Why does Obama

[billyerock1991]

When Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery...you know the depth of libtard stupidity.

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

 

[jknowgood]

Actually, no. But you a brainwashed functional ignoramus. Change the channel.

Coming from someone who believes Obama when he tells him he is doing better, but just doesn't feel it yet . Lol you have no right to call anyone an idiot.

 

[jknowgood]

When Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery...you know the depth of libtard stupidity.

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

 

[Avorysuds]

crickets ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

unemployment was 9.9% in 2009, currently it's 5.9%

true or false ?

lol, False... Less people are working today than in 2009, by %. 200k jobs is nice, but when you lose 300k people that same month, it sucks.

 

[Ernie S.]

@franco ROFLMAO

 

[billyerock1991]

When Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery...you know the depth of libtard stupidity.

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

 

[billyerock1991]

crickets ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

unemployment was 9.9% in 2009, currently it's 5.9%

true or false ?

lol, False... Less people are working today than in 2009, by %. 200k jobs is nice, but when you lose 300k people that same month, it sucks.

its obvious you don't know how unemployment numbers work .... if you had 200K hired and 300k lost their job then the percentage would go up not down you idiot... you repub-lie-cans say the stupidest shit

 

[jknowgood]

When Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery...you know the depth of libtard stupidity.

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

 

[Freewill]

crickets ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

unemployment was 9.9% in 2009, currently it's 5.9%

true or false ?

Most new jobs created during the Obama has gone to illegals.

Two-thirds of jobs go to immigrants during Obama’s four years
Two-thirds of jobs go to immigrants during Obama s four years - Washington Times


CIS: Most New Jobs Going to Immigrants
CIS Most New Jobs Going to Immigrants

"Sparks" need jobs too.

 

[Freewill]

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

A full 4 percent drop work force participation rate since the Obama take over with no end in sight. 4 plus 5.9 = 9.9, quite sad.

 

[billyerock1991]

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power they caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is, keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

 

[Freewill]

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power the caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

In 2008, who controlled both branches of Congress? You know Congress that is in charge of regulation?

 

[billyerock1991]

you have a sourse of this bull shit lie of yours??? didn't think so

ECONOMY, POLITICS, SOCIALISM, STUPID LIBERALS
Pelosi: Food Stamps and Unemployment Give ‘Biggest Bang for Our Buck’
by Lonely Conservative • October 7, 2010 • 16 Comments
Nancy Pelosi proudly defended the welfare party.

CNN: At a press conference in her home town of San Francisco, Pelosi explained that the program’s multiplier effect –the amount of money generated in the local economy as the result of the subsidy– far exceeds the nearly $60 billion spent this year by the federal government and is a sure-fire way to stimulate the economy. For every dollar a person receives in food stamps, Pelosi said that $1.79 is put back into the economy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cites an even higher figure of $1.84.

“It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck,” she said.
Gingrich on Tuesday wrote a letter critical of the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy and urged all Republican candidates to shape the political debate as one “between the Democratic Party of food stamps and the Republican Party of paychecks.”


GFY...

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

so what you're Saying, when the CBO stated to the country,About welfare numbers, that year, that they made a 1.79 on every dollar they spent on welfare ... so what you're trying to tell us here, is the CBO is full of BULL shit ... that they haven't any Idea in what they are saying??? is that what you're trying to say here??? that way we can all see what a Idiot you really are ????

 

[billyerock1991]

as I said she was reporting what the CBO said ...the $1.79 return on on every dollar spent on welfare isa good thing ... what she was trying to tell you moronic repub-lie-cans is we as tax payers were making .79 cents on every dollar spent on welfare... I would say that's a good thing or as pelosi said you're getting more bang for the buck....the fact that you repubp-lie cans have your lips wrapped around repub-lie-cans bung holes isn't my problem ... ang yes, right back at you GFY

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power the caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

In 2008, who controlled both branches of Congress? You know Congress that is in charge of regulation?

it wasn't the democrats that controlled both branches, if thats what you're trying to imply here ... the democrats held the majority but never had the super majority ... to control both branches you would have to had the super majority and the democrats didn't hold the super majority in both branches ... I mean they could pass bill in the house but when it got to the senate, all it took was one republican to filibuster that bill .... thats what the republicans did ... thats why hardly any thing got passed ... NEXT question

 

[Ernie S.]

