Why do you MORONS keep insisting that Hillary won something?

[Auld Phart]

New York voted against their own native son, too. 87% of Manhattanites, otherwise known as Duh Donald's neighbors, voted for Hillary. That's how reviled this potato head is in his own community.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-york
Manhattan
Clinton: 515,481
Trump: 58,935

Yup, as usual, New York was true blue...

to the Blue party

 

[BluesLegend]

It must really suck for Hillary, after eating shit for decades, after putting up with her cheating pig of a husband and enduring public humiliation, it was finally her turn and victory was so close she could taste it. Then Trump snatched it away from her and she never saw it coming. Karma my friends.

 

[eddiew37]

How Hillary won ? By NOT having to put up with the abuse the scum in congress would throw at her Now we can give trump double the abuse repubs gave Obama

 

[PoliticalChic]

No evidence of any largescale illegal voting. Nice try though.

The evidence of illegals voting will come during the next election after they are removed.

Why wait???

Got it right now....

1. “If there is a recount in Michigan and Trump loses by a few votes, then it’s very plausible that noncitizen voting made a big difference. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that.”

Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama.

Richman applied those numbers to 2016:

The basic assumptions on which the extrapolation is based are that 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted, and that of the noncitizens who voted, 81.8 percent voted for Clinton and 17.5 percent voted for Trump. … 6.4 percent turnout among the roughly 20.3 million noncitizen adults in the U.S. would add only 834,318 votes to Clinton’s popular vote margin. This is little more than a third of the total margin. … Is it plausible that noncitizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes. Is it plausible that noncitizen votes account for the entire nationwide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.


“An issue of concern is that so many have voted that are not legally supposed to,” Miller told reporters in a conference call Monday.



Beyond the noncitizens voting study from Old Dominion, Miller pointed to the Pew study from 2012 that found 24 million voter registration records in the United States, or about 1 in 8, were “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.”

The Pew study further found “1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters,” that “12 million records contain an incorrect address,” and that “2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.”


“If 10 percent of noncitizens voted, it would likely make a popular vote difference,” Camarota told The Daily Signal. “It’s not the Electoral College [Trump] is upset about. It’s the popular vote. I wish he wouldn’t focus on it. Bill Clinton got just 43 percent of the vote in 1992. How many states did he win more than 50 percent of the vote in?”

Trump could be correct about the number of illegal votes, but there is no way to know,said Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with The Heritage Foundation who focuses on voter integrity issues."
Impact of Noncitizen Voters on the 2016 Election



And this thread:

Say Again...Who Won The Popular Vote??

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Of course Trump won the popular vote.

The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.

You're a fool....but even you must know that.


Don't you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The bimbo is a 2 time loser, in fact all totaled she lost 3 billion dollars pretending to be a viable candidate for President.

What did she win.

Well I heard she won her bout with John Podesta by a knockout after he told her that Trump won the election

All people have said is that she won the popular vote, which is an irrefutable fact,

contrary to what half the nuts on USMB are claiming.

They don't do math here on the USMB. That's why it's so confounding. Simple math.

The bimbo is a 2 time loser, in fact all totaled she lost 3 billion dollars pretending to be a viable candidate for President.

What did she win.

Well I heard she won her bout with John Podesta by a knockout after he told her that Trump won the election

All people have said is that she won the popular vote, which is an irrefutable fact,

contrary to what half the nuts on USMB are claiming.

They don't do math here on the USMB. That's why it's so confounding. Simple math.

Of course Trump won the popular vote.

The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.

You're a fool....but even you must know that.


Don't you?

 

[gw1110]

There is really No Way around it, the System Put into Place and Supported by the Dimocrats Failed Them...!

http://electoralmap.net/2016/results.php

 

[BluesLegend]

[

Very Likely, had HIllary won, the same could have been said about her.

Defending Trump by pointing out how much like Hillary he is.

Classic modern conservative madness!!

how silly you are.

the comment was about Hillarys low likeability numbers.
Not a comparison to Trump.

Some of us pointed out early on that Hillary is no Bill Clinton when it comes to political talent, she's not even in his league.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The evidence of illegals voting will come during the next election after they are removed.

Why wait???

Got it right now....

1. “If there is a recount in Michigan and Trump loses by a few votes, then it’s very plausible that noncitizen voting made a big difference. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that.”

Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama.

Richman applied those numbers to 2016:

The basic assumptions on which the extrapolation is based are that 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted, and that of the noncitizens who voted, 81.8 percent voted for Clinton and 17.5 percent voted for Trump. … 6.4 percent turnout among the roughly 20.3 million noncitizen adults in the U.S. would add only 834,318 votes to Clinton’s popular vote margin. This is little more than a third of the total margin. … Is it plausible that noncitizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes. Is it plausible that noncitizen votes account for the entire nationwide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.


“An issue of concern is that so many have voted that are not legally supposed to,” Miller told reporters in a conference call Monday.



Beyond the noncitizens voting study from Old Dominion, Miller pointed to the Pew study from 2012 that found 24 million voter registration records in the United States, or about 1 in 8, were “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.”

