Screaming Eagle
Active Member
- Oct 8, 2009
- 562
- 66
- 28
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many ways can one say, 'told you so?'
Tea partiers turn on GOP leadership - Yahoo! News
Tea partiers turn on GOP leadership
Alex Isenstadt
Sun Oct 11, 8:00 am ET
While the energy of the anti-tax and anti-Big Government tea party movement may yet haunt Democrats in 2010, the first order of business appears to be remaking the Republican Party.
Whether its the loose confederation of Washington-oriented groups that have played an organizational role or the state-level activists who are channeling grass-roots anger into action back home, tea party forces are confronting the Republican establishment by backing insurgent conservatives and generating their own candidates even if it means taking on GOP incumbents.
We will be a headache for anyone who believes the Constitution of the United States isnt to be protected, said Dick Armey, chairman of the anti-tax and limited government advocacy group FreedomWorks, which helped plan and promote the tea parties, town hall protests and the September Taxpayer March in Washington. If you cant take it seriously, we will look for places of other employment for you.
Were not a partisan organization, and I think many Republicans are disappointed we are not, added Armey, a former GOP congressman...
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
By serious people you mean liberals right? I can't seem to wrap my head around the idea that a Republican backed, Republican sponsored group would go around attacking Republicans.
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
By serious people you mean liberals right? I can't seem to wrap my head around the idea that a Republican backed, Republican sponsored group would go around attacking Republicans.
why not... it is just an effort on the part of the republican base to purge its ranks of those who are not pure ande totally committed to the cause.
By serious people you mean liberals right? I can't seem to wrap my head around the idea that a Republican backed, Republican sponsored group would go around attacking Republicans.
why not... it is just an effort on the part of the republican base to purge its ranks of those who are not pure ande totally committed to the cause.
I think it's mostly a matter of how you put it. The tea party people probably almost all voted for McCain or a 3rd party conservative in the last election. But, they are fed up with not being represented. McCain is a damned moderate, probably slightly left of center, and Bush wasn't much further to the right than McCain. The entire Republican party hasn't actually done what their platform calls for in a long time, they've been halfway to the Democrats, really both parties have moved left quite a bit. This is a grassroots effort to protest issues. It has been about issues, not parties. Recently, they have gotten involved to some degree in party politics with the idea of nominating people to run against Republicans in the primaries which is certainly a push to move the Republican Party back to the right and towards the parties own platform.
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
Exactly, and that's exactly the reason McCain lost, he did not inspire the fiscal conservatives in this country, I voted for Sarah, not McCain. Keep in mind that only 53% of Americans voted for Obama, that's hardly a landslide. Had there been a fiscally conservative candidate in there from the get go, they could have possibly won the Presidency. Why the GOP ever got behind McCain still baffles me, it was a very stupid mistake, especially considering that the GOP lost the house and the senate because they strayed from their fiscally conservative values. You would have thought that they learned something from that experience, but they didn't.![]()
I saw two tea party folks interviewed today. One of them said Palin would be a great president, and mentioned DeMint. I do hope the tea baggers take over the GOP.
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
By serious people you mean liberals right? I can't seem to wrap my head around the idea that a Republican backed, Republican sponsored group would go around attacking Republicans.
Did anyone seriously ever think that the Tea Party people backed the Republicans?
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
Exactly, and that's exactly the reason McCain lost, he did not inspire the fiscal conservatives in this country, I voted for Sarah, not McCain. Keep in mind that only 53% of Americans voted for Obama, that's hardly a landslide. Had there been a fiscally conservative candidate in there from the get go, they could have possibly won the Presidency. Why the GOP ever got behind McCain still baffles me, it was a very stupid mistake, especially considering that the GOP lost the house and the senate because they strayed from their fiscally conservative values. You would have thought that they learned something from that experience, but they didn't.![]()
All serious people did and still do. Notice at all the these "attacks on Republicans" being made by the teabaggers are because they're "not conservative enough". That's the same line of criticism the GOP used on McCain.
