cbirch2
Active Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 1,394
- 49
- 36
This statement is unsupportable.Obama's record on private sector job creation is better than Bush's.How is The Obama not worse than GWB?
What?
Its a math problem....
I guess its unsupportable if you cant do math.
Most liberals would be happy to have this to their credit. I guess the fact that you have to hate everything Republican and are desperate to find ways to justify your support of your Secular Messiah taints this.
We dont just have to hate on republicans because theyre republicans. Were not as petty as, say, the republicans candidates for president.
Rather, your party just fucks shit up so much its pretty easy to be against it. And not just policy-wise, i mean they fuck simple, every day explanations of how things work.
Michelle Bachmann once said: "its not hard to get the economy going again, we know what to do! All you have to do is cut spending!"
Really? Thats the legitimate position of one of your candidates for president? Thats less than pathetic, thats worthless.
The Obama is exceeding that rate of growth in leaps and bounds - amnd The Obama has, in under 4 years, exceeded the total deficit run up under GWB.
Yea lets pretend bush didnt create the largest recession in 70 years. Can you clearly articulate what obama has done to increase spending so much? Can you really?
So basically obama has been the exact same as bush, although a lot more volatile. Possibly slightly more spending, mostly because its a recession. But as you can see, the real problem is pretty much revenue, since its a recession.
The DJI had its record high under GWB.The S&P 500 is up 50% since Obama took office,
Lets brag that bush inflated a bubble, shall we?
Lol....
You make those statements sound like they are related.Bush pussed out when Musharraf told him special forces couldn't enter Pakistan, Obama actually got Bin Laden.
They arent?
Admit it - you like The Obama because you drank the kool-aid and don't have the intellectual honesty to admit you made a mistake.
I like obama because i like numbers. and the numbers and the stats clearly disagree with just about everything you say.
Last edited: