Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[danielpalos]

It means I would go on unemployment for one dollar an hour less than the current minimum wage. Let's assume it is fifteen dollars for the minimum wage. The unemployment compensation wage would be fourteen dollars an hour. Your firm would only be assessed general taxes for unemployment compensation not our burdensome, current regime.

By solving simple poverty in our Republic.

How would that work? A good employer may have 100 people show up and want work, so he would need to pay 100 people $14 an hour for not working? At $1400 an hour that business would either fail or raise prices to compensate for the extra cost. That seems intrusive and burdensome.

I’d hire you and for $1 an hour more have you and every other applicant scrub my floors with a toothbrush and make you do every other terrible task.

Then you be happy spending 8 hours a day on your hands and knees scrubbing.

Employment is at-will. You won't need to hire anyone. They would just go on unemployment compensation.

You would only have to pay your employees a minimum wage or more.

And, be assessed a general tax for unemployment compensation if necessary. It would be less expensive because you would not need to deal with unemployment issues.

How do you run a business if you don’t hire anyone? Where does the money come from to pay for the unemployed? You said the business would be responsible for those they don’t hire. You are not clear on how this would work.

It is up to the Individual to stay poor on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

It is being paid now; I recommend simplification to complete coverage and lower costs.

Nope; employment is at-will. No more expenses in that sector from at-will employment issues.

Healthcare reform and a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage. I don't mind if the right wing, "sits out the next election cycle."

You are for healthcare reform, what does that mean? I’m all for healthcare reform.

What kind of healthcare reform? How would it work, what would be the key issues it would settle? How do you keep the cost down? Who would benefit? How would you take care of the existing system? How would it be implemented? Who would pay? How would it work after the failure of Obamacare? How would the medical profession be paid?

Actually, this may happen by itself, if we can solve simple poverty. Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Again, you claim you want reform and now you claim it will fix itself. Could you clarify.

A, "two for one deal"?

Just say you can't clarify, it is much simpler than pretending you have an idea.

by solving simple poverty; Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

 

[Thinker101]

Ok, and what social costs need to be considered?

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

the alternative to welfare.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

Great, let's cut social services to 10/hour.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, I am. That is You, not me. In any case, why do You care if I want to stay poor on an at-will basis?

You can if you want, just don't expect the taxpayers to subsidize your lifestyle. Be honest and say you want to be on welfare and stop trying to call it UE. UE was created to help carry people to the next job who were let go through no fault of their own.

The point is, silly right winger who never gets it, to lower costs. Unemployment insurance is simply more cost effective.

You still don't get paid if you can work, but won't.

Only if the employers believe in a natural rate of unemployment.

No, because no one wants to give you what you don't earn, and don't need but can't get on your own.

Solving for socioeconomic problems in is our Constitution; it is termed and styled, providing for the general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

the alternative to welfare.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

Great, let's cut social services to 10/hour.

Only the right wing is that cheap. Why not end our drug war.

 

[Thinker101]

How about answering the question...dumbass.

the alternative to welfare.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

Great, let's cut social services to 10/hour.

Only the right wing is that cheap. Why not end our drug war.

Why not slither back under your rock....dumbass.

 

[danielpalos]

the alternative to welfare.

How about answering the question...dumbass.

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

Great, let's cut social services to 10/hour.

Only the right wing is that cheap. Why not end our drug war.

Why not slither back under your rock....dumbass.

I have more than, nothing but repeal.

 

[Papageorgio]

How would that work? A good employer may have 100 people show up and want work, so he would need to pay 100 people $14 an hour for not working? At $1400 an hour that business would either fail or raise prices to compensate for the extra cost. That seems intrusive and burdensome.

I’d hire you and for $1 an hour more have you and every other applicant scrub my floors with a toothbrush and make you do every other terrible task.

Then you be happy spending 8 hours a day on your hands and knees scrubbing.

Employment is at-will. You won't need to hire anyone. They would just go on unemployment compensation.

You would only have to pay your employees a minimum wage or more.

