Why anti gun people are so angry.....

sure , they are not defenseless but most male criminals are stronger than females , weak people , disabled people and the elderly Brian . He11 , fienstein carries or used to carry a gun , mrobama and family always have a bevy of armed bodyguards !!

When a man who is twice your size and strength is intent upon raping you, there is nothing you can do to stop him, short of mortally injuring him with a firearm.

You can consider yourself defenseless all you want. You don't speak for all women however. My wife for instance is far from defenseless. Haha

What is this? Some kind of a joke to you? I suppose ALL of those women who have been raped just allowed it to happen then, huh brainless.

No a lot of them were drugged or drunk. Many are not yet adults. Many are taken advantage of by someone they know. But no all women are not defenseless.


Well..since most states require you to be 21 to own and carry a gun....they would all be adults.....and at 17, they can carry a rifle and pistol in a combat zone for their country...but they can't carry a gun to stop a rape......really?
 
Well, I just hope all of the intelligent people here can see Brainless dishonesty in action. THAT is why I hate him. He wants women to be defenseless against the men who would prey upon them.

If women were NOT defenseless, as he claims, then there would be very FEW rapes. He is a lying sack of crap. That is all.
 
sure , they are not defenseless but most male criminals are stronger than females , weak people , disabled people and the elderly Brian . He11 , fienstein carries or used to carry a gun , mrobama and family always have a bevy of armed bodyguards !!

When a man who is twice your size and strength is intent upon raping you, there is nothing you can do to stop him, short of mortally injuring him with a firearm.

You can consider yourself defenseless all you want. You don't speak for all women however. My wife for instance is far from defenseless. Haha

What is this? Some kind of a joke to you? I suppose ALL of those women who have been raped just allowed it to happen then, huh brainless.

No a lot of them were drugged or drunk. Many are not yet adults. Many are taken advantage of by someone they know. But no all women are not defenseless.


Well..since most states require you to be 21 to own and carry a gun....they would all be adults.....and at 17, they can carry a rifle and pistol in a combat zone for their country...but they can't carry a gun to stop a rape......really?

No they can carry a gun if they choose obviously. But very few rapes are defendable with a gun.
 
Tell these women they are defenseless.
Successful self-defense by women


So...some manage it many, many others do not.....I will side with giving them the option.....you guys want them to use the least effective method to save their lives...having trained in the arts my whole life and taught them....guns are simply the most effective way to defend yourself....
 
Well, I just hope all of the intelligent people here can see Brainless dishonesty in action. THAT is why I hate him. He wants women to be defenseless against the men who would prey upon them.

If women were NOT defenseless, as he claims, then there would be very FEW rapes. He is a lying sack of crap. That is all.

My link proved women are not defenseless. Stop insulting women.
 
didn't look at the link Brian but I Guess that its a link to classes or ways that a woman can fight an attacker with out a gun . Finally looked and YEAH , its a silly link Brian , it tells success stories of women getting their hands dirty and physically fighting an attacker . Best to be aware and properly armed and there will be no wrestling an attacker on the ground !! PS , your arguments sound like the arguments of a English subject Brian !!
 
Why are anti gun folks angry? Pro gun idiots want it all! No back ground checks, no MANDATORY safety courses, no liability laws against those morons who have unsecured guns around children, no waiting period to buy even MORE guns.

And a warped rationalization that dead kids are gonna happen, so why not get some more guns.

School yards, restaurants, churches, college campuses, offices and theaters are shot up by gun nuts and then those gun nuts claim it's their 'right' to put MORE guns on the streets.

That 2nd amendment has a phrase the gun nuts NEVER quote. "A well regulated militia..." . There are guns folks have had and should have. Hunting and target rifles, shot guns. But a weapon designed for war, a weapon that has a semi-automatic or fully automatic firing system, has a magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds. Such weapons are designed for the battle field, not the hunting grounds and certainly not on the streets.

