Why are republicans so stupid when it comes to Food Stamps?

Nope. If they qualify for one program they qualify for all and they apply for everything.

"If they qualify for one program they qualify for all "

Gawd you cupcakes are an ignorant bunch....


r92213shame.jpg

On top of free food via WIC and SNAP,utilities,housing,school lunches,bus passes, healthcare...

They also get fee cell phones.

Poor underprivileged people...so sad....so abused. :(


Yes, you left out the free trips to Cabo


fd358021e7599e8bdaa360cba0bc9b2a.jpg



2b3a2fb1a28b8a9d78b39da41ed308da.jpg
So...you got nothing but cut and paste propaganda. Not surprised.


As opposed to the rights demonizing the poor?
The "right" spends more time. Volunteering and donating to the poor...while the left pays them lip service.



Get out of the right wing bubble cupcake

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


A recent MIT study countered it finding:

In this paper, we first show that conservatives and liberals are equally generous in their donation habits. This pattern holds at both the individual and state level, and contradicts the conventional wisdom that partisans differ in their generosity. Second, we show that while levels of giving are roughly equivalent, liberals are much more likely to donate to secular organizations, and conservatives are more likely to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.


However, there is another issue to address which is: what to count as charity? All of these studies use the IRS definition of "charity" rather than the biblical definition. In the bible, God defines charity as giving to the needy without receiving, or expecting to receive, anything in return. Most "charity" conservatives give is in the form of tithes to their church. The vast majority of that money goes to salaries and building expenses -- for people and buildings that provide the giver with services. A tiny, miniscule fraction goes to the poor and needy.

So, in actuality, it seems that liberals give quite a bit more to biblical charity than conservatives.

.gospelpolitics


Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth
I'm not a "rightwinger" cupcake.

How about you stop spamming the thread with copy and paste propaganda?
 
Last edited:
"If they qualify for one program they qualify for all "

Gawd you cupcakes are an ignorant bunch....


r92213shame.jpg

Yes, you left out the free trips to Cabo


fd358021e7599e8bdaa360cba0bc9b2a.jpg



2b3a2fb1a28b8a9d78b39da41ed308da.jpg
So...you got nothing but cut and paste propaganda. Not surprised.


As opposed to the rights demonizing the poor?
The "right" spends more time. Volunteering and donating to the poor...while the left pays them lip service.



Get out of the right wing bubble cupcake

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


A recent MIT study countered it finding:

In this paper, we first show that conservatives and liberals are equally generous in their donation habits. This pattern holds at both the individual and state level, and contradicts the conventional wisdom that partisans differ in their generosity. Second, we show that while levels of giving are roughly equivalent, liberals are much more likely to donate to secular organizations, and conservatives are more likely to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.


However, there is another issue to address which is: what to count as charity? All of these studies use the IRS definition of "charity" rather than the biblical definition. In the bible, God defines charity as giving to the needy without receiving, or expecting to receive, anything in return. Most "charity" conservatives give is in the form of tithes to their church. The vast majority of that money goes to salaries and building expenses -- for people and buildings that provide the giver with services. A tiny, miniscule fraction goes to the poor and needy.

So, in actuality, it seems that liberals give quite a bit more to biblical charity than conservatives.

.gospelpolitics


Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth
I'm not a "rightwinger" cupcake.

How about you stop spamming the threat with copy and paste propaganda?
What propaganda? The right wing prefers to, "love on the rich" under our form of capitalism and "hate on the poor".
 

Show us one on Entitlement spending son.


Sure cupcake

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States


Most Federally Dependent States

Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State

Total Score

‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank

‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States

states%20dependency.jpg

Entitlement spending by President son. I cannot be side tracked.


Cupcake, why don't YOU present that since YOU want it.


But how about showing 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator policies versus Obama's?

How is that snowflake?


xBushObamaJobs.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TZqNTQat3O.jpg

You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)
 
"If they qualify for one program they qualify for all "

Gawd you cupcakes are an ignorant bunch....


r92213shame.jpg

Yes, you left out the free trips to Cabo


fd358021e7599e8bdaa360cba0bc9b2a.jpg



2b3a2fb1a28b8a9d78b39da41ed308da.jpg
So...you got nothing but cut and paste propaganda. Not surprised.


As opposed to the rights demonizing the poor?
The "right" spends more time. Volunteering and donating to the poor...while the left pays them lip service.



Get out of the right wing bubble cupcake

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


A recent MIT study countered it finding:

In this paper, we first show that conservatives and liberals are equally generous in their donation habits. This pattern holds at both the individual and state level, and contradicts the conventional wisdom that partisans differ in their generosity. Second, we show that while levels of giving are roughly equivalent, liberals are much more likely to donate to secular organizations, and conservatives are more likely to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.


