Why hasn’t the FBI raided Hillary Clinton’s Attorneys Office?

Mueller dragging this out has been a huge dis-service to this country,

There is a deep state, and it has been activated by the former adminstration

And by 'dragging this out' you mean continuing his investigation and the Trumpsters are pissed off that he has spent a whole year on it.

LOL
 
Raid the office for what ?

What does it matter? In another thread you thought it was okay for Trump's attorney's office to be raided because it's no big deal if he had nothing to hide.

This is why I hate partisans on both sides of the aisle.

Your excuse why it's okay to raid Trump's attorney is a dangerous reason, it is just as dangerous as the right using the same excuse to raid Hillary's attorney.

The right went after Bill Clinton because they wanted revenge for the left going after Richard Nixon. The left went after George Bush, the right went after Barrack Obama and now the left is going after Trump.

Dig up dirt and we will continue to attract scum for candidates.

Oh stop with the silly "THEY ARE BOTH THE SAME" crap. You know the crazy right wing is nuts, and nobody else is near the stupid they display.

Lol! You are the same and you don’t see it. You lefties and righties shift with the wind.

Hell, you wing nuts rioted, tried to overturn the results of the election and went to impeach Trump before he was sworn in. You partisan idiots are all the same.

The right is past the point of even trying to defend their behavior. The best you can do is try to say everybody is guilty if the same thing. We both know that is bullshit, but I guess you gotta go with the only shot you have left.
Trump is going to undo everything of the past 25 years and you are going to bend over and LIKE IT and ask for more.

How much is Trump going to bribe all of us for that?

That is his m.o. for screwing Americans over.
 
No probable cause because she's done nothing illegal.
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
 
No probable cause because she's done nothing illegal.
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump
 
No probable cause because she's done nothing illegal.
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.
 
Equiring minds WANT to know!
Because the head honchos are a bunch of partisan hacks. After all, they exonerated the lying BITCH before the investigation was over. There is also the fact that it was not up to them to clear Hillary. Their job is to collect evidence then turn it over to the Justice department, who would then make a decision to try her for her many crimes. Assuming the Justice department wasn't also a bunch of partisan hacks. Big assumption there.
 
Equiring minds WANT to know!
Because the head honchos are a bunch of partisan hacks. .

If they were all really 'partisan hacks' why didn't Comey:
a) Announce in his press conference that Hillary Clinton had done absolutely nothing wrong- that it was all just a witchhunt against her?
b) Why did Comey just before the election announce he was reopening the investigation?
c) Why didn't Comey announce that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign for collusion with Russia?

Comey could have done any of those things- and almost certainly Trump would not have been elected considering how close his margins were in the key states that made the difference.

But Comey didn't.

So much for 'partisan hacks'.

Now a partisan hack is like Nunes who runs off to snitch to Trump when his committee finds out something.
 
Mueller dragging this out has been a huge dis-service to this country,

There is a deep state, and it has been activated by the former adminstration

And by 'dragging this out' you mean continuing his investigation and the Trumpsters are pissed off that he has spent a whole year on it.

LOL
. What kind of investigator or prosecutor spends a year or more trying to investigate one thing that he was charged with to investigate ???.

I mean does this dumb ace country ever believe in getting it's money's worth anymore ?? Is corruption so bad that nothing can be trusted anymore ???

Bragging on Mueller might be the funniest thing to come down the pike lately. This former FBI guy who is trying to save face for his Ego maniac friend Comey is so scripted that it ain't even funny.
 
No probable cause because she's done nothing illegal.
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
. Why would you destroy evidence if there wasn't a crime ?? Hmmmmmm ????
 
No probable cause because she's done nothing illegal.
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
. Why would you destroy evidence if there wasn't a crime ?? Hmmmmmm ????

If there was no crime than it wouldn't be evidence.

Hmmmmmm
 
Mueller dragging this out has been a huge dis-service to this country,

There is a deep state, and it has been activated by the former adminstration

And by 'dragging this out' you mean continuing his investigation and the Trumpsters are pissed off that he has spent a whole year on it.

LOL
. What kind of investigator or prosecutor spends a year or more trying to investigate one thing that he was charged with to investigate ???..
Ken Starr
Kenneth_W._Starr.jpg
 
Destroyed evidence every time she was caught
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.


By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.
 
No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!! :laugh2:
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.


By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

Yet to hear it from the Clinton haters at the same time she has done everything from personally blowing Vince Foster away to single handedly selling all of Americas Uranium to the Russians.

She is both clumsy and inept- and a criminal mastermind!
 
Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.


By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

Yet to hear it from the Clinton haters at the same time she has done everything from personally blowing Vince Foster away to single handedly selling all of Americas Uranium to the Russians.

She is both clumsy and inept- and a criminal mastermind!


And Stephen Hawking couldn't even hold a pencil yet wrote books on physics with the help of others! Hillary was too inept and clumsy to do anything herself, but smart and crooked enough to hire others to do it for her so they could take the fall while her hands stayed clean. BTW, Vince Foster committed suicide.
 
Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?
Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.


By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

Yet to hear it from the Clinton haters at the same time she has done everything from personally blowing Vince Foster away to single handedly selling all of Americas Uranium to the Russians.

She is both clumsy and inept- and a criminal mastermind!


And Stephen Hawking couldn't even hold a pencil yet wrote books on physics with the help of others! Hillary was too inept and clumsy to do anything herself, but smart and crooked enough to hire others to do it for her so they could take the fall while her hands stayed clean. BTW, Vince Foster committed suicide.

Yeah Vince Foster did commit suicide- yet myriads of Clinton haters are convinced she killed him.

Meanwhile of course- Trump is smart and crooked enough to hire talented yes men to clean up after him and take the fall for him to keep his little hands clean. That is the the Trump way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top