The Pew study further found “1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters,” that “12 million records contain an incorrect address,” and that “2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.”


“If 10 percent of noncitizens voted, it would likely make a popular vote difference,” Camarota told The Daily Signal. “It’s not the Electoral College [Trump] is upset about. It’s the popular vote. I wish he wouldn’t focus on it. Bill Clinton got just 43 percent of the vote in 1992. How many states did he win more than 50 percent of the vote in?”

Trump could be correct about the number of illegal votes, but there is no way to know,said Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with The Heritage Foundation who focuses on voter integrity issues."
Impact of Noncitizen Voters on the 2016 Election



And this thread:

Say Again...Who Won The Popular Vote??

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Nope, they elected one instead.

Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.

Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.

Did any illegal aliens vote?

How many?

 

[Coyote]

Why wait???

Got it right now....

1. “If there is a recount in Michigan and Trump loses by a few votes, then it’s very plausible that noncitizen voting made a big difference. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that.”

Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama.

Richman applied those numbers to 2016:

The basic assumptions on which the extrapolation is based are that 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted, and that of the noncitizens who voted, 81.8 percent voted for Clinton and 17.5 percent voted for Trump. … 6.4 percent turnout among the roughly 20.3 million noncitizen adults in the U.S. would add only 834,318 votes to Clinton’s popular vote margin. This is little more than a third of the total margin. … Is it plausible that noncitizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes. Is it plausible that noncitizen votes account for the entire nationwide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.


“An issue of concern is that so many have voted that are not legally supposed to,” Miller told reporters in a conference call Monday.



Beyond the noncitizens voting study from Old Dominion, Miller pointed to the Pew study from 2012 that found 24 million voter registration records in the United States, or about 1 in 8, were “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.”

The Pew study further found “1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters,” that “12 million records contain an incorrect address,” and that “2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.”


“If 10 percent of noncitizens voted, it would likely make a popular vote difference,” Camarota told The Daily Signal. “It’s not the Electoral College [Trump] is upset about. It’s the popular vote. I wish he wouldn’t focus on it. Bill Clinton got just 43 percent of the vote in 1992. How many states did he win more than 50 percent of the vote in?”

Trump could be correct about the number of illegal votes, but there is no way to know,said Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with The Heritage Foundation who focuses on voter integrity issues."
Impact of Noncitizen Voters on the 2016 Election



And this thread:

Say Again...Who Won The Popular Vote??

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Nope, they elected one instead.

Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.

Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.

Did any illegal aliens vote?

How many?

That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.

 

[TheDude]

ILMAO at popular vote, (i.e., "winning the popular vote is important"). Seriously dumb fucks, pull your heads out of the collective liberal bunghole. You're stupid, and that's in context.

 

[PoliticalChic]

New York voted against their own native son, too. 87% of Manhattanites, otherwise known as Duh Donald's neighbors, voted for Hillary. That's how reviled this potato head is in his own community.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-york
Manhattan
Clinton: 515,481
Trump: 58,935

Yup, as usual, New York was true blue...

to the Blue party

Let's not participate in their medial lie....it's the Red Party.


"The choice of colors in this divide is counter-intuitive to many international observers, as throughout the world, red is commonly the designated color for parties representing labor, socialist, and/or liberal interests [5] [6], which in the United States would be more closely correlated with the Democratic Party.

Similarly, blue is used in these countries to depict conservative parties which in the case of the United States would be a color more suitable for the Republicans. For example, in Canada party colors are deeply ingrained and historic and have been unchanged during the Twentieth Century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_state_vs._blue_state_divide

 

[NYcarbineer]

[

Very Likely, had HIllary won, the same could have been said about her.

Defending Trump by pointing out how much like Hillary he is.

Classic modern conservative madness!!

how silly you are.

the comment was about Hillarys low likeability numbers.
Not a comparison to Trump.

Some of us pointed out early on that Hillary is no Bill Clinton when it comes to political talent, she's not even in his league.

Some of us pointed out before you were on this board that running Hillary Clinton was a dumb idea.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Nope, they elected one instead.

Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.

Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.

Did any illegal aliens vote?

How many?

That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.

Glad you asked!


"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf


That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....


...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.

Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.


Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time

....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)

and...

b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....


....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????


You betcha'!!!!!!!


Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.

 

[Tom Horn]

She won the popular vote dude, you can pretend that's nothing, but it's not. It may not be the Big Prize, but it is still important. Now, the question is - why is it so important to you to diminish that?

What's important about winning two or three states Trump never campaigned in? If Trump had needed the most votes, he'd have gone to California and Illinois, and upstate New York. And I seriously doubt she won the popular vote given the amount of ballot-manipulation we saw in Michigan.

 

[Coyote]

The evidence of illegals voting will come during the next election after they are removed.

Why wait???

Got it right now....

1. “If there is a recount in Michigan and Trump loses by a few votes, then it’s very plausible that noncitizen voting made a big difference. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that.”

Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama.

