Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you have no science, call your opponents "deniers"
The only stupid people I've seen on this board are you and other denialist buddies.
Your in the solid company of the likes of; Slackstack, who doesn't know what photosynthesis is and SSaDhD who things that there is a "force" that makes energy flow.
When you have no science, call your opponents "deniers"
We don't need to believe in vaccines. They are not based on faith and don't rely on believe. We don't need to believe in diodes, or lasers, or liquid crystals.
Real science doesn't depend on belief, it depends on fact, observable and repeatable. That which relies on faith is religion, not science. People like Michael Mann and Abraham are Shamans, not scientists.
As a scientist, you must have solid evidence of what you claim.
What is it?
We don't need to believe in vaccines. They are not based on faith and don't rely on believe. We don't need to believe in diodes, or lasers, or liquid crystals.
Real science doesn't depend on belief, it depends on fact, observable and repeatable. That which relies on faith is religion, not science. People like Michael Mann and Abraham are Shamans, not scientists.
As a scientist, you must have solid evidence of what you claim.
What is it?
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
UNTESTABLE HYPOTHESIS=PSEUDO-SCIENCE.
Another of your braindead lies, walleyed. The Eartg's climate patterns are changing right now and many of the bewildered duped morons in your little cult of reality denial do indeed deny that this is happening, in spite of the massive amounts of clear evidence worldwide. A number of these idiots post their denial of the current rapidly changing climate patterns right here on this forum.
Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you denier cult cretins imagine that you "KNOW" many things that are actually complete bullshit. One of your more ignorant denier cult myths is this 'the climate is "ALWAYS CHANGING" nonsense. Climate means the reoccurring average weather conditions of a certain region, including temperature, rainfall, and wind, averaged over many years.
There have actually been many periods of relatively stable world climate patterns that remained stable for thousands, tens of thousands or even millions of years. Here's an example of an 80,000 year long period of relative worldwide climate stability.
Climate stability during the Pliocene warm period
Paleoceanography
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2003
Amy E. Draut1, Maureen E. Raymo2, Jerry F. McManus3, Delia W. Oppo3
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003PA000889
ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution climate record from a sediment core spanning an 80-kyr interval of time during the mid-Pliocene epoch, when warmer conditions and lower global ice volume prevailed worldwide. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses were made on benthic and planktonic foraminifera from ODP Site 981 in the North Atlantic. The amplitude and approximate recurrence interval of suborbital variations in these records are comparable to those of Holocene and marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11) records from the North Atlantic. We conclude that the mid-Pliocene warm interval was a time of relative climatic stability.
******
Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?
So your premise is that it varied markedly over 50 year intervals, first swinging wildly one way then returning back to it's stable point, thus presenting the illusion that it didn't change at all over the 70,000 years?
You have some evidence to back up that scenario?
Or are you just imagining shit again and believing it's reality?
Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?
So your premise is that it varied markedly over 50 year intervals, first swinging wildly one way then returning back to it's stable point, thus presenting the illusion that it didn't change at all over the 70,000 years?
You have some evidence to back up that scenario?
Or are you just imagining shit again and believing it's reality?
I asked a SERIOUS scientific question.. What is the TEMPORAL RESOLUTION of fossilized plankton as a temp. proxy?
If you want to present this as evidence of CLIMATE STABILITY -- we all ought to know how fine-tuned the proxy is... Do you not have any curiousity as to whether they can devine a decade,, a century, or a millenium?
Of course not --- you eat this shit up raw....
Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?
So your premise is that it varied markedly over 50 year intervals, first swinging wildly one way then returning back to it's stable point, thus presenting the illusion that it didn't change at all over the 70,000 years?
You have some evidence to back up that scenario?
Or are you just imagining shit again and believing it's reality?
I asked a SERIOUS scientific question.. What is the TEMPORAL RESOLUTION of fossilized plankton as a temp. proxy?
If you want to present this as evidence of CLIMATE STABILITY -- we all ought to know how fine-tuned the proxy is... Do you not have any curiousity as to whether they can devine a decade,, a century, or a millenium?
Of course not --- you eat this shit up raw....
AGWCult needs to be deprogrammed
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
As a scientist, you must have solid evidence of what you claim.
What is it?
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
UNTESTABLE HYPOTHESIS=PSEUDO-SCIENCE.
What do you scientists and their data and models say? Where is it published? I've been asking forever!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
WTF is this you numbskull?
Why isn't there one single experiment showing how 800PM of CO2 raises temperature?
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
WTF is this you numbskull?
Funny how you clowns haven't been able to come up with anything other than "the oceans ate my heat but I can't show it to you!"
WTF is this you numbskull?
Wow! That's huge!!!
What is that, 10 or 15 degrees Celsius? I'm convinced.
WTF is this you numbskull?
Wow! That's huge!!!
What is that, 10 or 15 degrees Celsius? I'm convinced.
This is funny as all get out given your sig: you don't know what a joule is, do you. And keep in mind that the point I was refuting was the numbskull westwall's claim that we couldn't show it to him.
Wow! That's huge!!!
What is that, 10 or 15 degrees Celsius? I'm convinced.
This is funny as all get out given your sig: you don't know what a joule is, do you. And keep in mind that the point I was refuting was the numbskull westwall's claim that we couldn't show it to him.
I do know what a joule is. So how many degrees increase was it? Show it to me.
This is funny as all get out given your sig: you don't know what a joule is, do you. And keep in mind that the point I was refuting was the numbskull westwall's claim that we couldn't show it to him.
I do know what a joule is. So how many degrees increase was it? Show it to me.
Where does this attitude come from that everybody owes you an explanation or data or education?
Are you helpless?