But gun nuts throw shallow logic at the situation and continue to try to hide behind the second phase of the 2nd amendment.

You'll have to take that up with the Supreme Court. They ruled on whose interpretation was correct not to long ago. Spoiler alert...your side lost.

You want to get in on this one...the last challengee abandoned the field of battle.

I'll challenge you. Show me a reasonable proposed gun law that would have averted Newtown that is not an outright ban.
 
When a man who is twice your size and strength is intent upon raping you, there is nothing you can do to stop him, short of mortally injuring him with a firearm.

You can consider yourself defenseless all you want. You don't speak for all women however. My wife for instance is far from defenseless. Haha

What is this? Some kind of a joke to you? I suppose ALL of those women who have been raped just allowed it to happen then, huh brainless.

No a lot of them were drugged or drunk. Many are not yet adults. Many are taken advantage of by someone they know. But no all women are not defenseless.


Well..since most states require you to be 21 to own and carry a gun....they would all be adults.....and at 17, they can carry a rifle and pistol in a combat zone for their country...but they can't carry a gun to stop a rape......really?

No they can carry a gun if they choose obviously. But very few rapes are defendable with a gun.

That is not true. According to statistics, 200,000 women have used guns to defend themselves from rape, and some didn't even have to fire a shot, just brandishing the weapon was enough to scare off the perpetrator. More dishonesty from the brainless.
 
didn't look at the link Brian but I Guess that its a link to classes or ways that a woman can fight an attacker with out a gun . Finally looked and YEAH , its a silly link Brian , it tells success stories of women getting their hands dirty and physically fighting an attacker . Best to be aware and properly armed and there will be no wrestling an attacker on the ground !! PS , your arguments sound like the arguments of a English subject Brian !!

It was to show women are not defenseless. I think it shows that quite clearly.
 
Well, I just hope all of the intelligent people here can see Brainless dishonesty in action. THAT is why I hate him. He wants women to be defenseless against the men who would prey upon them.

If women were NOT defenseless, as he claims, then there would be very FEW rapes. He is a lying sack of crap. That is all.

My link proved women are not defenseless. Stop insulting women.

You link proves nothing except that some women got lucky.
 
didn't look at the link Brian but I Guess that its a link to classes or ways that a woman can fight an attacker with out a gun . Finally looked and YEAH , its a silly link Brian , it tells success stories of women getting their hands dirty and physically fighting an attacker . Best to be aware and properly armed and there will be no wrestling an attacker on the ground !! PS , your arguments sound like the arguments of a English subject Brian !!

It was to show women are not defenseless. I think it shows that quite clearly.

No, most women would not be able to physically overpower a male. THAT is a fact. Especially if they are petite women like myself.
 
You can consider yourself defenseless all you want. You don't speak for all women however. My wife for instance is far from defenseless. Haha

What is this? Some kind of a joke to you? I suppose ALL of those women who have been raped just allowed it to happen then, huh brainless.

No a lot of them were drugged or drunk. Many are not yet adults. Many are taken advantage of by someone they know. But no all women are not defenseless.


Well..since most states require you to be 21 to own and carry a gun....they would all be adults.....and at 17, they can carry a rifle and pistol in a combat zone for their country...but they can't carry a gun to stop a rape......really?

No they can carry a gun if they choose obviously. But very few rapes are defendable with a gun.

That is not true. According to statistics, 200,000 women have used guns to defend themselves from rape, and some didn't even have to fire a shot, just brandishing the weapon was enough to scare off the perpetrator. More dishonesty from the brainless.

Not statistics, a bad survey. Statics show there are about 80,000 rapes a year. Most of which aren't defendable with a gun.
 
didn't look at the link Brian but I Guess that its a link to classes or ways that a woman can fight an attacker with out a gun . Finally looked and YEAH , its a silly link Brian , it tells success stories of women getting their hands dirty and physically fighting an attacker . Best to be aware and properly armed and there will be no wrestling an attacker on the ground !! PS , your arguments sound like the arguments of a English subject Brian !!