Richman applied those numbers to 2016:

The basic assumptions on which the extrapolation is based are that 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted, and that of the noncitizens who voted, 81.8 percent voted for Clinton and 17.5 percent voted for Trump. … 6.4 percent turnout among the roughly 20.3 million noncitizen adults in the U.S. would add only 834,318 votes to Clinton’s popular vote margin. This is little more than a third of the total margin. … Is it plausible that noncitizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes. Is it plausible that noncitizen votes account for the entire nationwide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.


“An issue of concern is that so many have voted that are not legally supposed to,” Miller told reporters in a conference call Monday.



Beyond the noncitizens voting study from Old Dominion, Miller pointed to the Pew study from 2012 that found 24 million voter registration records in the United States, or about 1 in 8, were “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.”

The Pew study further found “1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters,” that “12 million records contain an incorrect address,” and that “2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.”


“If 10 percent of noncitizens voted, it would likely make a popular vote difference,” Camarota told The Daily Signal. “It’s not the Electoral College [Trump] is upset about. It’s the popular vote. I wish he wouldn’t focus on it. Bill Clinton got just 43 percent of the vote in 1992. How many states did he win more than 50 percent of the vote in?”

Trump could be correct about the number of illegal votes, but there is no way to know,said Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with The Heritage Foundation who focuses on voter integrity issues."
Impact of Noncitizen Voters on the 2016 Election



And this thread:

Say Again...Who Won The Popular Vote??

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Of course Trump won the popular vote.

The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.

You're a fool....but even you must know that.


Don't you?

It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.

Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate

Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.

Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.

 

[BluesLegend]

[

Very Likely, had HIllary won, the same could have been said about her.

Defending Trump by pointing out how much like Hillary he is.

Classic modern conservative madness!!

how silly you are.

the comment was about Hillarys low likeability numbers.
Not a comparison to Trump.

Some of us pointed out early on that Hillary is no Bill Clinton when it comes to political talent, she's not even in his league.

Some of us pointed out before you were on this board that running Hillary Clinton was a dumb idea.

So what happened? They kicked her to the curb in 2008 so why did they run this loser in 2016?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why wait???

Got it right now....

1. “If there is a recount in Michigan and Trump loses by a few votes, then it’s very plausible that noncitizen voting made a big difference. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that.”

Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama.

Richman applied those numbers to 2016:

The basic assumptions on which the extrapolation is based are that 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted, and that of the noncitizens who voted, 81.8 percent voted for Clinton and 17.5 percent voted for Trump. … 6.4 percent turnout among the roughly 20.3 million noncitizen adults in the U.S. would add only 834,318 votes to Clinton’s popular vote margin. This is little more than a third of the total margin. … Is it plausible that noncitizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes. Is it plausible that noncitizen votes account for the entire nationwide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.


“An issue of concern is that so many have voted that are not legally supposed to,” Miller told reporters in a conference call Monday.



Beyond the noncitizens voting study from Old Dominion, Miller pointed to the Pew study from 2012 that found 24 million voter registration records in the United States, or about 1 in 8, were “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.”

The Pew study further found “1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters,” that “12 million records contain an incorrect address,” and that “2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.”


“If 10 percent of noncitizens voted, it would likely make a popular vote difference,” Camarota told The Daily Signal. “It’s not the Electoral College [Trump] is upset about. It’s the popular vote. I wish he wouldn’t focus on it. Bill Clinton got just 43 percent of the vote in 1992. How many states did he win more than 50 percent of the vote in?”

Trump could be correct about the number of illegal votes, but there is no way to know,said Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with The Heritage Foundation who focuses on voter integrity issues."
Impact of Noncitizen Voters on the 2016 Election



And this thread:

Say Again...Who Won The Popular Vote??

Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................

Get a grip already

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Of course Trump won the popular vote.

The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.

You're a fool....but even you must know that.


Don't you?

It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.

Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate

Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.

Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.

What????

You need another slap up side the head???

No prob!


"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From Californiahttp://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/


Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????

You betcha'!!!!


California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015
Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/


Tissue?

 

[Coyote]

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Nope, they elected one instead.

Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.

Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.

Did any illegal aliens vote?

How many?

That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.

Glad you asked!


"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf


That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....


...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.

Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.


Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time

....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)

and...

b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....


....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????


You betcha'!!!!!!!


Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.

Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’

Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.

...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.​

Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.

Check.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Speaking of one's "grip"....

...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?


Why?

The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.

Never realized the right would lie so blatently.

Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.

Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.

Nope, they elected one instead.

Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.

Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.

Did any illegal aliens vote?

How many?

That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.

Glad you asked!


"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf


That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....


...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.

Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.


Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time

....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)

and...

b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....


....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????


You betcha'!!!!!!!


Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.

So you quote a document from 2014 blog...And speculate. Math is just too hard for you. Copying and pasting is not.

 

[Coyote]

ILMAO at popular vote, (i.e., "winning the popular vote is important"). Seriously dumb fucks, pull your heads out of the collective liberal bunghole. You're stupid, and that's in context.

Winning the popular vote is not as important as winning the EC. It's the EC that determines the prize. It is rare however (like maybe only 4 times) that a candidate fails to win both. At most - it put's into question the quality of the victory and weakens any mandate but it in no way changes the outcome.

If it's not "important" to you guys why are you spending so much energy and creative expertise trying to show that Hillary didn't really win the popular vote?