Why is it okay to kill unborn children but wrong to kill convicted murderers?

[MAGAman]

Came across this question a couple days ago.

Liberals love abortion but hate the death penalty. Seems a little hypocritical since both involve the taking of a human life. The only difference is, unborn children haven’t viciously murdered anyone. Why do liberals deem the life of a killer more important that that of an innocent child?

How can you be pro-life and for the death penalty and war?

Simple.

Unborn children are innocent. Convicted murderers are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, are given lawyers, rights, a judge, and a jury.

War is a necessary act of self defense or defense of others.

Now explain how a convicted murderer has more right to life than an innocent baby

 

[MAGAman]

don't know if it's possible, but you avoided the question.

You support a man's right to abort his child if he can do so without harming the mother, is that correct? Yes or No?

I don't work with impossible hypotheticals...You might as well ask me if it's okay to hunt Unicorns with vorpal blades.

I accept your surrender.

 

[Thinker101]

Came across this question a couple days ago.

Liberals love abortion but hate the death penalty. Seems a little hypocritical since both involve the taking of a human life. The only difference is, unborn children haven’t viciously murdered anyone. Why do liberals deem the life of a killer more important that that of an innocent child?

How can you be pro-life and for the death penalty and war?

Simple.

Unborn children are innocent. Convicted murderers are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, are given lawyers, rights, a judge, and a jury.

War is a necessary act of self defense or defense of others.

Now explain how a convicted murderer has more right to life than an innocent baby

You may be on to something, let the unborn have lawyers, rights, a judge and a jury.

 

[MAGAman]

Came across this question a couple days ago.

Liberals love abortion but hate the death penalty. Seems a little hypocritical since both involve the taking of a human life. The only difference is, unborn children haven’t viciously murdered anyone. Why do liberals deem the life of a killer more important that that of an innocent child?

How can you be pro-life and for the death penalty and war?

Simple.

Unborn children are innocent. Convicted murderers are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, are given lawyers, rights, a judge, and a jury.

War is a necessary act of self defense or defense of others.

Now explain how a convicted murderer has more right to life than an innocent baby

You may be on to something, let the unborn have lawyers, rights, a judge and a jury.

And if they're found guilty of a capitol crime, abort them.

 

[Thinker101]

Came across this question a couple days ago.

Liberals love abortion but hate the death penalty. Seems a little hypocritical since both involve the taking of a human life. The only difference is, unborn children haven’t viciously murdered anyone. Why do liberals deem the life of a killer more important that that of an innocent child?

How can you be pro-life and for the death penalty and war?

Simple.

Unborn children are innocent. Convicted murderers are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, are given lawyers, rights, a judge, and a jury.

War is a necessary act of self defense or defense of others.

Now explain how a convicted murderer has more right to life than an innocent baby

You may be on to something, let the unborn have lawyers, rights, a judge and a jury.

And if they're found guilty of a capitol crime, abort them.

If no capitol crime, the parents go to prison.

 

[talksalot]

The liberal mind believes no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

 

[JoeB131]

I accept your surrender.

You made up an impossible situation and then asked if I thought it was wrong.

You can't induce an abortion without affecting the woman... Sorry you don't get this. Maybe someone should have explained how sex works at an early age... then maybe you could get with a real live woman.

 

[MAGAman]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

 

[JoeB131]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

Morality is a point of view. Cannibals think they are moral.

The Klan thought it was moral.

 

[miketx]

Why do you think every fetus is sacred but every welfare baby needs to be abandoned by the system?

Here they go again, pretending to know what people think.

 

[Taz]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

You mean like taking responsibility for the bogus invasion of Iraq? Who has so far?

 

[beagle9]

Why do you think every fetus is sacred but every welfare baby needs to be abandoned by the system?

No mention of the murderers ??? Of course not.

 

[JoeB131]

Why do you think every fetus is sacred but every welfare baby needs to be abandoned by the system?

Here they go again, pretending to know what people think.

we don't pretend, we can observe by your policies...

 

[MAGAman]

I accept your surrender.

You made up an impossible situation and then asked if I thought it was wrong.

You can't induce an abortion without affecting the woman... Sorry you don't get this. Maybe someone should have explained how sex works at an early age... then maybe you could get with a real live woman.

It's not impossible.

Its just that you can't answer because your position is indefensible.

We both know that.

 

[JoeB131]

It's not impossible.

Its just that you can't answer because your position is indefensible.

We both know that.

Okay, tell me a way that a man can induce an abortion without harming the woman, that wouldn't count as assault in a legal sense.

We'll wait.

 

[beagle9]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

You mean like taking responsibility for the bogus invasion of Iraq? Who has so far?

The changing of a regime is an awesome task, and Sadam along with his terror boys had to go (everyone agreed). The citizens of Iraq cheered the American's getting this job done for them, as so did the world, but the undermining commies here destroyed or tried to destroy any gains made there. Then came Obama and Hillary, and it got ten times worse, and then came Bengazi where it was really revealed who the undermining forces were in this country.

Then came Trump, the fixer.

 

[Taz]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

You mean like taking responsibility for the bogus invasion of Iraq? Who has so far?

The changing of a regime is an awesome task, and Sadam along with his terror boys had to go (everyone agreed). The citizens of Iraq cheered the American's getting this job done for them, as so did the world, but the undermining commies here destroyed or tried to destroy any gains made there. Then came Obama and Hillary, and it got ten times worse, and then came Bengazi where it was really revealed who the undermining forces were in this country.

Then came Trump, the fixer.

It was a fake invasion, meaning no WMDs.

 

[MAGAman]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

You mean like taking responsibility for the bogus invasion of Iraq? Who has so far?

There was no bogus invasion of Iraq.

Those that voted to fund and support the invasion did so based on current intelligence.

 

[Taz]

The liberal mind pretends to believe no one should have to accept responsibility for their own actions. Especially when those actions are immoral.

You mean like taking responsibility for the bogus invasion of Iraq? Who has so far?

There was no bogus invasion of Iraq.

Those that voted to fund and support the invasion did so based on current intelligence.

The intelligence was faked. No WMDs in Iraq.

 

[MAGAman]

It's not impossible.

Its just that you can't answer because your position is indefensible.

We both know that.

Okay, tell me a way that a man can induce an abortion without harming the woman, that wouldn't count as assault in a legal sense.

We'll wait.

You just can't grow up and cut your losses can you?

How it happens doesn't matter.

Ethics never depend on the specific method, just the intention.

Supporting Abortion is about Virtue Signalling, not about ethical considerations. Therefore you can't support abortion unless it signals support for leftist causes.