Trakar
VIP Member
- Feb 28, 2011
- 1,699
- 74
- 83
Your version of feedback only works if water vapor is a positive forcer.
I see your understandings of feedback is as poor as the rest of your scientific understandings.
not just blog science, journal rejected drool spatters in which you seem to find images of puppies and butterflies.
So you feel that the fact (according to this paper's findings) that water vapor amounts to a small fraction of the warming forced by anthropogenic ghgs and that the authors of the paper don't draw any conclusions in their stating that it's not clear whether the water vapor changes are caused by a climate feedback or decadal variability:
...Our analysis focuses only on estimating the contributions of stratospheric water vapor changes to recent decadal rates of warming; additional contributions such as from solar variations (33), aerosols, natural variability, or other processes are not ruled out by this study.
...It is therefore not clear whether the stratospheric water vapor changes represent a feedback to global average climate change or a source of decadal variability. Current global climate models suggest that the stratospheric water vapor feedback to global warming due to carbon dioxide increases is weak...
No mainstream climate researcher that I am aware of ignores nor misattributes water vapor in their consideration of climate change issues