Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?

[J.E.D]

Nope. Not seeing it. Try again, wingnuts.

 

[Crackerjack]

Terrorists, crooks and illegals selling drugs can buy the 30 legally but really, they need even bigger clips. Get busy making a 90 round mag before sanity prevails and we get rid of this shit.

Go play in traffic, asshole.

Truth hurts, huh.

Why don't rw gun nuts want to stop illegal aliens, terrorists and crooks from being able to buy any combination of weapons they want? Why do rw gun nuts want to arm the bad guys?

Thanks to you, they won't have to make do with box cutters next time.

Why don't rabid, partisan dickholes such as yourself shut the fuck up and stop polluting the public discourse with the stinking turds they call opinions?

Fuck you and fuck your "opinion," shitstain.

 

[Crackerjack]

I'm still trying to find where rights are subject to a showing of need in my copy of the Constitution. Maybe someone could direct me to it?

I'm still trying to find where you have the right to a 30 round mag in the Constitution. Maybe you could direct me to it?

Ninth Amendment. You're welcome.

 

[Ernie S.]

Or maybe well regulating how much ammo the mag holds will have not have a hindering effect on the militia's effectiveness. How many shots are needed to protect ones self? Seems gobs of ammo in no longer about self-protection and all about shooting up all kinds of shit, or maybe kids, as was recently the case.

You might have a point if well regulated meant what it means now back when the second amendment was being written

Well Regulated

The Random House College Dictionary (1980) gives four definitions for the word "regulate," which were all in use during the Colonial period and one more definition dating from 1690 (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 1989). They are:

1) To control or direct by a rule, principle, method, etc.
2) To adjust to some standard or requirement as for amount, degree, etc.

3) To adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation.

4) To put in good order.

[obsolete sense]
b. Of troops: Properly disciplined. Obs. rare-1.

1690 Lond. Gaz. No. 2568/3 We hear likewise that the French are in a great Allarm in Dauphine and Bresse, not having at present 1500 Men of regulated Troops on that side.

The militia was free from federal government control up until the Federal government needed help from the militia. And the militia member was supposed to supply his own firearm.

Cool. You a militia member. Right? When will you be called up? Hell when was the last time you or any militia member you know was called up. And you know, the military is gonna laugh at those puny ass wannabe assault weapon you show up with.

You do know the military supplies the weapons (REAL assault weapons) these days for the soldiers called up.
But then again.....

Let's look at the 2nd Amendment. It contains 2 simple phrases.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State;

The first phrase is nothing more than an acknowledgement that a well armed, trained and disciplined Militia is necessary if and when the security of a free state is threatened.

The second phrase is even simpler; written so that the common man of the 1780's could understand without 9 elderly lawyers.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Really people! What part of "shall not be infringed" is so difficult to grasp?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Or maybe well regulating how much ammo the mag holds will have not have a hindering effect on the militia's effectiveness. How many shots are needed to protect ones self? Seems gobs of ammo in no longer about self-protection and all about shooting up all kinds of shit, or maybe kids, as was recently the case.

You might have a point if well regulated meant what it means now back when the second amendment was being written

Well Regulated

The Random House College Dictionary (1980) gives four definitions for the word "regulate," which were all in use during the Colonial period and one more definition dating from 1690 (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 1989). They are:

1) To control or direct by a rule, principle, method, etc.
2) To adjust to some standard or requirement as for amount, degree, etc.

3) To adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation.

4) To put in good order.

[obsolete sense]
b. Of troops: Properly disciplined. Obs. rare-1.

1690 Lond. Gaz. No. 2568/3 We hear likewise that the French are in a great Allarm in Dauphine and Bresse, not having at present 1500 Men of regulated Troops on that side.

The militia was free from federal government control up until the Federal government needed help from the militia. And the militia member was supposed to supply his own firearm.

Cool. You a militia member. Right? When will you be called up? Hell when was the last time you or any militia member you know was called up. And you know, the military is gonna laugh at those puny ass wannabe assault weapon you show up with.

You do know the military supplies the weapons (REAL assault weapons) these days for the soldiers called up.
But then again.....

I suggest that you look up Miller vs. U.S. 1938 before you say anything further

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. Not seeing it. Try again, wingnuts.

It doesn't matter if you can't see it , because you can't see it doesn't change one thing.

 

[Ernie S.]

I'm still trying to find where rights are subject to a showing of need in my copy of the Constitution. Maybe someone could direct me to it?

I'm still trying to find where you have the right to a 30 round mag in the Constitution. Maybe you could direct me to it?

