Spoonman
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2010
- 18,163
- 7,661
- 330
![]()
Do repubs vote for republicans to keep the govt gravy train chugging along?
so lets end it. We're game, are you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
![]()
Do repubs vote for republicans to keep the govt gravy train chugging along?
The chart proves nothing along the lines of your original assertion... you WANT it to, but it is like saying NY is a DEM state, the overall populace of NY spends more on gay sex toys than other states, so all DEMs in NY partake in gay sexBolded: Those "facts" never existed. BUT it does show that red states across the board are welfare whores. Across the board.
Now explain (or dont) that all you want but thats a fact
Hence, you have no actual correlation to your statement...
The government money is not inherently WELFARE money.. there is no correlation between those actually receiving welfare money and political affiliation.. There is no proof or correlation that because a state that overall votes 1 way for representation (in the recent timeframe) has the same majority in government assistance statistics based on party affiliation
You are full of shit, and so is your silly assumption, troll
Translation: Nuhhh uhhh.
I dont have to prove it. The chart proves enough and you have nothing for it but whine.
Whine some more this time face the chart while you do it
The chart proves nothing along the lines of your original assertion... you WANT it to, but it is like saying NY is a DEM state, the overall populace of NY spends more on gay sex toys than other states, so all DEMs in NY partake in gay sexHence, you have no actual correlation to your statement...
The government money is not inherently WELFARE money.. there is no correlation between those actually receiving welfare money and political affiliation.. There is no proof or correlation that because a state that overall votes 1 way for representation (in the recent timeframe) has the same majority in government assistance statistics based on party affiliation
You are full of shit, and so is your silly assumption, troll
Translation: Nuhhh uhhh.
I dont have to prove it. The chart proves enough and you have nothing for it but whine.
Whine some more this time face the chart while you do it
You have no logical way to make your assertion based on the data given
You are a fucking troll
![]()
Do repubs vote for republicans to keep the govt gravy train chugging along?
so lets end it. We're game, are you?
I seriously doubt there is a minority that the left won't USE for their political fodder. Hearing them yell, "whoopee look at me we got a black friend in the WH." Now with the welfare mantra as if the way a state votes has anything to do with who is on welfare. Using the poor for political points is really a new low. It is one thing to discuss waste in the welfare system when the money is used to by cigarettes and booze. It is quite another to mock a whole state because they are poor.
I seriously doubt there is a minority that the left won't USE for their political fodder. Hearing them yell, "whoopee look at me we got a black friend in the WH." Now with the welfare mantra as if the way a state votes has anything to do with who is on welfare. Using the poor for political points is really a new low. It is one thing to discuss waste in the welfare system when the money is used to by cigarettes and booze. It is quite another to mock a whole state because they are poor.
All I'm saying is that if welfare stops someone from achieving and buys democratic votes how does all the red states vote red when dems obviously bought their votes?
That article is all over the place and didnt refute anything.
![]()
Do repubs vote for republicans to keep the govt gravy train chugging along?
so lets end it. We're game, are you?
Sure. Now just get all those other repubs mouths off the tit and get them to agree with you.
They will *wink wink*
NOW you've gone and done it! He's gone to the nearest mirror chastising himself for agreeing with a Tea Party guy!so lets end it. We're game, are you?
Sure. Now just get all those other repubs mouths off the tit and get them to agree with you.
They will *wink wink*
get on your president. he seems the one intent on expanding it. you must agree with Ted Cruz and the tea party. that's kind of their thinking too
Hence, you have no actual correlation to your statement...
The government money is not inherently WELFARE money.. there is no correlation between those actually receiving welfare money and political affiliation.. There is no proof or correlation that because a state that overall votes 1 way for representation (in the recent timeframe) has the same majority in government assistance statistics based on party affiliation
You are full of shit, and so is your silly assumption, troll
Translation: Nuhhh uhhh.
I dont have to prove it. The chart proves enough and you have nothing for it but whine.
Whine some more this time face the chart while you do it
your chart does not prove republicans use welfare dumbass
On what is the money being spent? Is it only a benifit to the state inwhich it is being spent, or is it a benifit to the entire nation. For example, I like having an interstate highway system to drive coast to coast. It's good to have military bases that train soldiers from anywhere in the nation. Do you want facilities to store or recycle nuclear waste in your blue state, or would you rather keep that radio active stuff in another state?
Translation: Nuhhh uhhh.
I dont have to prove it. The chart proves enough and you have nothing for it but whine.
Whine some more this time face the chart while you do it
your chart does not prove republicans use welfare dumbass
you were right Yurt....i showed him the "link" he asked for.....and he ignored it.....im not really surprised though.....a few of his buddies did the same......
On what is the money being spent? Is it only a benifit to the state inwhich it is being spent, or is it a benifit to the entire nation. For example, I like having an interstate highway system to drive coast to coast. It's good to have military bases that train soldiers from anywhere in the nation. Do you want facilities to store or recycle nuclear waste in your blue state, or would you rather keep that radio active stuff in another state?
what the liberal wing nuts who try to spin this data to a pro argument fail to realize is this data actually damns them and their claimed ideals. See the blue states are where the majority of the corporations and evil 1% live, who libs claim don't pay their fair share. They are the ones who provide the surplus. while the red states are made up of the workers, farmers, the middle and lower classes. looks to me like the evil 1% is paying their fair share after all
I seriously doubt there is a minority that the left won't USE for their political fodder. Hearing them yell, "whoopee look at me we got a black friend in the WH." Now with the welfare mantra as if the way a state votes has anything to do with who is on welfare. Using the poor for political points is really a new low. It is one thing to discuss waste in the welfare system when the money is used to by cigarettes and booze. It is quite another to mock a whole state because they are poor.
All I'm saying is that if welfare stops someone from achieving and buys democratic votes how does all the red states vote red when dems obviously bought their votes?
Its almost as if you dont make sense lol
you did?....show me where....i just went back and looked....the only person that quoted that post with the link was Dean....and that "link" that backed up when i said Ca. has 34% of the Countries welfare recipients was from UC San Diego.....hardly a right wing talking point site....your chart does not prove republicans use welfare dumbass
you were right Yurt....i showed him the "link" he asked for.....and he ignored it.....im not really surprised though.....a few of his buddies did the same......
I saw your link on Cali and I addressed it. What else do you want? An Attaboy?
What my chart does prove is states that vote republicans use up all the welfare. Thats a fact.
I'm sorry it hurts your talking points but if welfare bought dem votes then those red states would vote for Dems. Thats assuming those talking points make sense
State personal income in the past six quarters has increased mostly in red states and states run by Republican governors, TheBlaze reported earlier this month.
However, after TheBlaze noted this trend, a few readers argued that this was because red states typically receive the lions share of federal funding.
Do they really?
In a word: No. In fact, since 2000, solid blue states have received far more in federal funding than solid red states, a Blaze analysis finds.
This is a stupid baited thread.
Having said that, I doubt there is anyone in either party that is against a temporary safety net for those who have fallen into some bad times. What has occurred is that Welfare has become a career for far too many people in this country. The people who have used the system as a career have hurt it for those who actually need it for temporary support.