Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. From YOUR LINK:
"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police (Sund) says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress."
Who were the "security officials from the House and Senate" who denied Sund's request for the National Guard?
Was Nancy Pelosi one of them? Was it just Irving & Stenger? Stenger said he wanted them. Was the "architect" the swing vote? Hang his ass if he was.
2. I never said Nancy Pelosi wasn't involved, that's a lie. I said we don't know who "officially" denied the requests.
3. Resigning doesn't prove that they made the call not to activate the National Guard. It just proved they suck at their job.
4. The Capitol Police Board lied when they said no one requested the National Guard. Sund already testified that he requested the Guard, as well as President Trump.
5. When Republicans win the House back in November, you can bet that in 2023 there will be subpoenas to Sund, Irving, Pelosi and Stenger to get to the bottom of who made the horrible decision NOT to activate the National Guard for J6.
Who is watching the January 6th hearings?
View attachment 655856
Kaz was to big of coward to watch the hearing. Trump minions called it Democrats trying to smear Trump.LOL, "facts," LOL. That's hilarious, TDS boy
Zzz. There has been zero “damaging testimony” so far.Kaz was to big of coward to watch the hearing. Trump minions called it Democrats trying to smear Trump.
The damaging testimony did not come from any Democrats. It came from Trump's cabinet, Trump's family, law enforcement and the military.
There is more to come but you do not have the back bone to watch because your cult leader has told you not to. Pathetic.
We've seen all the evidence. None of it is credible.If they show credible evidence of their findings is that just confirmation bias, or proof?
I agree that the Board had 3 members, the two Sgts at Arms (Irving & Stenger) and the Architect. The Capitol Police Chief (Sund) is a non-voting member.Holy shit.
Again... the article says who...
Paul Irving and Michael Stenger. They were the security officials for the House and Senate, not Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi is the Speaker of the House, not a security official. The House Sergeant of Arms doesn't even report to the House Speaker; they report to the Committee on House Administration...
I agree that the Board had 3 members, the two Sgts at Arms (Irving & Stenger) and the Architect. The Capitol Police Chief (Sund) is a non-voting member.
The part that doesn't make sense is that Stenger said he wanted the NG for J6.
Sund said he wanted the NG for J6. That's half the board. No clue how the architect voted, or if he voted.
Irving worked under Nancy Pelosi, but he won't say if he decided not to bring in the NG, or if he was directed not to bring them in because of "optics".
We disagree that the control Board is "independent" of congressional supervision. There is congressional "oversight", but no one says exactly how that happens. Both Lindsay Graham and Jim Jordan believe that Nancy Pelosi may have made the "No Guard" call.
I'm happy to wait until 2023 when the GOP takes back congress and can issue subpoenas to:
Stenger
Irving
Pelosi
the architect
Bowser
Sund
To see how the bad decision NOT to bring the Guard in on J6 was made.
Until then I'll defer to your opinion that "the Board" made the independent bad call. <poof>
I am.Who is watching the January 6th hearings?
View attachment 655856
thehill.com
How do you know?Not I, it would be a BIG waste of time. Just ANOTHER "nothingburger", so to speak.
No, not watching a lib carnival.
You only saw a tiny part of the evidence, and it was doccumented quite well. Of course, it's well known that you and reality aren't on good terms, so what you think doesn't surprise anybody.We've seen all the evidence. None of it is credible.
Apparently Trump thought so! The lunatic in chief apparently went berserk when Barr said that his claims on voter fraud were bullshit. Ivanka piled on when she said she believed Barr. Put a fork in the orange fat man.Zzz. There has been zero “damaging testimony” so far.
well i’m eagerly waiting for the rest of the evidence and that smoking gun linking all Shifty’s parody togetherYou only saw a tiny part of the evidence, and it was doccumented quite well. Of course, it's well known that you and reality aren't on good terms, so what you think doesn't surprise anybody.
Nineteen million last night!Who is watching the January 6th hearings?
View attachment 655856
I never said that. My links show Lindsay Graham and Jim Jordan both said Nancy Pelosi had oversight of the Board.It wasn't just me saying the Capitol Police Board made that call. YOU said it too. YOU said...
"Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard."
Don't YOU believe what YOU post??
www.bizpacreview.com
Coward!No, not watching a lib carnival.
I've seen thousands of pages of it. None of it proves an insurrection, douchebag.You only saw a tiny part of the evidence, and it was doccumented quite well. Of course, it's well known that you and reality aren't on good terms, so what you think doesn't surprise anybody.
