Why I'm dropping my opposition to SSM

Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:

I think it is about the desire to accept the inevitable and work towards a common understanding with respect for all people involved.
Whether or not we like it ... Whether or not we agree with each other ... If we are a family, we would not have the choice as to who is involved and who we can leave on the doorstep.

Your brother or sister will always be your sibling ... Whether or not you approve of what they do.


I had no idea what he meant by "SSM". But I FIOAAW. MHTEI (in the OP). SMH.

Now I know my A B C's

Next time won't you sing with me!


OBTW, just an FYI, LMNOP
 
Hey, IAM. I just figure when you FTE your OP you're being DO. WTF is UWT? Is it really TC to SIO? IDK but now that I know what it is I'm NRI.

Your attempts to be obtuse are a product of your misunderstanding ... Not the product of the OP's inability to express a point.
Where you may not have understood what the OP meant by SSM ... Everyone else that responded did ... Because we have the ability to investigate the reasonable possibilities.

.
 
Hey, IAM. I just figure when you FTE your OP you're being DO. WTF is UWT? Is it really TC to SIO? IDK but now that I know what it is I'm NRI.

Your attempts to be obtuse are a product of your misunderstanding ... Not the product of the OP's inability to express a point.
Where you may not have understood what the OP meant by SSM ... Everyone else that responded did ... Because we have the ability to investigate the reasonable possibilities.

Uh-- no, not everyone.
Point is I had to read several posts to figure it out, which was a waste of time. The OP should have just essplained wtf he was talking about in the first place. I ain't the one making up my own code here, except in mockery thereof.
 
Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:

I think it is about the desire to accept the inevitable and work towards a common understanding with respect for all people involved.
Whether or not we like it ... Whether or not we agree with each other ... If we are a family, we would not have the choice as to who is involved and who we can leave on the doorstep.

Your brother or sister will always be your sibling ... Whether or not you approve of what they do.


I had no idea what he meant by "SSM". But I FIOAAW. MHTEI (in the OP). SMH.

Now I know my A B C's

Next time won't you sing with me!


OBTW, just an FYI, LMNOP

"Our MP saw the PM this AM and the PM wants more LSD from the PIB by tomorrow AM or PM at the latest. I told the PM's PPS that AM was NBG so tomorrow PM it is for the PM." -- John Cleese
 
Uh-- no, not everyone.
Point is I had to read several posts to figure it out, which was a waste of time. The OP should have just essplained wtf he was talking about in the first place. I ain't the one making up my own code here, except in mockery thereof.

Yeah, whatever ... It is not like I am waiting for you to agree, nor to stop grasping for straws ... We all know you are incorrigible and will protest to the last breath.
You needed the explanation for your shortcomings ... To which I attempted to help you in some small measure.

To which you (as usual) become defensive and combative ... Attempting to explain to the rest of us that your failure to understand is somehow relevant to the discussion.

No matter ... It's all good!

.
 
Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:

I think it is about the desire to accept the inevitable and work towards a common understanding with respect for all people involved.
Whether or not we like it ... Whether or not we agree with each other ... If we are a family, we would not have the choice as to who is involved and who we can leave on the doorstep.

Your brother or sister will always be your sibling ... Whether or not you approve of what they do.


I had no idea what he meant by "SSM". But I FIOAAW. MHTEI (in the OP). SMH.

Now I know my A B C's

Next time won't you sing with me!


OBTW, just an FYI, LMNOP

"Our MP saw the PM this AM and the PM wants more LSD from the PIB by tomorrow AM or PM at the latest. I told the PM's PPS that AM was NBG so tomorrow PM it is for the PM." -- John Cleese

I'm overdue to pass out, my response will come later! Maybe
 
Uh-- no, not everyone.
Point is I had to read several posts to figure it out, which was a waste of time. The OP should have just essplained wtf he was talking about in the first place. I ain't the one making up my own code here, except in mockery thereof.

Yeah, whatever ... It is not like I am waiting for you to agree, nor to stop grasping for straws ... We all know you are incorrigible and will protest to the last breath.
You needed the explanation for your shortcomings ... To which I attempted to help you in some small measure.

To which you (as usual) become defensive and combative ... Attempting to explain to the rest of us that your failure to understand is somehow relevant to the discussion.

No matter ... It's all good!

.

I'm thinking if I would have posted a thread titled "I'm dropping my opposition to S&M", pogo would have understood?
 
Uh-- no, not everyone.
Point is I had to read several posts to figure it out, which was a waste of time. The OP should have just essplained wtf he was talking about in the first place. I ain't the one making up my own code here, except in mockery thereof.

Yeah, whatever ... It is not like I am waiting for you to agree, nor to stop grasping for straws ... We all know you are incorrigible and will protest to the last breath.

Idle flattery will get you everywhere. :eusa_shifty:

You needed the explanation for your shortcomings ... To which I attempted to help you in some small measure.

Well no -- you tried to blame the victim. :nono:

To which you (as usual) become defensive and combative ... Attempting to explain to the rest of us that your failure to understand is somehow relevant to the discussion.

Mwah? :eusa_angel:

The obscurity of the title (and whatever USSC means, I'm guessing college sports) isn't an offense to me personally.... it's a deep insult on the entire human race. A gross obloquy sullying the entire noble history of human discourse since Aristotle, or at least since this morning.

Thus I, man's humble servant, question only on behalf of The People. Fuck not with The People. For lo, The People control the Beer.

