Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they don't like the politics of gun owners and push gun bans to punish us
Oh, no doubt. If it were for you stupid ass Bubba Rednecks clinging to your guns and your bibles, the Plutocrats NEVER would have gotten away with undoing a century of progress.
Oh yes, I'm quite sure confiscating every single privately owned gun is not only as easy as writing it down is- but I'm also certain that this will not cause any violent uprisings at all.
The kind of people who would shoot at Government officers enforcing a sensible law are the kinds I don't mind getting out of the gene pool.
you are a cowardly moron whose feelings of timidity are accentuated by being exposed to men who make their own safety a personal duty. People like us remind you of your failings as a man and you want to exorcise your deficiencies by banning guns
they shouldn't be shooting at government agents (enforcing your idea of a reasonable gun law). they should be targeting the soft targets who pushed for such a law as well as the politicians (and family members of said politicians) who enacted such idiotic laws
they shouldn't be shooting at government agents (enforcing your idea of a reasonable gun law). they should be targeting the soft targets who pushed for such a law as well as the politicians (and family members of said politicians) who enacted such idiotic laws
Yeah. That would definitely make us want to take you all out htat much faster.
Most of us are tired of sharing our streets with gun nuts.
you are a cowardly moron whose feelings of timidity are accentuated by being exposed to men who make their own safety a personal duty. People like us remind you of your failings as a man and you want to exorcise your deficiencies by banning guns
Guy, I was in the army for 11 years, thanks.
The problem with guys like you who need a gun to make up for a tiny pecker is that you don't make anyone safer. A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a family member than a bad guy.
ah the idiocy about penis extension. Your stupid study by Kellerman has been debunked to the point that it shows you are a liar.
ah the idiocy about penis extension. Your stupid study by Kellerman has been debunked to the point that it shows you are a liar.
Kellerman's never been debunked.
Oh, so now you are a Green Beret and a Federal Agent. YOu have more career changes than fucking Barbie.
ah the idiocy about penis extension. Your stupid study by Kellerman has been debunked to the point that it shows you are a liar.
Kellerman's never been debunked.
Oh, so now you are a Green Beret and a Federal Agent. YOu have more career changes than fucking Barbie.
ah the idiocy about penis extension. Your stupid study by Kellerman has been debunked to the point that it shows you are a liar.
Kellerman's never been debunked.
Oh, so now you are a Green Beret and a Federal Agent. YOu have more career changes than fucking Barbie.
Kellerman the uninformed, failed gun grabbing asshole
For instance-
Handguns are 43 times more likely to kill a member of your own family than an intruder
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
ah the idiocy about penis extension. Your stupid study by Kellerman has been debunked to the point that it shows you are a liar.
Kellerman's never been debunked.
Oh, so now you are a Green Beret and a Federal Agent. YOu have more career changes than fucking Barbie.
Kellerman the uninformed, failed gun grabbing asshole
For instance-
Handguns are 43 times more likely to kill a member of your own family than an intruder
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
He also counted as a "firearm in the home" cases where an intruder brought the gun and that gun was used to shoot someone. Or homes where the guns in the home were not the ones that caused the injury
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
1) Sucide victims are just as dead as murder victims.
2) No one believes that you gun nuts show calm and restraint 99% of the time. NOt the way you all talk about the way you want to do a "ZImmerman" on some scary negro.
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
1) Sucide victims are just as dead as murder victims.
2) No one believes that you gun nuts show calm and restraint 99% of the time. NOt the way you all talk about the way you want to do a "ZImmerman" on some scary negro.
The study by Arthur Kellermann from which that statistic is pulled doesn't say that. The number includes suicides. The study doesn't take into account defensive uses in which a shot was not fired (99% of the uses), and it doesn't reflect intruders avoiding homes with firearms inside.
1) Sucide victims are just as dead as murder victims.
2) No one believes that you gun nuts show calm and restraint 99% of the time. NOt the way you all talk about the way you want to do a "ZImmerman" on some scary negro.
Lol.
Hey moron. the facts prove that gun "nuts" (as the panty wetting eunuchs call gun rights advocates) show restraint and levels far above 90% of the time. If you actually believed the crap you spew, you'd be terrified to insult gun owners. the fact that you know gun "nuts" won't act like homicidal nut cases even towards gaping assholes who insult them, proves my point
Your irrational fear is no reason to take away rights. Sorry. Maybe some people don't want to hear your free speech.
gun rights don't kill anyone dimtard. what laws are going to stop suicide?Your irrational fear is no reason to take away rights. Sorry. Maybe some people don't want to hear your free speech.
If my "Free Speech" killed 32,000 people a year and injured another 78,000, you might have a point other than the one on the top of your head.
Why yes even the rwer's of the anachronistic anarchy party have aligned with liberals....The left doesn't think things through very carefully.
They don't "think" at all, except perhaps at the highest levels, but it's quite obvious their ultimate goal is the destruction of western society.
The common bed wetter is just a lemming that will fight over the chance to leap off the cliff.