And, be assessed a general tax for unemployment compensation if necessary. It would be less expensive because you would not need to deal with unemployment issues.

How do you run a business if you don’t hire anyone? Where does the money come from to pay for the unemployed? You said the business would be responsible for those they don’t hire. You are not clear on how this would work.

It is up to the Individual to stay poor on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

It is being paid now; I recommend simplification to complete coverage and lower costs.

Nope; employment is at-will. No more expenses in that sector from at-will employment issues.

You are for healthcare reform, what does that mean? I’m all for healthcare reform.

What kind of healthcare reform? How would it work, what would be the key issues it would settle? How do you keep the cost down? Who would benefit? How would you take care of the existing system? How would it be implemented? Who would pay? How would it work after the failure of Obamacare? How would the medical profession be paid?

Actually, this may happen by itself, if we can solve simple poverty. Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Again, you claim you want reform and now you claim it will fix itself. Could you clarify.

A, "two for one deal"?

Just say you can't clarify, it is much simpler than pretending you have an idea.

by solving simple poverty; Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Solving simple poverty is not simple and it takes lots of money, the initial costs would be prohibitive. We can even fund SSI and Medicare, it is breaking us and that was already funded.

 

[koshergrl]

They want welfare because welfare is their replacement for slavery. They need a dependent class in order to justify their existence.

 

[danielpalos]

Employment is at-will. You won't need to hire anyone. They would just go on unemployment compensation.

You would only have to pay your employees a minimum wage or more.

And, be assessed a general tax for unemployment compensation if necessary. It would be less expensive because you would not need to deal with unemployment issues.

How do you run a business if you don’t hire anyone? Where does the money come from to pay for the unemployed? You said the business would be responsible for those they don’t hire. You are not clear on how this would work.

It is up to the Individual to stay poor on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

It is being paid now; I recommend simplification to complete coverage and lower costs.

Nope; employment is at-will. No more expenses in that sector from at-will employment issues.

Actually, this may happen by itself, if we can solve simple poverty. Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Again, you claim you want reform and now you claim it will fix itself. Could you clarify.

A, "two for one deal"?

Just say you can't clarify, it is much simpler than pretending you have an idea.

by solving simple poverty; Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Solving simple poverty is not simple and it takes lots of money, the initial costs would be prohibitive. We can even fund SSI and Medicare, it is breaking us and that was already funded.

Simple poverty can be solved on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. That is pretty efficient.

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution, providing for the general warfare is not.

 

[irosie91]

They want welfare because welfare is their replacement for slavery. They need a dependent class in order to justify their existence.

Food stamps feed children

 

[danielpalos]

They want welfare because welfare is their replacement for slavery. They need a dependent class in order to justify their existence.

You just have a bad attitude; need a full body massage?

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare and refusing to pay for it with appropriate tax rates is not.

 

[Papageorgio]

How do you run a business if you don’t hire anyone? Where does the money come from to pay for the unemployed? You said the business would be responsible for those they don’t hire. You are not clear on how this would work.

It is up to the Individual to stay poor on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

It is being paid now; I recommend simplification to complete coverage and lower costs.

Nope; employment is at-will. No more expenses in that sector from at-will employment issues.

Again, you claim you want reform and now you claim it will fix itself. Could you clarify.

A, "two for one deal"?

Just say you can't clarify, it is much simpler than pretending you have an idea.

by solving simple poverty; Market based products should appear to meet that new demand. In that manner, insurance products will be available which should help lower our costs via normal market forces.

Solving simple poverty is not simple and it takes lots of money, the initial costs would be prohibitive. We can even fund SSI and Medicare, it is breaking us and that was already funded.

Simple poverty can be solved on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. That is pretty efficient.

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution, providing for the general warfare is not.

You still haven’t explained how it wouldn’t cost but I don’t expect it, all you have is cliches and no real ideas.

 

[Wry Catcher]

First of all 59 pages based on a troll's comment and a link to simple solutions is absurd.