No matter ... It's all good!


:beer:
 
Uh-- no, not everyone.
Point is I had to read several posts to figure it out, which was a waste of time. The OP should have just essplained wtf he was talking about in the first place. I ain't the one making up my own code here, except in mockery thereof.

Yeah, whatever ... It is not like I am waiting for you to agree, nor to stop grasping for straws ... We all know you are incorrigible and will protest to the last breath.
You needed the explanation for your shortcomings ... To which I attempted to help you in some small measure.

To which you (as usual) become defensive and combative ... Attempting to explain to the rest of us that your failure to understand is somehow relevant to the discussion.

No matter ... It's all good!

.

I'm thinking if I would have posted a thread titled "I'm dropping my opposition to S&M", pogo would have understood?

I already knew you were down wit dat. :whip:
 
I ended my opposition to Same Sex marriage years ago when I realized that the compromise that was proposed- Civil Unions- was being fought against as strongly as marriage.

I never objected to homosexuals being able to marry each other, but I didn't think society would be willing to accept it- and Civil Unions seems like a reasonable compromise- about 10-20 years ago.

But now? America has undergone a sea change- and I welcome others to the institution of marriage that my wife and I are members of.
 
The flaw in your analogy is that you fought to keep it together and wanted it to work. No one is fighting to keep the national family together. It's time to divorce.
more rw revolutionary rhetoric :tinfoil: Remember what happened last time you people did that Sugar Shorts?
Was there a revolution when the Soviet Union broke up? It just collapsed.

There will be no grand revolution in the US. The various tribes will just get further and further apart and coalesce into distinct communities that simply have no interest in any other community. There might be some intertribal skirmishes but that's about all.
so what "tribe" are you in pray tell? Tipsycatlover
 
Libersls aren't noted for their intelligence but in diverting the subject to something they like better.

It is time for the United States to break apart. There is no more one nation but a collection of squabbling tribes that no longer want to live together. If this was a family, it would be getting a divorce.
Given your posting history, this post included, you're in no position to question any one's intelligence.
^ that
 
Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:

I think it is about the desire to accept the inevitable and work towards a common understanding with respect for all people involved.
Whether or not we like it ... Whether or not we agree with each other ... If we are a family, we would not have the choice as to who is involved and who we can leave on the doorstep.

Your brother or sister will always be your sibling ... Whether or not you approve of what they do.

.

^^^^ this
 
The flaw in your analogy is that you fought to keep it together and wanted it to work. No one is fighting to keep the national family together. It's time to divorce.
more rw revolutionary rhetoric :tinfoil: Remember what happened last time you people did that Sugar Shorts?
Was there a revolution when the Soviet Union broke up? It just collapsed.

There will be no grand revolution in the US. The various tribes will just get further and further apart and coalesce into distinct communities that simply have no interest in any other community. There might be some intertribal skirmishes but that's about all.
so what "tribe" are you in pray tell? Tipsycatlover
Normals. Unless you really want a tribal affiliation. Then it would be Iroquois. I'll stay with normals.
 
Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:
It is a public service announcement about what drinking too much does to the brain. Always do things in moderation.

^^^^^ LIES ^^^^^^

I always get moderately drunk, I only drink in excess before or after lunch!
I am perfect. I don't drink, use drugs, gamble, look at porn, and I don't like sex. I am incorruptable. I have no vices.
 
Anyone have a clue what this thread is about? Or are we just wingin' it? :dunno:
It is a public service announcement about what drinking too much does to the brain. Always do things in moderation.

^^^^^ LIES ^^^^^^

I always get moderately drunk, I only drink in excess before or after lunch!
I am perfect. I don't drink, use drugs, gamble, look at porn, and I don't like sex. I am incorruptable. I have no vices.

I don't do drugs
 
I ended my opposition to Same Sex marriage years ago when I realized that the compromise that was proposed- Civil Unions- was being fought against as strongly as marriage.

I never objected to homosexuals being able to marry each other, but I didn't think society would be willing to accept it- and Civil Unions seems like a reasonable compromise- about 10-20 years ago.

But now? America has undergone a sea change- and I welcome others to the institution of marriage that my wife and I are members of.

As I said earlier in this thread, I had the opportunity to participate in a gay wedding last Saturday.

It was in a public park. There was a hispanic family who came to the park to let their kids play. They all gathered at the edge of where our celebration took place, and watched. When the brides walked back down the aisle, to our applause, they all clapped as well. So did the two senior citizens who had also stopped to watch.

The times they are a changin.
 
There you go absolute proof that hispanics are no longer catholic and seniors are gay.
 
The flaw in your analogy is that you fought to keep it together and wanted it to work. No one is fighting to keep the national family together. It's time to divorce.
more rw revolutionary rhetoric :tinfoil: Remember what happened last time you people did that Sugar Shorts?
Was there a revolution when the Soviet Union broke up? It just collapsed.

There will be no grand revolution in the US. The various tribes will just get further and further apart and coalesce into distinct communities that simply have no interest in any other community. There might be some intertribal skirmishes but that's about all.
so what "tribe" are you in pray tell? Tipsycatlover
Normals. Unless you really want a tribal affiliation. Then it would be Iroquois. I'll stay with normals.
Why are you people obsessed with what others do in the privacy of their own home? 4th Amendment much? :eusa_eh: :doubt:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top