Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
Horse patoot. But I'm sure that's changed under ACA. What with pre-existing covered and no more cutoffs.September 24, 2014, 7:56 AM
Many Americans still lack health insurance
Although the rolls of the uninsured have dropped dramatically since the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, took effect in January, a nagging 15 percent of the population remains uninsured, according to a new survey sponsored by the
Transamerica Center for Health Studies
. Still, the percentage of Americans without health coverage has dropped markedly from 22 percent to 15 percent over the past 11 months, according to the poll of 2,624 adults under the age of 64.
It's worth noting that the U.S. Census Bureau normally does a good analysis of changes in insurance coverage from year-to-year, but the government recently changed its survey methodology, which made year-to-year comparisons impossible. The government data, which was released in August, found that 86.6 percent of the population had health insurance during 2013 and just 13.4 percent had no coverage.
However, the government uses a narrow definition of what constitutes an insured person. If you had insurance at any time during the year, the Census Bureau now considers you insured. Someone who was covered for a month or two, but lost a job and is no longer covered, would still appear insured via the Census formula. The government's methodology only considers people to be uninsured if they had no coverage at any point during the year.
Many Americans still lack health insurance
This method of changing statistics to your favor is also known as COOKING THE BOOKS!
Let me guess, The GOP's plan: LET THEM DIE, QUICKLY?
NO REASON THE US DOESN'T HAVE UHC L;IKE EVERY OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS!
You CAN'T find ONE poll EVER that ANY UHC nation wants US style H/C. Weird right? lol
Yes, that is very weird. But since I'm a patient at the world renown Cleveland Clinic, and also have a sister that works there, I can testify that all the world VIP's come to the US to get quality healthcare they can't find in Socialist medical care countries.
In fact, Canada spends over 1 billion dollars a year to have their citizens treated in the US that they can't care for. Sure, socialist healthcare is great for a cold, a broken arm, something in your eye. But they lag behind the US in treating serous illnesses in a timely way.
So if you found out you had cancer, would you rather be treated here, or in Cuba or Russia?
THE RICH COME TO THE US? And?
Feb 23, 2015 - "Medical tourism" refers to traveling to another country for medical care. It's estimated that up to 750,000 US residents travel abroad for care
CDC Features - Medical Tourism
It's not because they can't get it here, it's because they didn't take the initiative to have insurance. Furthermore is the fact that our bureaucracies stopped the sales of drugs that are used in other countries, also known as red tape.
And as your article points out, many of those going to other countries are immigrants that can't get treated here for whatever reason. So they go back home to get treated since they are still considered citizens.
Obviously Commie Care didn't help those people going back to their country to get treatment.