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power the caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

In 2008, who controlled both branches of Congress? You know Congress that is in charge of regulation?

it wasn't the democrats that controlled both branches, if thats what you're trying to imply here ... the democrats held the majority but never had the super majority ... to control both branches you would have to had the super majority and the democrats didn't hold the super majority in both branches ... I mean they could pass bill in the house but when it got to the senate, all it took was one republican to filibuster that bill .... thats what the republicans did ... thats why hardly any thing got passed ... NEXT question

So the Republicans were "obstructionists" right?

What do you call Harry Reid refusing to bring House bills to the Senate floor?

 

[Freewill]

Okay, I will play your silly game. How much of that dollar actually goes to the welfare recipient? When you find out, and figure out how much we are getting screwed. You can explain how we the tax payer get .79¢ back on every dollar that goes to welfare. Then let me know how I can directly invest in this little jewel. I will never have to work another day in my life. Oh, and l got land on Pluto for sell. Cheap!

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power the caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

In 2008, who controlled both branches of Congress? You know Congress that is in charge of regulation?

it wasn't the democrats that controlled both branches, if thats what you're trying to imply here ... the democrats held the majority but never had the super majority ... to control both branches you would have to had the super majority and the democrats didn't hold the super majority in both branches ... I mean they could pass bill in the house but when it got to the senate, all it took was one republican to filibuster that bill .... thats what the republicans did ... thats why hardly any thing got passed ... NEXT question

Were you alive then? Pelosi controlled the House and Reid the Senate. In 2009 they did have a filibuster majority in the Senate for about a year that is why whey crapped their pants when kennedy died and Scott won. And of course in 2009 the country started it skid when they controlled both Congress and POTUS.

If you were alive then you don't remember history very well.

 

[jknowgood]

its not a silly game ... its you not knowing what's going on ... the 1.79 Nancy pelosi spoke about is the amount that is generate from products that they buy that comes back to the tax coffer at 1.79 for ever dollar they spend ... they were saying they are making .79 cents.... this was pointed out By pelosi when she spoke to the press about it ... she got her infiormation from the CBO ...the poster who I was disagreeing with said, "Nancy says that welfare is the engine of recovery"
I pointed out she never made that statement .... I pointed out what she had said .... then you come in with some right wing nonsense that has nothing to do with what was being Discussed here ... I pointed out to you what the CBO said .... if you don't like what the CBO said take it up with them ... I'm not the one who is the expert in figuring out cost ... they are .... Also ... if you look at what Welfare cost us in the national budget.. it says it cost .008% of the budget goes to welfare, you miight say to yourself, then why are the repub-lie-cans all over this ??? well, I'll tell ya... its like everything repub-lie-can, they have to demonize everything to justify their means .... they will take one person on welfare the show how that one person abused the system ... then say see how bad welfare is ... they do that to everything .... your too stupid to see it ..... you're too lazy to look it up

Go ahead and believe that bullshit. When has government ever run anything efficiently?

government has run efficiently when repub-lie-cans couldn't remove regulations .... once the repub-lie-cans got into power the caused government programs to fail by deregulating them... so the answer to your question is keep repub-lie-cans out of power and the country will run just fine

In 2008, who controlled both branches of Congress? You know Congress that is in charge of regulation?

it wasn't the democrats that controlled both branches, if thats what you're trying to imply here ... the democrats held the majority but never had the super majority ... to control both branches you would have to had the super majority and the democrats didn't hold the super majority in both branches ... I mean they could pass bill in the house but when it got to the senate, all it took was one republican to filibuster that bill .... thats what the republicans did ... thats why hardly any thing got passed ... NEXT question

Were you alive then? Pelosi controlled the House and Reid the Senate. In 2009 they did have a filibuster majority in the Senate for about a year that is why whey crapped their pants when kennedy died and Scott won. And of course in 2009 the country started it skid when they controlled both Congress and POTUS.

If you were alive then you don't remember history very well.

I think he gets his talking points from nutty luddley.