HaShev
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,604
- 6,987
- 335
Ok well here's the obvious comparison you are conveniently ignoring that i pointed out in my thread. The democrat majority in Obama's first two years passed multiple pieces of major legislation. Some of them occurred in the first 6 months of Obama's presidency.So tell me, you can all decide on one restaurant during a gathering of groups of your family members let alone try to do it with aprox 52 people? Didn't think so.Well that's just stupid. Obviously democrats wouldn't vote for that atrocious bill. The point is republicans have a majority and are more than legally capable of passing their own agenda....can voters stop being morons and voting for republicans? They can't even pass major legislation while being in control of congress and the White House. They are useless sacks of garbage.
It bewilders me that ANYONE would think they ever gave a shit about the poor and middle class. How many legislative examples do people need? It's funny to me when republican voters say "the poor shouldn't get handouts!" yet they vote for corrupt assholes who give plenty of handouts to corporations and top 1% earners. God you people are stupid.
Sure democrats prior to 2010 could have been a lot more effective, but at least they still passed major healthcare and financial reform regardless of what one thought of those policies.
You do realize the Gov't has 2 major parties not one, and since 48 dems could not pass the bill you are saying Dems are over 10x more incompetent.
![]()
IF ONE GROUP COMPROMISES and you adjust to fulfill the spoiled part of your group's demand then there will be new issues with another group that did not exist till you changed to accomadate. I dare you to pick a restaurant with some that require vegan while others refuse fish or Thai, then accomadate gluten free with keeping religious food laws...* good luck*
All while having Schumer kicking and screaming and crying that he hates sushi and it will kill him if he eats a blow fish, then Schumer makes his side of the family all denounce any
restaurant you choose no matter what it is, because he'd rather be home eating hamburgers off the floor with
David Hasselhoff in his Bay Watch uniform.
![]()
Are you catching on yet?
Yes they did and we see how well that worked out when people voted affiliation and not what the people wanted.
They accomadated their president even when they knew he was wrong, they did the same for Bill Clinton even when they didn't want to and his budget caused all kinds of problems.
I see so many Dem Senators revealing they have no clue whatcs in the bill they voted down, because one said it would be good for provisions to make sure people don't just jump in and out upon needs and that is already in the bill.
Why One party or the other can't share
ideas is due to affiliations, whereby they don't want to help the other, & or risk the other takes credit by stealing those ideas, therefore our best interest is sacrificed by this insane 2 party system where everyone worrys about party over country.
I blame Dems more for this problem, because they control the MSM bias and prevent
third and more parties equal rights.
Now back to recent news:
why can Pakistan just now rid corrupt
politicians, but we let them run for
president and payoff corrupt Pakistanis to keep quiet?