Why "gay's blood" doesn't help?

Menerva Lindsen

Active Member
Dec 18, 2014
231
23
33
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg
 
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg
Vision and Mission Statements
Vision Statement:
Family Research Council's vision is a culture in which human life is valued, families flourish and religious liberty thrives.
Mission of Organization:
Family Research Council's mission is to advance faith, family and freedom in public policy and the culture from a Christian worldview.
About Us Menu ------------------------- About FRC Mission Statement History FRC Staff FAQs Directions Employment Job Listings Volunteer Internships Employment Inquiries How Your Gifts Help Contact Us


just a whole lot bias and not at ALL Christian.
 
Why do disease ridden faggots want to donate blood to normal people? ...... :dunno:
look what's talking about disease. your views on that are just as medieval as they are on women and just about any subject I could name.
you yammer on about homo sexuality more than gay people do..
 
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg

Did you miss that part where they can't have had sex in a year?
 
There is a time lapse between when a homo is infected with HIV and when a blood test shows his blood carries the disease.

Depending on a faggot to truthfully answer a question about the last time he had his fudge packed.

This puts anyone receiving a blood transfusion at risk of being infected with this deadly disease.

All in the name of political correctness. ..... :cool:
 
Last edited:
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg
FYI, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all of the nation's blood supply to be tested for Hepatitis B surface antigen, Hepatitis B core antibody, HIV-1 and 2 antibodies, HIV p24 antigen, Hepatitis C, Syphilis, HTLV-1 and 2 (Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus), and ALT (Alanine aminotransferase, which is a liver marker).

Previously, homosexual men were banded from giving blood. The band has changed to sex within the last 12 months. This change will put the US on par with European countries who have been doing this for 3 year. The blood supply will be just as safe now as it was in the past.
 
Last edited:
Look at the bright side. Now Sunni Man will be able to say those unnatural urges he feels must be due to a blood transfusion he got from a gay man, therefore it's not his fault.
 
There is a time lapse between when a homo is infected with HIV and when a blood test shows his blood carries the disease.

Depending on a faggot to truthfully answer a question about the last time he had his fudge packed.

This puts anyone receiving a blood transfusion at risk of being infected with this deadly disease.

All in the name of political correctness. ..... :cool:
bullshit! the test make that all moot.
if hiv is present no blood is taken.
you just said that because you think the euphemism fudge packed is clever ..
 
bullshit! the test make that all moot.
if hiv is present no blood is taken.
Like I said before, there is a lag time between when a fudge packer is infected, and when a blood test will indicate his blood is infected with HIV.

Which is why allowing homos to donate blood should still be against the law. ..... :cool:
 
Last edited:
Well...if World Net Daily and The Family Research Council says so then it must be true. WND once claimed soy sauce causes homosexuality. lol.
 
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg

Did you miss that part where they can't have had sex in a year?
Yes, i did. I've provided you with the link. Are you more concerned about the missed passage or the whole problem? Gay couple can't help people with their blood and you speak about a year-ban for sex. Just a nonsense!!
 
A decision by the Food and Drug Administration to move forward with a plan to allow “men who have sex with men” to donate blood under certain conditions amounts to caving to a social and political agenda, according to the Family Research Council.
“Research presented to the committee confirmed the dramatically elevated risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) — a risk 62 times higher than in the general public,” said Peter Sprigg, FRC senior fellow for policy studies, on Tuesday.
Blood-donor rules bent by 8216 politics 8217
gay-juice.jpg

Did you miss that part where they can't have had sex in a year?
Yes, i did. I've provided you with the link. Are you more concerned about the missed passage or the whole problem? Gay couple can't help people with their blood and you speak about a year-ban for sex. Just a nonsense!!

The vast majority of them are not going to be able donate blood because of that.

But, I got your number. We're done.
 
Like we're supposed to go by the honor system regarding how recently a homo packed fudge? All this does is slow down the screening process while making it cost more all in the name of appeasing the extortion of the homofascist agenda.
 
There is a time lapse between when a homo is infected with HIV and when a blood test shows his blood carries the disease.

Depending on a faggot to truthfully answer a question about the last time he had his fudge packed.

This puts anyone receiving a blood transfusion at risk of being infected with this deadly disease.

All in the name of political correctness. ..... :cool:
Currently, the tests will detect HIV after 9 days. The new ban is 12 months after sex. It's not just political correctness. When the ban was originated in the 1980's, there was little data available on the accuracy of the blood test. Since then the test has been improve considerably and we have a lot of data to go by.
 
There is a time lapse between when a homo is infected with HIV and when a blood test shows his blood carries the disease.

Depending on a faggot to truthfully answer a question about the last time he had his fudge packed.

This puts anyone receiving a blood transfusion at risk of being infected with this deadly disease.

All in the name of political correctness. ..... :cool:
Currently, the tests will detect HIV after 9 days. The new ban is 12 months after sex. It's not just political correctness. When the ban was originated in the 1980's, there was little data available on the accuracy of the blood test. Since then the test has been improve considerably and we have a lot of data to go by.
But the new homo pressure results in more testing which will result in more rejections which could be avoided by disallowing the marginal number of homo males donating in the first place. This is a waste of money brought about by homofascist pressure.
 
Like we're supposed to go by the honor system regarding how recently a homo packed fudge? All this does is slow down the screening process while making it cost more all in the name of appeasing the extortion of the homofascist agenda.
The only thing you can rely on is the testing of blood. Screening by questionnaire is unreliable because you don't know if the information is accurate. The donor may have lied or the donor may be a heterosexual who has had sex with an infected person, either homosexual or heterosexual.
 
Like we're supposed to go by the honor system regarding how recently a homo packed fudge? All this does is slow down the screening process while making it cost more all in the name of appeasing the extortion of the homofascist agenda.
The only thing you can rely on is the testing of blood. Screening by questionnaire is unreliable because you don't know if the information is accurate. The donor may have lied or the donor may be a heterosexual who has had sex with an infected person, either homosexual or heterosexual.
That's my point. If they admit they're homo male you disallow any donations and you don't have to test those results because there won't be any to test. It simplifies the process and is less expensive.
 
Like we're supposed to go by the honor system regarding how recently a homo packed fudge? All this does is slow down the screening process while making it cost more all in the name of appeasing the extortion of the homofascist agenda.
The only thing you can rely on is the testing of blood. Screening by questionnaire is unreliable because you don't know if the information is accurate. The donor may have lied or the donor may be a heterosexual who has had sex with an infected person, either homosexual or heterosexual.
That's my point. If they admit they're homo male you disallow any donations and you don't have to test those results because there won't be any to test. It simplifies the process and is less expensive.
Someone on the streets selling their blood for $25 is going to admit there're homosexual and be rejected? Not gonna happen. The purpose of screening is to eliminate donations that would be rejected when the blood is tested. It simply reduces costs. The safeguard is the blood testing, not the screenings.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top