Exactly, and that's exactly the reason McCain lost, he did not inspire the fiscal conservatives in this country, I voted for Sarah, not McCain. Keep in mind that only 53% of Americans voted for Obama, that's hardly a landslide. Had there been a fiscally conservative candidate in there from the get go, they could have possibly won the Presidency. Why the GOP ever got behind McCain still baffles me, it was a very stupid mistake, especially considering that the GOP lost the house and the senate because they strayed from their fiscally conservative values. You would have thought that they learned something from that experience, but they didn't.![]()
I don't think the GOP ever got behind McCain, he shot himself in the foot every time he opened his mouth. That he has always done well. The combined Media Efforts aligned with infiltrators got him the nomination. Did he carry a single state that got him nominated in the general Election?
Exactly, and that's exactly the reason McCain lost, he did not inspire the fiscal conservatives in this country, I voted for Sarah, not McCain. Keep in mind that only 53% of Americans voted for Obama, that's hardly a landslide. Had there been a fiscally conservative candidate in there from the get go, they could have possibly won the Presidency. Why the GOP ever got behind McCain still baffles me, it was a very stupid mistake, especially considering that the GOP lost the house and the senate because they strayed from their fiscally conservative values. You would have thought that they learned something from that experience, but they didn't.![]()
I don't think the GOP ever got behind McCain, he shot himself in the foot every time he opened his mouth. That he has always done well. The combined Media Efforts aligned with infiltrators got him the nomination. Did he carry a single state that got him nominated in the general Election?
South Carolina, Missouri, Oklahoma, Arizona, Texas, Mississippi, Nebraska, Kentucky, Idaho, and South Dakota
I don't think the GOP ever got behind McCain, he shot himself in the foot every time he opened his mouth. That he has always done well. The combined Media Efforts aligned with infiltrators got him the nomination. Did he carry a single state that got him nominated in the general Election?
South Carolina, Missouri, Oklahoma, Arizona, Texas, Mississippi, Nebraska, Kentucky, Idaho, and South Dakota
Well, at least He won His Home State. Only a real ass hole would lose that! LOL... Al Gore. LOL.
Those states are really rolling in Electoral Votes.... huh. Out side of Texas. Just proves the point, He should not have been the nominee in the first place. The corruption in the Primary system allowed it.
Some of us knew this all along. But since they are anti-Obama the libtard minions of the DNC lumped them all into their nice little cubby hole....racist Republicans...which as it turns out....is ANOTHER LIBERAL LIE PERPETRATED BY THE MSM AND THE DNC.
Indeed. They wouldn't believe that it was conservatives, libertarians, and independent voters. Well guess what, that's what it was and will be in the future. Get ready, a third party is a possibility if the two mainstays don't start representing.
actually, thats changingNot really. Dive Con and I were discussing which party is more heavily represented among tea partiers. Intense quoted the discussion and replied with one word: "Independents." I was asking her to explain how that one word response applied.
I understand that Democrats, on the whole, are not as sympathetic to the Tea Party cause and that a new party comprised of Tea Partiers would more likely draw a lot more heavily from the GOP than from the Democratic Party. So agreeing with my observation doesn't really answer my question to Intense.
If you look at the break down of political affiliation of late, it's about 35% Dem, 35% Repub and about 30% "Independent" whatever that means.
So, I think Intense is partially correct and partially incorrect. There are some self-described independents who are no more independent than Nancy Pelosi. They just like the patina of "Independence" but when it really comes down to it, they would never vote for "the other party" unless some strained hypothetical were to occur (they will be happy to tell you about this hypothetical that maintains this patina of Independence too). There are other parts that are whack jobs to the left and right (Nazis, Communists, socialist workers party, etc.) they are permanently marginalized and unlikely to compromise. The remain bulk of independents are largely made up of people who like Ron Paul, Ross Perot etc. Largely disaffected conservatives/libertarians of one sort or another. I would attribute perhaps 20% of the 30% of independents to this (maybe a little less). In any case, it's a large chunk. Is it larger than conservative Republicans supporting the tea parties? I wouldn't think so. But, at this point, it might be as large.
I mentioned them in my first reply (non-affiliated) I think I said. But there's the detail.
last i saw it was about 38% dem 27% gop and 35% "other*"
*Libertarian, Green, Constitutional, etc