Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.It is not a zero sum game. You simply are clueless and Causeless about economics, positive multiplier effects, and "growing the size of the economic pie".What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally."Phased in" how? Because "phased in" or not, it would still mean the doubling of government spending with no real gain. People that have money, work hard for their money will be forced to give more to people that choose not to work hard and sponge of the rest of the country. Nothing noble in taking other people's money for your own needs, that is called being selfish.
Because you are taking money from the working class and giving it to the poor class, both spend money, you aren't creating more money, you are robbing Peter to pay Paul, that is not noble, it is selfish.
If I have $5 and I am going to spend it at the grocery store and you take my $5 and spend it at the grocery store, nothing is added to the economy. I worked for the money you took it and spent it. What gain to the economy is there?
Now, if I had a business and hired you and gave you a pay check for helping me produce goods or services that others purchased, then you would have money, there is a cost benefit relationship and we have all improved the economy.
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.It is not a zero sum game. You simply are clueless and Causeless about economics, positive multiplier effects, and "growing the size of the economic pie".What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally.
Because you are taking money from the working class and giving it to the poor class, both spend money, you aren't creating more money, you are robbing Peter to pay Paul, that is not noble, it is selfish.
If I have $5 and I am going to spend it at the grocery store and you take my $5 and spend it at the grocery store, nothing is added to the economy. I worked for the money you took it and spent it. What gain to the economy is there?
Now, if I had a business and hired you and gave you a pay check for helping me produce goods or services that others purchased, then you would have money, there is a cost benefit relationship and we have all improved the economy.
You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.It is not a zero sum game. You simply are clueless and Causeless about economics, positive multiplier effects, and "growing the size of the economic pie".Because you are taking money from the working class and giving it to the poor class, both spend money, you aren't creating more money, you are robbing Peter to pay Paul, that is not noble, it is selfish.
If I have $5 and I am going to spend it at the grocery store and you take my $5 and spend it at the grocery store, nothing is added to the economy. I worked for the money you took it and spent it. What gain to the economy is there?
Now, if I had a business and hired you and gave you a pay check for helping me produce goods or services that others purchased, then you would have money, there is a cost benefit relationship and we have all improved the economy.
You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.It is not a zero sum game. You simply are clueless and Causeless about economics, positive multiplier effects, and "growing the size of the economic pie".
If I have $5 and I am going to spend it at the grocery store and you take my $5 and spend it at the grocery store, nothing is added to the economy. I worked for the money you took it and spent it. What gain to the economy is there?
Now, if I had a business and hired you and gave you a pay check for helping me produce goods or services that others purchased, then you would have money, there is a cost benefit relationship and we have all improved the economy.
You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.
Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.If I have $5 and I am going to spend it at the grocery store and you take my $5 and spend it at the grocery store, nothing is added to the economy. I worked for the money you took it and spent it. What gain to the economy is there?
Now, if I had a business and hired you and gave you a pay check for helping me produce goods or services that others purchased, then you would have money, there is a cost benefit relationship and we have all improved the economy.
You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.
Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.
That is not how it works. It is not a zero sum game.
You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.
Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.
Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
that is the law.Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.You need to attract the life you want, not depend on others to take care of your needs and wants. Governments and people can let you down, however you can attract what you want, find what you love to do and never want for anything, it is the LAW!
Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally.Yes, we do. It would need to be phased in. It would be no worse than QE, but much more noticeable on any given local economy. Why do you have a problem with using capitalism to recirculate money.You're again ignoring several things:
1. We don't have enough money to do that.
2. You're taking money from people who would spend it and giving it to people who would spend it. No gain there.
"Phased in" how? Because "phased in" or not, it would still mean the doubling of government spending with no real gain. People that have money, work hard for their money will be forced to give more to people that choose not to work hard and sponge of the rest of the country. Nothing noble in taking other people's money for your own needs, that is called being selfish.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
The law is employment at will.that is the law.Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.dude; the rich get bailed out all the time.
Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
Not sure how that applies with what I posted. Which law are you talking about, there are many laws.
Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally.Yes, we do. It would need to be phased in. It would be no worse than QE, but much more noticeable on any given local economy. Why do you have a problem with using capitalism to recirculate money.
"Phased in" how? Because "phased in" or not, it would still mean the doubling of government spending with no real gain. People that have money, work hard for their money will be forced to give more to people that choose not to work hard and sponge of the rest of the country. Nothing noble in taking other people's money for your own needs, that is called being selfish.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
The law is employment at will.that is the law.Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.Dude, I said nothing about the rich, I was talking about the LAW!
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
Not sure how that applies with what I posted. Which law are you talking about, there are many laws.
Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally."Phased in" how? Because "phased in" or not, it would still mean the doubling of government spending with no real gain. People that have money, work hard for their money will be forced to give more to people that choose not to work hard and sponge of the rest of the country. Nothing noble in taking other people's money for your own needs, that is called being selfish.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
Ridiculous.Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally."Phased in" how? Because "phased in" or not, it would still mean the doubling of government spending with no real gain. People that have money, work hard for their money will be forced to give more to people that choose not to work hard and sponge of the rest of the country. Nothing noble in taking other people's money for your own needs, that is called being selfish.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
State law, right wingers. Not right wing or left wing law.The law is employment at will.that is the law.Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.that is the law; it is OK to bailout rich real and rich artificial Persons as Individuals as part of the general welfare.
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
Not sure how that applies with what I posted. Which law are you talking about, there are many laws.
That is your law, I am not bound by your law, I am bound by my LAW.
That is why our infrastructure is falling behind.Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
No it doesn't it goes from one to the other, no infrastructure involved.
We should have the finest infrastructure money can buy, with a One Percenter in office.Ridiculous.Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.What do you mean by, "no real gain"? People would spending that money in local economies and that money would be taxed locally.
You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
State law, right wingers. Not right wing or left wing law.The law is employment at will.that is the law.Then that is YOUR law and that is your reality.
I attract the life I want, that is MY LAW, I attract what I want and do not focus on what I don't want, because that is how the LAW works. It works the same for everyone, rich or poor.
Not sure how that applies with what I posted. Which law are you talking about, there are many laws.
That is your law, I am not bound by your law, I am bound by my LAW.
That is why our infrastructure is falling behind.Infrastructure.this is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.You might as well take a gallon of water from the deep end of the pool, dump it in the shallow end, then scoop a teaspoon back out of the shallow end and dump it in the middle.
people spending money creates demand.
What's the difference to the economy if I spend money or if you rob me and spend the same money?
No it doesn't it goes from one to the other, no infrastructure involved.
The law is employment at will in any at-will employment State.State law, right wingers. Not right wing or left wing law.The law is employment at will.that is the law.
Not sure how that applies with what I posted. Which law are you talking about, there are many laws.
That is your law, I am not bound by your law, I am bound by my LAW.
Not left or right. Your law has no bearing on my LAW.
Bless Donald Trump
