM
    Report Abuse
  • I used to think she was classy, but she has shown she would sell her soul for a buck...
  • ___________________________________________
  • The transcript speaks for itself. Meghan Kelly is not what she presented herself to be during that debate. She owes Donald Trump a huge apology and Fox News needs to let her go.
That's even milder than I expected.
 
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

She didn't tell the truth about him and you didn't tell the truth about what she said during that interview. I posted the transcript from that interview - from 2010 - they either edited the interview or you are living in denial and didn't want to admit her discussion with Stern was inappropriate.
So now you are the moral arbiter ? Judge not least you be judged

Kelly was speaking of herself not attacking anyone, stiff necked blue noses religious always judge people who don't believe like them
 
Last edited:
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

She didn't tell the truth about him and you didn't tell the truth about what she said during that interview. I posted the transcript from that interview - from 2010 - they either edited the interview or you are living in denial and didn't want to admit her discussion with Stern was inappropriate.
Lying is a sin, holier than thou asshole. What fact in her question was not true? Did he not call Rosie O'Donell a "fat pig"; did he not refer to another woman as a "dog"; did he not tell an apprentice contestant that he bets she looked good on her knees; did he not tell a woman who asked for a break in a deposition so she could pump breast milk for her child "disgusting." All of those are things he said; things he has not denied saying. So either tell, specifically, what "lie" she told or shut the fuck up.
 
Kelly is a slut and a communist. And you know what? She probably WAS on her period! Women really shouldn't be allowed to be involved in this kind of thing. They really don't have the critical thinking skills to involve themselves in politics.
Republicans sure know how to win the women's vote.

This is going to be easy for hillary.

Sarcasm alert.
 
Jeremiah we're still waiting for that QUOTE of the supposed "lies and false allegations" you speak of...



"lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate. "


impatient1.gif

Where to begin?

Let's start here:

The Disgusting Big Lie About Donald Trump The American Spectator

ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE

THE DISGUSTING BIG LIE ABOUT DONALD TRUMP
By Jeffrey Lord – 8.10.15

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” — Joseph Goebbels

Disgusting. And desperate. The headline on the front page of the print version of New York Times shrieked:

A Word Too Far? ‘Blood’ Remark Tests the GOP: Trump Provokes Again

Fallout From Suggestion That Moderator Was Menstruating

And the “proof” of this disgusting headline? These words from Donald Trump to CNN’s Don Lemon: “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”

Having listened to Trump say these words in real time, I thought nothing of it. In fact, I myself had noticed Kelly’s fierce glare across the stage at Trump and thought it an apt description. The next day I awaken to the news that Trump had been disinvited from a Red State appearance by Erick Erickson because, said Erickson, “I think there is no way to otherwise interpret Mr. Trump’s comment.”

Read More
_________________
On Meghan Kelly's accusations against Trump - she said as if it were fact - “you’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals.” Donald Trump corrected her and told her he had called Rosie O'Donnell certain words from a dispute they had - years ago. Let's face it, Valerie. Meghan Kelly made a statement - a false accusation against him that she should not have made - and it has backfired on her. Now clearly Donald Trump should not have said that about Rosie O'Donnell - but did he say that about women in general? No. Meghan Kelly lied about what he had said - she did not give an accurate depiction of what he had said because she wanted to portray him as someone who exploited women. Meanwhile? There is the matter of that trashy interview with Howard Stern...............
 
Last edited:
Thank you for admitting that Meghan Kelly is not there to speak truth nor report accurately. She's there to "move people" or more honestly to... stir them up with lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate.

I was wondering why so many liberals were defending her today!

Excuse me, but it is clear these lack of morals she displays have greatly increased her popularity with some of you!

So in your eyes, she should be defended because she is a liar and you can count on her not to report accurately?

That is quite a different way of approving people, Lonelaugher. I'm appalled.


can you quote the LIE you are claiming that she made, or are YOU the liar here? :eusa_whistle:
What pisses off the Trump supporters is she told the truth about him. He really did say those things. Since they cannot claim he didn't, the attack the person who asked him about his words. Remarkable.

She didn't tell the truth about him and you didn't tell the truth about what she said during that interview. I posted the transcript from that interview - from 2010 - they either edited the interview or you are living in denial and didn't want to admit her discussion with Stern was inappropriate.
Who did she insult?

And she's not running for president, trump is.

Anyways, I'm going to stop worrying about trump cause he's done.

Did you see Cruz is number 2 now and Ben carson is 3? What happened to Walker kasich and jeb? Lol
 
Jeremiah we're still waiting for that QUOTE of the supposed "lies and false allegations" you speak of...



"lies and false allegations against a presidential candidate. "


impatient1.gif

Where to begin?

Let's start here:

The Disgusting Big Lie About Donald Trump The American Spectator
Are you really that stupid? Your article is about what Trump said about bleeding after the debate. You claim that Kelly lied about Trump at the debate. You have not offered a single example of anything she said that was false and now offer up this silly claim that he was not referring to her period with his bleeding comment. What Did KELLY say about trump that was false? Simple question. ANSWER IT.
 
The news report I heard this morning was that the original interview with Stern was so filthy they had to ban it on family websites and it is quite possible the version we have now was heavily edited, Paddy. The original report on the story was the language was perverse and disgraceful. She was the wrong person to question Trump. She is guilty of far worse behavior on Howard Stern than anything Trump was accused of concerning Rosie O'Donell.
So, you are discussing something you have never heard or seen? You think she is guilty of far worse, but you have no idea what she did to be guilty of that? Do you write reviews on Yelp for restaurants you never ate at? Movie reviews without actually seeing the movie?

I do not watch Howard Stern nor do I listen to him by radio. That is not my company and I would not tune into to Howard Stern much less appear as a guest on his show! The fact that Meghan Kelly would and did, is quite telling.

The story is out but as the news report this morning on Insight mentioned - they are trying to bury it. Why? Because it doesn't look good for Meghan Kelly. That is why.
Minor point, but her name is Megyn Kellly. You are too fucking stupid to bother spelling her name right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top