beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 44,126
- 16,453
. It's called being corrupted to the inth degree.no, the FBI was RIGHT when it said there was NO EVIDENCE of Hillary's server being hacked....there is forensic evidence the DNC was hacked by the Russians, and evidence of hacking credit card accounts with the same footprint of the hackers, and the same footprint left for the hacking of Ukraine's election and the Ukraine's power grid and same footprint left on the hacking of Podesta emails and the same Russian footprint on the hackers of the Vermont power grid...
There was no hacking of Hillary's server and no evidence left of any hacking of her server, no footprint left behind....
AND not 1 single itty bitty email from Hillary's server was ever released by any hacking/hackers.....
NOT ONE!!!
But you all want to continue to lie like rugs....about it.
you sure are people of good character, aren't cha?
There was "no hacking of Hillary's server?" You know the FBI is wrong how exactly?
NONE that any of the many FBI Agents working the case could find... yet they could find the DNC hacks, the Podesta hacks, the Vermont electric grid hacks, the Ukraine election hacks, the Ukraine power grid hacks, the thousands upon thousands of State Dept hacks last year alone, but for some reason these imaginary hackers in your head, used a method of hacking on Hillary's server that could not be traced and left zero evidence behind....
sure sparky, sure...that's the ticket!
Comey said that while she was overseas, using her blackberry phone, the possibility of hacking was high... that had nothing to do with her server.
ALL LIARS will be thrown in to the lake of fire in the end...be careful!![]()
Swish. I didn't dispute the FBI said there was no evidence.
I disputed your claim the server was not hacked when the FBI said there almost certainly would be no evidence, it's clear our enemies knew about the server and it almost certainly was hacked.
Hence my question, you know the FBI is wrong ... how ???
His argument is so flimsy--he wants to prove a negative. That no one released the emails, so obviously despite the known fact that foreign hostile actors knew of the existence of Clinton's illegal server, the same people that hacked the much more secured DNC server were dumbfounded as to how to access Clinton's bathroom server.
This is the logical depth of liberals. They can hold complete contradictory ideas and beliefs in their mind in complete harmony. Straw men, proving a negative--they rely on endless logical fallacies to justify their ever changing, illogical positions.