🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why are liberals so rude to the right?

Yeah. Limp-wristed flaming libs are always so vicious.

well at least you cleared that up. yea thought you were gay nothing wrong with that. You do know alot of lesbians they just want to be accepted. why do you gay guys want to be different? lesbians are cool gay guys should take a cue from "will and grace" just be cool......
 
Uncensored is completely a right wing statist progressive who wants to use state and federal government to force America to follow his views.

Force? Force what? Jake "you will follow the law" Starkey? Gimme a freaking break.

Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way? Uncensored, I believe, would employ others to employ violence to get his way the America should be in his mind. You really want to consider his character, TK: I can think of only two who are more deranged on the Board than he.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. Limp-wristed flaming libs are always so vicious.

well at least you cleared that up. yea thought you were gay nothing wrong with that. You do know alot of lesbians they just want to be accepted. why do you gay guys want to be different? lesbians are cool gay guys should take a cue from "will and grace" just be cool......

Here is a perfect example. We have a liberal making a light-hearted comment referring to his political persuasion with a common conservative pejorative and a conservative coming back with an attempted personal attack.

Does that mean conservatives are more rude? No... it just means that the one above is kind of a dick. I would also guess that all he knows about lesbians, he learned from porn... but I could be wrong.

People might claim that I am merely assuming their intentions and they would be right... but my post would be even more boring if I didn't.
 
Uncensored is completely a right wing statist progressive who wants to use state and federal government to force America to follow his views.

Force? Force what? Jake "you will follow the law" Starkey? Gimme a freaking break.

Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way?

So there's never a law you come across that you don't like? Is that it? I follow the law, laws that are rooted in precedent and are not repressive to those that they are intended to govern. I believe in justice, not heavy handed tactics.

But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy.
 
Force? Force what? Jake "you will follow the law" Starkey? Gimme a freaking break.

Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way?

So there's never a law you come across that you don't like? Is that it? I follow the law, laws that are rooted in precedent and are not repressive to those that they are intended to govern. I believe in justice, not heavy handed tactics.

But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy.

Non sequitur, TK, but that is what you do, when you don't have anything else.

Yes, the Rule of Law before the Rule of TemplarKormac, every time.
 
Force? Force what? Jake "you will follow the law" Starkey? Gimme a freaking break.

Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way?

So there's never a law you come across that you don't like? Is that it? I follow the law, laws that are rooted in precedent and are not repressive to those that they are intended to govern. I believe in justice, not heavy handed tactics.

But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy.

"But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy."

Democracy defines how we choose the people who make our laws, and on how they decide when there is sufficient agreement among them. Each law prescribes consequences for not being in compliance with it. Whether any particular person chooses the consequences over complying is their personal decision.
 
Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way?

So there's never a law you come across that you don't like? Is that it? I follow the law, laws that are rooted in precedent and are not repressive to those that they are intended to govern. I believe in justice, not heavy handed tactics.

But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy.

Non sequitur, TK, but that is what you do, when you don't have anything else.

Yes, the Rule of Law before the Rule of TemplarKormac, every time.

The Rule of Law is not absolute. Non sequitur? Or a well orchestrated dodge from you, Jake? Funny how you work. You think the law is supreme and absolute, it is far from such. If it were, we would be following laws that were passed by legislatures 175 years ago. All of them. No amendments, no Supreme Court rulings, nothing. Bare bones colonial laws.

Now, mister "I am the Law", show me your degree in Law. I am studying for mine, you are on the other hand, talking out of your backside. Don't make me laugh.
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.
 
Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way?

So there's never a law you come across that you don't like? Is that it? I follow the law, laws that are rooted in precedent and are not repressive to those that they are intended to govern. I believe in justice, not heavy handed tactics.

But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy.

"But the phrase "you will follow the law" sound more like despotism than democracy."

Democracy defines how we choose the people who make our laws, and on how they decide when there is sufficient agreement among them. Each law prescribes consequences for not being in compliance with it. Whether any particular person chooses the consequences over complying is their personal decision.

You're missing the point. The term "will" suggests that citizens follow the law regardless of it's standing in precedent, or its roots in justice. Tyranny follows those guidelines, monarchies follow these guidelines. We the people have the power to change, prescribe or petition amendments to the law, we even have the power to introduce law and vote on it. That is why states are able to pass their own laws so long as they don't conflict with the higher law. We normally refer to this as the "democratic" process.

Law will never be absolute. Law can become obsolete. Remember that.
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.

Define far left.
 
Uncensored is completely a right wing statist progressive who wants to use state and federal government to force America to follow his views.

Force? Force what? Jake "you will follow the law" Starkey? Gimme a freaking break.

Uncensored wishes to pervert the law, just as you wish to do so, TemplarKormac.

Why don't you two just follow the law, and where you don't like it, fight the right way? Uncensored, I believe, would employ others to employ violence to get his way the America should be in his mind. You really want to consider his character, TK: I can think of only two who are more deranged on the Board than he.

Insults are the arguments of foolish men. You're a classless individual, Jake. Insult? No. Fact? You bet your ass.
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.

Define far left.

You, Black_Label, rdean, poet, and Lakhota to name a few
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.

Define far left.

You, Black_Label, rdean, poet, and Lakhota to name a few

I am far left?

Please.....elaborate.
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.

Define far left.

The Liberal Brigade. Charge, WE NEED MORE GOV'T, MORE TAXES, MORE SOCIAL SPENDING, DIVERSITY, AND ETC.

They border on be Socialist/Communist in their Idiology. There will NEVER BE ENOUGH TAXATION, OR SOCIAL WELFARE FOR THEM.

Which brings me to this quote:

[BThe road to hell is paved with good intentions.][/B]
 
I don't care about POLITICAL CORRECTNESS............................

Break out the clubs.
 
I've been posting for a very long time now. Not here, but on the AOL Message Boards and back into the ABUZZ days. Back to the 90's.

You can't reason with the far left. You can show a thousand facts and it doesn't matter. They believe in the Freedom of Speech as long as it's their view. If you disagree with them, they can down right NASTY.

I was very respectful for many years and just GAVE THE HELL UP ON THEM. They are LOST.

SO I FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE.

And if they DON'T LIKE THAT, THEY CAN GO TO HELL.

Define far left.

The Liberal Brigade. Charge, WE NEED MORE GOV'T, MORE TAXES, MORE SOCIAL SPENDING, DIVERSITY, AND ETC.

They border on be Socialist/Communist in their Idiology. There will NEVER BE ENOUGH TAXATION, OR SOCIAL WELFARE FOR THEM.

Which brings me to this quote:

[BThe road to hell is paved with good intentions.][/B]
You have issues with diversity?
 

Forum List

Back
Top