Callous conservatives (CC) hold two beliefs to be basic truths: Those who need government assistance are lazy reprobates who want free stuff, and those with enormous wealth are godly and deserve all that they have. At least that's what is expressed by the CC's above.

Any argument with a CC is a waste of time. Suffice it to consider this:

Both beliefs are the opening statements of a false narrative, as is the title of this thread.

 

[Papageorgio]

First of all 59 pages based on a troll's comment and a link to simple solutions is absurd.

Callous conservatives (CC) hold two beliefs to be basic truths: Those who need government assistance are lazy reprobates who want free stuff, and those with enormous wealth are godly and deserve all that they have. At least that's what is expressed by the CC's above.

Any argument with a CC is a waste of time. Suffice it to consider this:

Both beliefs are the opening statements of a false narrative, as is the title of this thread.

Look another troll trying to push their false statements and crying about other trolls and their false statements, it is pretty funny.

 

[Wry Catcher]

First of all 59 pages based on a troll's comment and a link to simple solutions is absurd.

Callous conservatives (CC) hold two beliefs to be basic truths: Those who need government assistance are lazy reprobates who want free stuff, and those with enormous wealth are godly and deserve all that they have. At least that's what is expressed by the CC's above.

Any argument with a CC is a waste of time. Suffice it to consider this:

Both beliefs are the opening statements of a false narrative, as is the title of this thread.

Look another troll trying to push their false statements and crying about other trolls and their false statements, it is pretty funny.

It's all about the facts, Friday, all about the facts. Something alien to the right wing so stuck in denial and and suffering cognitive dissonance. Take two Xanax and smoke a joint - you might then experience a breakthrough.

 

[Papageorgio]

First of all 59 pages based on a troll's comment and a link to simple solutions is absurd.

Callous conservatives (CC) hold two beliefs to be basic truths: Those who need government assistance are lazy reprobates who want free stuff, and those with enormous wealth are godly and deserve all that they have. At least that's what is expressed by the CC's above.

Any argument with a CC is a waste of time. Suffice it to consider this:

Both beliefs are the opening statements of a false narrative, as is the title of this thread.

Look another troll trying to push their false statements and crying about other trolls and their false statements, it is pretty funny.

It's all about the facts, Friday, all about the facts. Something alien to the right wing so stuck in denial and and suffering cognitive dissonance. Take two Xanax and smoke a joint - you might then experience a breakthrough.

You know from my perspective both sides lie, make dumb generalizations and add nothing, just as I pointed out in your post. Maybe if you laid off the Xanax and pot you might begin to think again before your next post, otherwise you are no different than shootspeeders, just a hateful whacko.

 

[hadit]

You can if you want, just don't expect the taxpayers to subsidize your lifestyle. Be honest and say you want to be on welfare and stop trying to call it UE. UE was created to help carry people to the next job who were let go through no fault of their own.

The point is, silly right winger who never gets it, to lower costs. Unemployment insurance is simply more cost effective.

You still don't get paid if you can work, but won't.

Only if the employers believe in a natural rate of unemployment.

No, because no one wants to give you what you don't earn, and don't need but can't get on your own.

Solving for socioeconomic problems in is our Constitution; it is termed and styled, providing for the general welfare.

That has nothing to do with your desire to live off others' hard work.

 

[Dschrute3]

It creates a permanent voter-base. Most people who rely on Government to take care of them, will support the Democratic Party. It's a vote for more Freebies. Democrats see no profit in Citizens being independent and prosperous. They need folks to be bitter and impoverished. They need their 'Victims.'

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They want welfare because welfare is their replacement for slavery. They need a dependent class in order to justify their existence.

Food stamps feed children

Yeah, to think one time parents used to do that.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

Food stamps and welfare checks buy loyal voters. People with jobs aren't gonna vote for politicians who give out free stuff to people who won't work.

God forbid the Middle Class gets to keep more of its paycheck while Democrats expand government. They run up the bill wrecklessly and demand the taxpayer pay more.