Let's make this easy to comprehend. Any law regulating immigration into the US, including the punishments for breaching that process.Why is it our job to prove a negative?No, I'm asking you (and bripat) to do it, since you're the ones claiming that it's as simple as "enforcing the law". If it's so simple, it shouldn't be hard.
Providing me with the law that you are claiming should be enforced, but is not is not asking you to "proving a negative", it's asking you to back up your claim. Stating that there is a "simple" solution to immigration, and that is enforcing the "law" is not a negative claim, it's a positive one.
You are the one who has said this is "simple", but now it appears that you can't even tell me which laws should be enforced?
You're not getting it.
It's not "easy to comprehend". There are countless laws, each saying different things, many of them contradictory.
That's my point - and the fact that you still can't actually provide the laws that you think should be enforced is kind of proving it.
There are no laws that say foreigners can reside in this country without a valid visa.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
The laws in this country don't specific what people can do, they specify what they can't do.