Why hasn’t the FBI raided Hillary Clinton’s Attorneys Office?

[BULLDOG]

No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!!

Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?

Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.

By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

What a childish remark.

 

[toobfreak]

By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

What a childish remark.

What a Leftist says when they can't find a single point of contention to really disagree with.

 

[JakeStarkey]

America does not care what trumpers say.

 

[BULLDOG]

By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

What a childish remark.

What a Leftist says when they can't find a single point of contention to really disagree with.

More like what a Leftist says when they can't find a single point of contention worth responding to. Sometimes it's best to just let childish RWNJ remarks speak for themselves.

 

[jillian]

Equiring minds WANT to know!

because they aren't criminal you insane twat

 

[toobfreak]

By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

What a childish remark.

What a Leftist says when they can't find a single point of contention to really disagree with.

More like what a Leftist says when they can't find a single point of contention worth responding to. Sometimes it's best to just let childish RWNJ remarks speak for themselves.

Except it was Hillary who:

• Repeatedly denied knowing how to use smartphones.
• Repeatedly claimed to only have one, not many, thus needing to put everything on her computer for convenience.
• Repeatedly trips, falls, and stumbles, coughing.
• Gave herself a concussion and head bruise.
• Asked about wiping a hard drive clean with a cloth.
• Then lies about and changes her story on everything.

It takes a real child and a derp to then try to call such irrefutable statements "childish." Do you really need to see the video again of each of the above to be reminded how wrong you are? Please DENY that any of the above are true! I dare you!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Equiring minds WANT to know!

If they did, the Stalinist democrats would lose their shit.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Hillary don't count, and real America does not care about what neo-stalinist Trumpers think: they just don't count.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Raid the office for what ?

30,000 destroyed emails.

The Clinton lawyers were destroying evidence as fast as they could.

 

[JakeStarkey]

 

[John Shaw]

Because no one cares about Hillary Clinton.

 

[Timmy]

Raid the office for what ?

30,000 destroyed emails.

The Clinton lawyers were destroying evidence as fast as they could.

You can’t unilaterally destroy emails. They go two ways . Those were her personal emails. You can get state department emails from their server.

 

[beagle9]

Destroyed evidence every time she was caught

No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!!

Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?

. Why would you destroy evidence if there wasn't a crime ?? Hmmmmmm ????

If there was no crime than it wouldn't be evidence.

Hmmmmmm

.Was there an attempt to cover up a crime ? You can't know that, but in your defense you will of course claim for the alledged destroyer of evidence that there was no crime.

 

[beagle9]

Had she been elected we'd be seeing pretty much the same as with Trump

No indication Hillary would have almost started a nuclear war over a silly tweet.

By all indications, Hillary is so clumsy, inept and computer illiterate that she doesn't even know how to tweet---- had she ever tried, she likely would have tripped over her own feet coughing, stumbled, fallen over her computer knocking herself out as she wiped the hard drive clean with her cloth, then denied it ever happened.

Yet to hear it from the Clinton haters at the same time she has done everything from personally blowing Vince Foster away to single handedly selling all of Americas Uranium to the Russians.

She is both clumsy and inept- and a criminal mastermind!

And Stephen Hawking couldn't even hold a pencil yet wrote books on physics with the help of others! Hillary was too inept and clumsy to do anything herself, but smart and crooked enough to hire others to do it for her so they could take the fall while her hands stayed clean. BTW, Vince Foster committed suicide.

Yeah Vince Foster did commit suicide- yet myriads of Clinton haters are convinced she killed him.

Meanwhile of course- Trump is smart and crooked enough to hire talented yes men to clean up after him and take the fall for him to keep his little hands clean. That is the the Trump way.

And yet your Trump hate leads you down the same paths you accuse others of.. lol

 

[beagle9]

Mueller dragging this out has been a huge dis-service to this country,

There is a deep state, and it has been activated by the former adminstration

And by 'dragging this out' you mean continuing his investigation and the Trumpsters are pissed off that he has spent a whole year on it.

LOL

. What kind of investigator or prosecutor spends a year or more trying to investigate one thing that he was charged with to investigate ???..

Ken Starr

So your saying he set the precedent eh ??

Maybe so, but the people will decide when enough is enough of the bullcrap, and hopefully soon. To show a house divided unto the world is to invite calamity or chaos into that house. It never ends well.

 

[Syriusly]

Mueller dragging this out has been a huge dis-service to this country,

There is a deep state, and it has been activated by the former adminstration

And by 'dragging this out' you mean continuing his investigation and the Trumpsters are pissed off that he has spent a whole year on it.

LOL

. What kind of investigator or prosecutor spends a year or more trying to investigate one thing that he was charged with to investigate ???..

Ken Starr

So your saying he set the precedent eh ??

Maybe so, but the people will decide when enough is enough of the bullcrap, and hopefully soon. To show a house divided unto the world is to invite calamity or chaos into that house. It never ends well.

For 8 years the Republicans tried everything they could to show the world that our house was divided. We survived.

The best case scenario is for Mueller to complete his investigation and to give Trump a clean bill of health.

I do not understand why the Republicans are afraid of that.

 

[Syriusly]

No evidence, so it must have been destroyed? With that kind of logic no wonder they can't get a warrant. Maroons!!!

Clinton admitted to destroying evidence.

Well destroying evidence of a crime would require that there be a crime. What crime was that evidence of?

When was Clinton indicted?

. Why would you destroy evidence if there wasn't a crime ?? Hmmmmmm ????

If there was no crime than it wouldn't be evidence.

Hmmmmmm

.Was there an attempt to cover up a crime ? You can't know that, but in your defense you will of course claim for the alledged destroyer of evidence that there was no crime.

Was there a crime? You can't know that- but that doesn't stop you from accusing her of destroying evidence of that crime.

 

[Syriusly]

Raid the office for what ?

30,000 destroyed emails.

The Clinton lawyers were destroying evidence as fast as they could.

What evidence? Evidence of what crime?

 

[Syriusly]

Equiring minds WANT to know!

If they did, the Stalinist democrats would lose their shit.

If enquiring minds found out, the Fascist Republicans would lose your shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Raid the office for what ?

30,000 destroyed emails.

The Clinton lawyers were destroying evidence as fast as they could.

What evidence? Evidence of what crime?

Don't be a retard; Comrade.

Hillary Clinton’s Email Lawyers: Cheryl Mills & Heather Samuelson’s Problematic Representation of Hillary Clinton. | National Review

You can't lie this into the cornfield.