It was to show women are not defenseless. I think it shows that quite clearly.

No, most women would not be able to physically overpower a male. THAT is a fact. Especially if they are petite women like myself.

Many have the ability to get away from a rape. And it is a fact women are not defenseless without a gun.
 
What is this? Some kind of a joke to you? I suppose ALL of those women who have been raped just allowed it to happen then, huh brainless.

No a lot of them were drugged or drunk. Many are not yet adults. Many are taken advantage of by someone they know. But no all women are not defenseless.


Well..since most states require you to be 21 to own and carry a gun....they would all be adults.....and at 17, they can carry a rifle and pistol in a combat zone for their country...but they can't carry a gun to stop a rape......really?

No they can carry a gun if they choose obviously. But very few rapes are defendable with a gun.

That is not true. According to statistics, 200,000 women have used guns to defend themselves from rape, and some didn't even have to fire a shot, just brandishing the weapon was enough to scare off the perpetrator. More dishonesty from the brainless.

Not statistics, a bad survey. Statics show there are about 80,000 rapes a year. Most of which aren't defendable with a gun.

80,000 rapes per year. Those 200,000 women would not be included in those stats because they were NOT raped. More lies from you. Thank you for proving to everyone what a lying sack of shit you are.
 
didn't look at the link Brian but I Guess that its a link to classes or ways that a woman can fight an attacker with out a gun . Finally looked and YEAH , its a silly link Brian , it tells success stories of women getting their hands dirty and physically fighting an attacker . Best to be aware and properly armed and there will be no wrestling an attacker on the ground !! PS , your arguments sound like the arguments of a English subject Brian !!

It was to show women are not defenseless. I think it shows that quite clearly.

No, most women would not be able to physically overpower a male. THAT is a fact. Especially if they are petite women like myself.

Many have the ability to get away from a rape. And it is a fact women are not defenseless without a gun.

Liar.
 
In the "old days" there were rarely any duels over disagreements on political matters. Today there are damn few who discuss an issue without calling names or going ballistic.

Being a jerk is not a capital offense.


But should it be..............?

Fuck no it shouldn't be. Just because someone disagrees with you or is a jerk does not mean they should die.

Yeah...but what if they are a really big jerk?

Unless they are threatening you, nope. Sorry. No open season on jerks.


What about a limited season....like in the fall....?

I think spring would be a better choice. Unlike deer,Jerks become more active in the spring affording more chances of a trophy Jerk.
 
Why are anti gun folks angry? Pro gun idiots want it all! No back ground checks, no MANDATORY safety courses, no liability laws against those morons who have unsecured guns around children, no waiting period to buy even MORE guns.

And a warped rationalization that dead kids are gonna happen, so why not get some more guns.

School yards, restaurants, churches, college campuses, offices and theaters are shot up by gun nuts and then those gun nuts claim it's their 'right' to put MORE guns on the streets.

That 2nd amendment has a phrase the gun nuts NEVER quote. "A well regulated militia..." . There are guns folks have had and should have. Hunting and target rifles, shot guns. But a weapon designed for war, a weapon that has a semi-automatic or fully automatic firing system, has a magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds. Such weapons are designed for the battle field, not the hunting grounds and certainly not on the streets.

But gun nuts throw shallow logic at the situation and continue to try to hide behind the second phase of the 2nd amendment.


You do realize that fully automatic weapons are not generally available,or easy to acquire.....right?

You anti-gun nuts...do some research...it would make you less,afraid....


and 100 children is tragic...but there are over 320 million people in this country.....and more children die each year because of furniture than guns.....in pools than guns.......and yet those deaths aren't important to you....but that phobia...it grabs all of your attention.......and destroys your ability to think rationally...

and if the military has a rifle, then the people who pay for that rifle get to own one as well........we own the government...it doesn't own us....
 

Forum List

Back
Top