What part of "Shall not be infringed" is so fucking hard for you to grasp?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

 

[saveliberty]

30-round magazines make nice coffee table pieces too.

 

[theHawk]

No one needs a 30 round magazine.

I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.

No one needs more than one pair of shoes.

Yea, time for shoe control laws. This madness must stop.

 

[Ernie S.]

30-round magazines make nice coffee table pieces too.

They're handy to keep your stack of paper targets from blowing away too.

 

[saveliberty]

30-round magazines make nice coffee table pieces too.

They're handy to keep your stack of paper targets from blowing away too.

Not to mention organizing up to 30 rounds...

 

[Inthemiddle]

The constitution says nothing about a right to have fertilizer. We should have banned that a long time ago, to prevent the OKC bombing.

 

[DiamondDave]

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

I already told this to the buffoon earlier in the thread.. he ignored it then, he'll ignore it now

 

[Sallow]

Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.

Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:

(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)

(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)


Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Because you can't shoot 24 six years in the face..with a clip that just holds six rounds.

 

[DiamondDave]

You might have a point if well regulated meant what it means now back when the second amendment was being written


The militia was free from federal government control up until the Federal government needed help from the militia. And the militia member was supposed to supply his own firearm.

Cool. You a militia member. Right? When will you be called up? Hell when was the last time you or any militia member you know was called up. And you know, the military is gonna laugh at those puny ass wannabe assault weapon you show up with.

You do know the military supplies the weapons (REAL assault weapons) these days for the soldiers called up.
But then again.....

Let's look at the 2nd Amendment. It contains 2 simple phrases.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State;

The first phrase is nothing more than an acknowledgement that a well armed, trained and disciplined Militia is necessary if and when the security of a free state is threatened.

The second phrase is even simpler; written so that the common man of the 1780's could understand without 9 elderly lawyers.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Really people! What part of "shall not be infringed" is so difficult to grasp?

Precisely... and I have told these buffoons this numerous times as well

/end thread

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.

Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:

(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)

(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)


Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Because you can't shoot 24 six years in the face..with a clip that just holds six rounds.

knee jerk reaction is just that a knee jerk reaction. Those who use logic understand this.

 

[Sallow]

You might have a point if well regulated meant what it means now back when the second amendment was being written


The militia was free from federal government control up until the Federal government needed help from the militia. And the militia member was supposed to supply his own firearm.

Cool. You a militia member. Right? When will you be called up? Hell when was the last time you or any militia member you know was called up. And you know, the military is gonna laugh at those puny ass wannabe assault weapon you show up with.

You do know the military supplies the weapons (REAL assault weapons) these days for the soldiers called up.
But then again.....

Let's look at the 2nd Amendment. It contains 2 simple phrases.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State;

The first phrase is nothing more than an acknowledgement that a well armed, trained and disciplined Militia is necessary if and when the security of a free state is threatened.

The second phrase is even simpler; written so that the common man of the 1780's could understand without 9 elderly lawyers.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Really people! What part of "shall not be infringed" is so difficult to grasp?

The part that says that the militia is under congressional control.

Or is that so hard to comprehend.

Get rid of the professional army.

Then the second amendment makes sense.

Right now?

It doesn't.

And none of you folks are in favor of that.

 

[DiamondDave]

Cool. You a militia member. Right? When will you be called up? Hell when was the last time you or any militia member you know was called up. And you know, the military is gonna laugh at those puny ass wannabe assault weapon you show up with.

You do know the military supplies the weapons (REAL assault weapons) these days for the soldiers called up.
But then again.....

Let's look at the 2nd Amendment. It contains 2 simple phrases.



The first phrase is nothing more than an acknowledgement that a well armed, trained and disciplined Militia is necessary if and when the security of a free state is threatened.

The second phrase is even simpler; written so that the common man of the 1780's could understand without 9 elderly lawyers.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Really people! What part of "shall not be infringed" is so difficult to grasp?

The part that says that the militia is under congressional control.

Or is that so hard to comprehend.

Get rid of the professional army.

Then the second amendment makes sense.

Right now?

It doesn't.

And none of you folks are in favor of that.

It does not say a militia under congressional control

You sir, are even more of an idiot than previously thought

 

[skookerasbil]

Who needs a 30 round magazine............this is a far superior zombie killer imo...............

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2BvJzqeLp0]Shooting The Mossberg 930 SPX 12ga Shotgun - YouTube[/ame]


AR-15's fire this little cheesy round of ammo. A weapon like the 930 Mossberg can take a head clear off at 25 paces with one single shot of 00 buck.