beautress
Always Faithful
- Sep 28, 2018
- 30,227
- 21,871
The courts of law have been able to institute life without the possibility of parole for someone who's killed a lot of people but destroyed the evidence in all but the case where he killed a woman who was pregnant. Proving that a person killed one person, let alone many others over in the life of a serial murderer just puts them back on the street if they only get the guy on 1 person. However, if it's proved that he killed 2 people, that's a life sentence with no possibility of parole, which means the 14 people they know he killed but can't find a fingerprint and the witnesses are knocked off by personal issues by the defense can be successful. That's why if a pregnant woman is killed, it ups the criminals murder party to zero in court.How could someone be charged with murder if it's not a baby (person). The left claims it's just tissue, or cells.I think the police would notice assault with intention to kill and infanticide death caused by assault.Ahh, this thread again.
So, if I punch a pregnant woman and the baby dies, should I be charged with the murder of the fetus or just simple assault on the woman?
And it has put many a clever serial rapist-murderer away for good. Serial killers have a higher recidivism rate than the prison population at large. They're dangerous before, during and after their incarceration. Only afterward, they're a lot more careful about evidence-destruction.