Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never realized the right would lie so blatently.
Trump didn't win the popular vote.
Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.
Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.
Nope, they elected one instead.
Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’
Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.
Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.
Check.
She won the popular vote dude, you can pretend that's nothing, but it's not. It may not be the Big Prize, but it is still important. Now, the question is - why is it so important to you to diminish that?
What's important about winning two or three states Trump never campaigned in? If Trump had needed the most votes, he'd have gone to California and Illinois, and upstate New York. And I seriously doubt she won the popular vote given the amount of ballot-manipulation we saw in Michigan.
Nope, they elected one instead.
Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’
Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.
Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.
Check.
Did you have to PROVE how stupid you are?????
Politico.....????
The source that sent its articles to Podesta for his OK??????
"#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story"
#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story
Never realized the right would lie so blatently.
Trump didn't win the popular vote.
Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.
Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.
Nope, they elected one instead.
Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
So you quote a document from 2014 blog...And speculate. Math is just too hard for you. Copying and pasting is not.
My God, you seriously don't have a clue, do you?I seriously doubt he would have made a dent in those states - if he thought he could, he would have campaigned there.
What ballot manipulation? Be specific.
[
Very Likely, had HIllary won, the same could have been said about her.
Defending Trump by pointing out how much like Hillary he is.
Classic modern conservative madness!!
how silly you are.
the comment was about Hillarys low likeability numbers.
Not a comparison to Trump.
Nope, they elected one instead.
Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
So you quote a document from 2014 blog...And speculate. Math is just too hard for you. Copying and pasting is not.
I quoted a study that indicates millions of illegals vote.
And you never disputed that the snake, Obama, told them to do so.
Yup....Trump won the popular vote.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’
Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.
Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.
Check.
Did you have to PROVE how stupid you are?????
Politico.....????
The source that sent its articles to Podesta for his OK??????
"#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story"
#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story
Diversionary tactic: poison the well, deflect to something else.
You can't challenge the evidence?
[
Very Likely, had HIllary won, the same could have been said about her.
Defending Trump by pointing out how much like Hillary he is.
Classic modern conservative madness!!
how silly you are.
the comment was about Hillarys low likeability numbers.
Not a comparison to Trump.
It was a direct comparison.
I seriously doubt he would have made a dent in those states - if he thought he could, he would have campaigned there.
What ballot manipulation? Be specific.
Dude a penny in the garbage has more value than the popular vote does in the USA.............................
Get a grip already
Speaking of one's "grip"....
...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?
Why?
The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.
Never realized the right would lie so blatently.
Trump didn't win the popular vote.
Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.
Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.
Of course Trump won the popular vote.
The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.
You're a fool....but even you must know that.
Don't you?
It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.
Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate
Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.
Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.
What????
You need another slap up side the head???
No prob!
"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From Californiahttp://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/
Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????
You betcha'!!!!
California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015
Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/
Tissue?
Nope, they elected one instead.
Sorry, PC, but you're going to have to go and do your copy and paste thing with that vote count. And a link to the source. Right now. We'll wait right here for you, sugar.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’
Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.
Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.
Check.
Did you have to PROVE how stupid you are?????
Politico.....????
The source that sent its articles to Podesta for his OK??????
"#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story"
#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story
I seriously doubt he would have made a dent in those states - if he thought he could, he would have campaigned there.
What ballot manipulation? Be specific.
I already have in numerous other threads you were in. Once again, in several Detroit precincts there were several more votes than voters. Closer examination, bringing about the abrupt end of the recount, showed several Hillary votes had been run through the scanners multiple times. It's the easiest way to rig an outcome and the Rat party has been doing that, and worse, for decades.
Speaking of one's "grip"....
...why would you wish to allow the lying Left to cling to the hope that they won the popular vote.....or any accolade at all?
Why?
The lost both the electoral college and the popular vote.
Never realized the right would lie so blatently.
Trump didn't win the popular vote.
Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.
Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.
Of course Trump won the popular vote.
The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.
You're a fool....but even you must know that.
Don't you?
It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.
Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate
Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.
Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.
What????
You need another slap up side the head???
No prob!
"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From Californiahttp://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/
Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????
You betcha'!!!!
California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015
Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/
Tissue?
Texas has comparable proportions of illegal immigrants to its overall population, and the state went to Trump. Sorry, PoliticalTwit, but you should try real math instead of conjecture.
Now....watch me destroy you with two short questions.
Did any illegal aliens vote?
How many?
That's the question you need to answer giving the claims you made.
Glad you asked!
"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf
That rounds out to about 1 and a third million votes....
...and that was at a time when the issue was simply Barack Obama.
Now...when their future in America was at stake...and Obama telling then that there was no penalty for breaking the law.....heck, at least twice as many voted.
Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time
....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)
and...
b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....
....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????
You betcha'!!!!!!!
Trump won both the EC and the popular vote.
Trump’s Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.’
