Why is it primarily Democrats that can't vote in person with a free voter ID? Why don't Republicans have the same difficulty?

[progressive hunter]

what did I claim other than they are treating sick people??

Don’t worry about it. You’re too disconnected from reality to even acknowledge what you said a few hours ago.

whats that make you that you cant tell me what it was,,

just prove your claim,,

 

[colfax_m]

If it was 20%, it could change an entire election given the mass amounts of mail-in last year.

If it was 20%, we’d know it was happening.

 

[colfax_m]

whats that make you that you cant tell me what it was,,

English please?

 

[progressive hunter]

whats that make you that you cant tell me what it was,,

English please?

that was english dumbass,,

now prove your claim,,,

 

[Utilitarian]

If it was 20%, it could change an entire election given the mass amounts of mail-in last year.

If it was 20%, we’d know it was happening.

I don't think the fraud happening in the US was particularly high in any area. However, in close elections, you don't need 20%.

In a lot of areas, just 1% fraud is enough to throw an election. Biden won some areas by less than 1%.

So the problem with fraud isn't typically that it's huge. It's that close elections don't require much fraud to throw.

 

[colfax_m]

that was english dumbass,,

Those were English words, but that wasn’t English grammar.

 

[colfax_m]

So the problem with fraud isn't typically that it's huge. It's that close elections don't require much fraud to throw.

Huge is a relative term. Tens of thousands of vote is huge. It doesn’t happen without people noticing.

 

[Utilitarian]

So the problem with fraud isn't typically that it's huge. It's that close elections don't require much fraud to throw.

Huge is a relative term. Tens of thousands of vote is huge. It doesn’t happen without people noticing.

When committing fraud, all that matters is that certain people don't notice. There were a lot of shenanigans involving election observers.

 

[colfax_m]

When committing fraud, all that matters is that certain people don't notice. There were a lot of shenanigans involving election observers.

It’s not possible to keep such a big conspiracy secret. The system is too robust.

 

[Utilitarian]

When committing fraud, all that matters is that certain people don't notice. There were a lot of shenanigans involving election observers.

It’s not possible to keep such a big conspiracy secret. The system is too robust.

I don't have the same faith in the system that you do. I wish I did.

 

[progressive hunter]

that was english dumbass,,

Those were English words, but that wasn’t English grammar.

so youre not going to prove your claim,,

figures cause you are one of the biggest liars on the forum,,

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If it was 20%, we’d know it was happening.

Maybe at 20%, but how about 10%?

If you get a letter from a bank stating you were qualified for a credit card for 10K, and somebody steals that letter and goes to the bank to obtain that credit card in your name, do you think the bank would just hand that card over? Of course not. In spite of that letter with your name on it, that could only have been sent to you, the bank would demand credible identification before issuing that card.

In this country, you need to prove without a doubt that you are indeed that person: taking a house loan, buying beer or tobacco products, issuing a check to purchase something, board an airplane, getting a passport, picking up a package from UPS or the post office, getting a job. But for some reason, you don't have to show positive identification to vote, and the Democrats are pushing to put that on steroids. Just mail your vote in.

 

[Muhammed]

Voter participation was at a record level. Hopefully that continues.

Whats more disturbing is that the same lazy assed people who voted because a ballot was mailed to them wouldn't have voted otherwise.

You're asked to muster the gumption to vote like twice every 2 years...and you're too damn lazy to show up? Disgraceful.

Bullshit. You know as well as I do that the Democrats push early voting (vote early vote often) schemes and mail in schemes because it makes it easier to commit voter fraud.

Without cheating via voter fraud the DNC simply wouldn't exist.

There should be a mandatory death penalty for voter fraud.

 

[jknowgood]

If voting by mail is good for Trump it's good for all.

Not the same, you failed.

 

[pknopp]

Expect rural red counties to have MILLIONS of mail-in votes from now on.

And when they bitch....


BASELESS!!!

The higher the turnout the better.

haha...Why do Mexicrats seem to want the most ignorant, most illiterate voters voting?
Imagine if Amazons board of directors was comprised of the ignorant illiterates you want voting and essentially making decisions for America...How successful would Amazon be?
Why do you want a failed nation?

If we can survive you voting...........

Pretend you have an iQ for once...think about what I said and respond with something sensible.

I replied to you in the way you replied to the post.

 

[pknopp]

Expect rural red counties to have MILLIONS of mail-in votes from now on.

And when they bitch....


BASELESS!!!

The higher the turnout the better.

I can’t wait until voter turnout is 150%, that is a great turnout.

I'm pretty sure you won't live that long.

 

[pknopp]

Everyone registered to vote already has a voter ID.

So if I look in my neighbors mailbox while they are at work to see if they got a mail-in ballot, filled it out and sent it in, who would know?

The entire system when your neighbor went to vote.

 

[pknopp]

If voting by mail is good for Trump it's good for all.

Not the same, you failed.

It seems it's never the same when it comes to Trump. He mailed in his ballot.

 

[jknowgood]

If voting by mail is good for Trump it's good for all.

Not the same, you failed.

It seems it's never the same when it comes to Trump. He mailed in his ballot.

He voted absentee ballot, in which you have to request one, prove who you are, and get a witness to sign it also. Not the same, quit being ignorant. Democrats couldn't pull out absentee ballots out from under the desk and come up with the number they needed. They can and did with mail in ballots.

 

[pknopp]

If voting by mail is good for Trump it's good for all.

Not the same, you failed.

It seems it's never the same when it comes to Trump. He mailed in his ballot.

He voted absentee ballot, in which you have to request one, prove who you are, and get a witness to sign it also. Not the same, quit being ignorant. Democrats couldn't pull out absentee ballots out from under the desk and come up with the number they needed. They can and did with mail in ballots.

You can sign the witness statement left handed. If voting in person is so important you LEAD BY EXAMPLE. Every single president before Trump did.