However, there is another issue to address which is: what to count as charity? All of these studies use the IRS definition of "charity" rather than the biblical definition. In the bible, God defines charity as giving to the needy without receiving, or expecting to receive, anything in return. Most "charity" conservatives give is in the form of tithes to their church. The vast majority of that money goes to salaries and building expenses -- for people and buildings that provide the giver with services. A tiny, miniscule fraction goes to the poor and needy.

So, in actuality, it seems that liberals give quite a bit more to biblical charity than conservatives.

.gospelpolitics


Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth
I'm not a "rightwinger" cupcake.

How about you stop spamming the thread with copy and paste propaganda?


Sure you aren't cupcake :)
 
Show us one on Entitlement spending son.


Sure cupcake

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States


Most Federally Dependent States

Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State

Total Score

‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank

‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States

states%20dependency.jpg

Entitlement spending by President son. I cannot be side tracked.


Cupcake, why don't YOU present that since YOU want it.


But how about showing 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator policies versus Obama's?

How is that snowflake?


xBushObamaJobs.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TZqNTQat3O.jpg

You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)

Little boy the OP is about entitlements. It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend .
 
"If they qualify for one program they qualify for all "

Gawd you cupcakes are an ignorant bunch....


r92213shame.jpg

Yes, you left out the free trips to Cabo


fd358021e7599e8bdaa360cba0bc9b2a.jpg



2b3a2fb1a28b8a9d78b39da41ed308da.jpg
So...you got nothing but cut and paste propaganda. Not surprised.


As opposed to the rights demonizing the poor?
The "right" spends more time. Volunteering and donating to the poor...while the left pays them lip service.



Get out of the right wing bubble cupcake

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


A recent MIT study countered it finding:

In this paper, we first show that conservatives and liberals are equally generous in their donation habits. This pattern holds at both the individual and state level, and contradicts the conventional wisdom that partisans differ in their generosity. Second, we show that while levels of giving are roughly equivalent, liberals are much more likely to donate to secular organizations, and conservatives are more likely to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.


However, there is another issue to address which is: what to count as charity? All of these studies use the IRS definition of "charity" rather than the biblical definition. In the bible, God defines charity as giving to the needy without receiving, or expecting to receive, anything in return. Most "charity" conservatives give is in the form of tithes to their church. The vast majority of that money goes to salaries and building expenses -- for people and buildings that provide the giver with services. A tiny, miniscule fraction goes to the poor and needy.

So, in actuality, it seems that liberals give quite a bit more to biblical charity than conservatives.

.gospelpolitics


Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth
I'm not a "rightwinger" cupcake.

How about you stop spamming the thread with copy and paste propaganda?

NOT going to try to back up YOUR assertion on charity huh cupcake? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you :)
 
Sure cupcake

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States


Most Federally Dependent States

Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State

Total Score

‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank

‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States

states%20dependency.jpg

Entitlement spending by President son. I cannot be side tracked.


Cupcake, why don't YOU present that since YOU want it.


But how about showing 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator policies versus Obama's?

How is that snowflake?


xBushObamaJobs.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TZqNTQat3O.jpg

You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)

Little boy the OP is about entitlements. It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend .


Sorry cupcake, don't ask others for something YOU want, IF you can find it great :(
 
Food stamp use increased 70% during the Obama years. Is that good news or bad news to the left?
Well we did have the great recession...did you consider that or jump straight to "Obama's fault"? Not saying it's the only possible reason but the world has far more impactful forces than that of one man in the highest office.
Obama's 2nd run was Make America Great Again and all he cared about was UHC and kissing Muslim ass.


Sure Cupcake

DPCCPrivateSectorPayroll120216.png



340615dfba883717d505604b8bbca539.jpg
 
Entitlement spending by President son. I cannot be side tracked.


Cupcake, why don't YOU present that since YOU want it.


But how about showing 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator policies versus Obama's?

How is that snowflake?


xBushObamaJobs.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TZqNTQat3O.jpg

You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)

Little boy the OP is about entitlements. It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend .


Sorry cupcake, don't ask others for something YOU want, IF you can find it great :(

You look pretty stupid here kid, sorry. The thread is about entitlements, you want to deflect an change the topic. I won't let you. If you can't answer that's fine. I enjoy slapping you around.
 
Cupcake, why don't YOU present that since YOU want it.


But how about showing 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator policies versus Obama's?

How is that snowflake?


xBushObamaJobs.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TZqNTQat3O.jpg

You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)

Little boy the OP is about entitlements. It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend .


Sorry cupcake, don't ask others for something YOU want, IF you can find it great :(

You look pretty stupid here kid, sorry. The thread is about entitlements, you want to deflect an change the topic. I won't let you. If you can't answer that's fine. I enjoy slapping you around.