Donald Trump is making news with his false claim that he would have won the national popular vote if millions of non-citizens had not voted in November. As evidence, he and his staff are pointing to a study by Jesse Richman and his co-authors that was published in the journal Electoral Studies and advertised on the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog. As a member of the team that produces the datasets upon which that study was based and as the co-author of an article published in the same journal that provides a clear “take down” of the study in question, I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
...Indeed, it took me and my colleagues only a few hours to figure out why the authors’ findings were wrong and to produce the evidence needed to prove as much. The authors were essentially basing their claims on two pieces of data associated with the large survey—a question that asks people whether they are citizens and official vote records to which each respondent has been matched to determine whether he or she had voted. Both these pieces of information include some small amounts of measurement error, as is true of all survey questions. What the authors failed to consider is that measurement error was entirely responsible for their results. In fact, once my colleagues and I accounted for that error, we found that there were essentially zero non-citizens who voted in recent elections.
Now, review what "proof" actually is. It's not the Richman study.
Check.
Did you have to PROVE how stupid you are?????
Politico.....????
The source that sent its articles to Podesta for his OK??????
"#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story"
#PodestaEmails: Politico journalist seeks OK from Clinton before running story
A few more articles to lay to rest your extremely weak thesis:
AP fact check: How do Trump's voter fraud allegations hold up?
Trump’s charge that he actually won the popular vote if the “millions of people who voted illegally” had not been counted mimics one posted on Infowars.com, a conservative website that traffics in conspiracy theories.
Trump's Bogus Voter Fraud Claims - FactCheck.org
In Wisconsin, Trump cited a 2014 Washington Post article titled “Could non-citizens decide the November election?” It was a piece penned by Old Dominion University professors Jesse Richman and David Earnest about research the two later published in the journal Electoral Studies. It turns out to be a disputed and very controversial study.
Trump accurately quotes from the blog post. But the authors’ results are contested by a number of academics, including those who administer and manage the data on which it is based.
Fact check: Trump sticks with bogus voter fraud claims
“Their finding is entirely due to measurement error,” one of the authors, Stephen Ansolabehere of Harvard and the principal investigator of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, told us. “Measurement errors happen. People accidentally check the wrong box in surveys. The rate of such errors in the CCES is very small, but such errors do happen. And when they do happen on a question such as citizenship, researchers can easily draw the wrong inference about voting behaviors. Richman and Earnest extrapolate from a handful of wrongfully classified cases (of non-citizens).”
Study cited as proof of vote fraud by Trump team misinterpreted, author says
Even if we assume the Richman and Earnest study is correct, Richman told us that it does not back Trump’s claim that noncitizen voting swung the popular vote in favor of Clinton.
Never realized the right would lie so blatently.
Trump didn't win the popular vote.
Clinton didn't win the electoral vote.
Time to let go of your infantile fantasies.
Of course Trump won the popular vote.
The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.
You're a fool....but even you must know that.
Don't you?
It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.
Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate
Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.
Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.
What????
You need another slap up side the head???
No prob!
"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From Californiahttp://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/
Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????
You betcha'!!!!
California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015
Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/
Tissue?
Texas has comparable proportions of illegal immigrants to its overall population, and the state went to Trump. Sorry, PoliticalTwit, but you should try real math instead of conjecture.
A million fewer, you dope.
I seriously doubt he would have made a dent in those states - if he thought he could, he would have campaigned there.
What ballot manipulation? Be specific.
I already have in numerous other threads you were in. Once again, in several Detroit precincts there were several more votes than voters. Closer examination, bringing about the abrupt end of the recount, showed several Hillary votes had been run through the scanners multiple times. It's the easiest way to rig an outcome and the Rat party has been doing that, and worse, for decades.
Pretty much everyone agrees you can't rig a national election in favor of any one candidate due to the non-centralized nature of our system.
maybe you people should try running one next timeIt is good to see more Trumpbots admitting that Trump could never have won against a good Democratic candidate.
INSTEAD OF the most crony insider on the planet!!!
..
Of course Trump won the popular vote.
The only way to pretend otherwise is to count the illegal alien votes that Obama told them to cast.
You're a fool....but even you must know that.
Don't you?
It's up to the person who made the claim (that illegals voted in high numbers) to prove that 389,944 illegals voted and cost Trump the popular vote.
Let me remind you of what proof is not:
it's not hearsay
it's not implications and extrapolations
it's not allegations
it's not the rightwing wetdream to justify popularity or a mandate
Let me remind you of what proof is:
it's evidence of large numbers of illegals voting in Hillary's favor
It's hard evidence, facts and proof of criminal acts in voter fraud.
Otherwise, your claims are nothing more than a baby crying because he won the trophy prettiest baby but not the popularity contest.
What????
You need another slap up side the head???
No prob!
"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From Californiahttp://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/
Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????
You betcha'!!!!
California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015
Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/
Tissue?
Texas has comparable proportions of illegal immigrants to its overall population, and the state went to Trump. Sorry, PoliticalTwit, but you should try real math instead of conjecture.
A million fewer, you dope.
Not that it makes a bit of difference...there's no evidence they voted. Let's stick to facts.