Sure cupcake, you've done that *shaking head*

I'm sorry is there some reason you can't find entitlement charts YOU like?

1maiw9.jpg



23 Million Fewer Americans Would Have Health Coverage Under Obamacare Repeal Plan, Budget Office Confirms

Trump's Budget Cuts Deeply Into Medicaid and Anti-Poverty Efforts

Trump to propose big cuts to safety net in new budget, slashing Medicaid and opening door to other limits

Trump to propose big cuts to safety net in new budget this week

chart.jpg



GOP+rich+v+poor.jpg
 
They aren't stupid. They are evil. These are the people God wanted drowned.
 
1) The cost of food stamps is a small fraction of the overall welfare budget

2) 2/3 of those on food stamps are kids

3) Few people even qualify for food stamps because it is reserved for the poorest of the poor. It's a program way behind on the rate of inflation as well.

4) Some Veterans are on food stamps.

5) Any adult on food stamps has a job

Republicans in congress are either complete assholes or are willfully ignorant.

But hey i get it: it gives republicans hard ons to say "i don't need a handout! I provide! I'm tough as nails! Derp, derp, derp!" They then pretend complete falsehoods or stereotypes about the program because it makes them feel more manly i guess.

Why can't facts ever permeate the republican bubble?
Okay we see you are worried about losing your benefits. Get over it, the Obama era is over with.
 
jon do you realize that you look very stupid by trying to argue with cartoons as if you were a child? Is your idea of debate both sides flashing cartoons at each other? See why we are sure that liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?
 
I am all for helping those who are poor, but the current system is broken. Give vouchers that must be used for certain foods only....milk, eggs, bread, milk, cheese, oatmeal, canned meats, fruit/veg, etc. You don't see too many food stamp users buying canned tuna.....just saying

How do you know ?

When I was young I worked at a supermarket. Most tried to get the bang for the buck . Sure u suspected some frauds . No one is for that .

Logistically , it would be more trouble to pull off your plan . And what's the point really?
I saw a girl buy 4 20 oz mountain dews on food stamps. Why not buy a 2 liter, much cheaper. Then with money bought a couple pack of smokes. I have no sympathy.
 
You're dismissed kid. The thread is about ENTITLEMENT spending.

Cupcake, IF you want to make an assertion about it, just do it, don't ask others to do it for you :)

Little boy the OP is about entitlements. It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend .


Sorry cupcake, don't ask others for something YOU want, IF you can find it great :(

You look pretty stupid here kid, sorry. The thread is about entitlements, you want to deflect an change the topic. I won't let you. If you can't answer that's fine. I enjoy slapping you around.

Sure cupcake, you've done that *shaking head*

I'm sorry is there some reason you can't find entitlement charts YOU like?

1maiw9.jpg



23 Million Fewer Americans Would Have Health Coverage Under Obamacare Repeal Plan, Budget Office Confirms

Trump's Budget Cuts Deeply Into Medicaid and Anti-Poverty Efforts

Trump to propose big cuts to safety net in new budget, slashing Medicaid and opening door to other limits

Trump to propose big cuts to safety net in new budget this week

chart.jpg



GOP+rich+v+poor.jpg

Son you are the one who inserted a Budget chart to make a point in a thread about entitlements.
 
Food stamp use increased 70% during the Obama years. Is that good news or bad news to the left?
Well we did have the great recession...did you consider that or jump straight to "Obama's fault"? Not saying it's the only possible reason but the world has far more impactful forces than that of one man in the highest office.

I think some would find it reasonable that it shot up right after the recession, but DumBama put an increase in food stamps as part of his Pork Bill. I guess he thought poor people were too skinny.

But the usage of food stamps was still high long after the recession technically ended, and remains high today.

See, I thought the Democrats said how great of a job DumBama did with the economy. If that's so, why is food stamp usage still so high?

Food-Stamps-China.png
 
I am all for helping those who are poor, but the current system is broken. Give vouchers that must be used for certain foods only....milk, eggs, bread, milk, cheese, oatmeal, canned meats, fruit/veg, etc. You don't see too many food stamp users buying canned tuna.....just saying

How do you know ?

When I was young I worked at a supermarket. Most tried to get the bang for the buck . Sure u suspected some frauds . No one is for that .

Logistically , it would be more trouble to pull off your plan . And what's the point really?
I saw a girl buy 4 20 oz mountain dews on food stamps. Why not buy a 2 liter, much cheaper. Then with money bought a couple pack of smokes. I have no sympathy.

Yeah I hate that . Like I said , I worked at a supermarket and saw some questionable shopping habits . But you want to throw the baby out with the bath water ?

How bout some sensible fixes ? With the bet cards , its harder to commit fraud .
 

Forum List

Back
Top