Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No you didn't, moron. You quoted some fake news "journalist" talking about what Mewler said.Mueller apparently doesn't even know what he authorized Mewler to investigate, if that's the case. However, notice that you didn't actually quote Mewler saying that.It's called following the money [emoji383]
Huh?
It's called investigating things you are not tasked with.
Mueller is investigating Trump colluding with Putin to rig the 2016 election.
Period.
Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
"Rosenstein said Special Counsel Robert Mueller can investigate any crimes that he might discover within the scope of his probe, but the deputy attorney general would not discuss which individuals are the subject of their inquiry. The interview comes days after Trump said he believes it would be inappropriate for Mueller to dig into Trump family finances."
No, I quoted his boss and the man who appointed him, fool.
We all knew mission creep was going to occur.
Yeah, but you also think Carville was talking about Ken Starr when he said, "If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find.", even after being shown he was talking about Paula Jones. So you're not exactly playin' with a full deck -- if ya know what I mean.Hardly. You have a vivid imagination.Having lived thru Watergate, this is unfolding in much the same way.Wow, these right wingers are really running scared. They acted the same way under Nixon. Will Trump meet the same sticky end?
I also "lived through Watergate, and this is nothing like it."
In other words, you didn't quote Rosenstein. You're so fucking stupid that you don't even know you aren't quoting Rosenstein when you claim you are quoting Rosenstein.No you didn't, moron. You quoted some fake news "journalist" talking about what Mewler said.Mueller apparently doesn't even know what he authorized Mewler to investigate, if that's the case. However, notice that you didn't actually quote Mewler saying that.Huh?
It's called investigating things you are not tasked with.
Mueller is investigating Trump colluding with Putin to rig the 2016 election.
Period.
Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
"Rosenstein said Special Counsel Robert Mueller can investigate any crimes that he might discover within the scope of his probe, but the deputy attorney general would not discuss which individuals are the subject of their inquiry. The interview comes days after Trump said he believes it would be inappropriate for Mueller to dig into Trump family finances."
No, I quoted his boss and the man who appointed him, fool.
No, dope. I quoted a report citing Rosenstein's statements from a Sunday morning show. Jeebus you're dumb.
He didn't claim that either, you witless baboon.He doesn't claim that, moron. He claims they lied.BULLSHIT.You believe you have an understanding that you do not have. The matter was handled and resolved.
I have 30 years of experience with classified laws, regs and handling and dealing with classified. How many do you have?
Everything I pointed out is FACT...
It is a FACT Comey LIED in his defense of Hillary. As shown, his claim that Hillary was ignorant of the laws she broke is destroyed by her signature on official govt documents, her acknowledgement that she was properly trained and aware of all rules and regs.
You are a shameless Hillary ass-kisser who refuses to acknowledge the truth that Hillary violated laws countless times.
Dude, the very fact that you believe that you are more informed or capable than those who investigated and were privy to all of the classified details, only serves to make you look like a foolish idiot. Carry on.
He claims a conspiracy then?
Yep, that's better.
Droning on endlessly about a minor technical gaff is what witless baboons like you do.Yeah, but you also think Carville was talking about Ken Starr when he said, "If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find." Even after being shown he was talking about Paula Jones. So you're not exactly playin' with a full deck -- if ya know what I mean.Hardly. You have a vivid imagination.Having lived thru Watergate, this is unfolding in much the same way.Wow, these right wingers are really running scared. They acted the same way under Nixon. Will Trump meet the same sticky end?
I also "lived through Watergate, and this is nothing like it."
Mueller goes from soliciting Trump to be the FBI director to investigating him in a week?
Washington is hilarious.
He didn't claim that either, you witless baboon.He doesn't claim that, moron. He claims they lied.BULLSHIT.
I have 30 years of experience with classified laws, regs and handling and dealing with classified. How many do you have?
Everything I pointed out is FACT...
It is a FACT Comey LIED in his defense of Hillary. As shown, his claim that Hillary was ignorant of the laws she broke is destroyed by her signature on official govt documents, her acknowledgement that she was properly trained and aware of all rules and regs.
You are a shameless Hillary ass-kisser who refuses to acknowledge the truth that Hillary violated laws countless times.
Dude, the very fact that you believe that you are more informed or capable than those who investigated and were privy to all of the classified details, only serves to make you look like a foolish idiot. Carry on.
He claims a conspiracy then?
Yep, that's better.
So, Comey lying would not be a conspiracy?
What was the purpose of lying then?
In other words, you didn't quote Rosenstein. You're so fucking stupid that you don't even know you aren't quoting Rosenstein when you claim you are quoting Rosenstein.No you didn't, moron. You quoted some fake news "journalist" talking about what Mewler said.Mueller apparently doesn't even know what he authorized Mewler to investigate, if that's the case. However, notice that you didn't actually quote Mewler saying that.Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
"Rosenstein said Special Counsel Robert Mueller can investigate any crimes that he might discover within the scope of his probe, but the deputy attorney general would not discuss which individuals are the subject of their inquiry. The interview comes days after Trump said he believes it would be inappropriate for Mueller to dig into Trump family finances."
No, I quoted his boss and the man who appointed him, fool.
No, dope. I quoted a report citing Rosenstein's statements from a Sunday morning show. Jeebus you're dumb.
Perhaps, but you didn't.In other words, you didn't quote Rosenstein. You're so fucking stupid that you don't even know you aren't quoting Rosenstein when you claim you are quoting Rosenstein.No you didn't, moron. You quoted some fake news "journalist" talking about what Mewler said.Mueller apparently doesn't even know what he authorized Mewler to investigate, if that's the case. However, notice that you didn't actually quote Mewler saying that.
No, I quoted his boss and the man who appointed him, fool.
No, dope. I quoted a report citing Rosenstein's statements from a Sunday morning show. Jeebus you're dumb.
The article I posted quoted Rosenstein, moron.
Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
You're arguing that he was wrong. Either that means you know better than him or that he was lying.
Answer the question, dope.He didn't claim that either, you witless baboon.He doesn't claim that, moron. He claims they lied.Dude, the very fact that you believe that you are more informed or capable than those who investigated and were privy to all of the classified details, only serves to make you look like a foolish idiot. Carry on.
He claims a conspiracy then?
Yep, that's better.
So, Comey lying would not be a conspiracy?
What was the purpose of lying then?
Do you have an capacity for committing logic whatsoever?
Perhaps, but you didn't.In other words, you didn't quote Rosenstein. You're so fucking stupid that you don't even know you aren't quoting Rosenstein when you claim you are quoting Rosenstein.No you didn't, moron. You quoted some fake news "journalist" talking about what Mewler said.No, I quoted his boss and the man who appointed him, fool.
No, dope. I quoted a report citing Rosenstein's statements from a Sunday morning show. Jeebus you're dumb.
The article I posted quoted Rosenstein, moron.
Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
It's called following the money [emoji383]
Huh?
It's called investigating things you are not tasked with.
Mueller is investigating Trump colluding with Putin to rig the 2016 election.
Period.
Rosenstein: Special counsel Mueller can investigate any crimes he uncovers in Russia probe
"Rosenstein said Special Counsel Robert Mueller can investigate any crimes that he might discover within the scope of his probe, but the deputy attorney general would not discuss which individuals are the subject of their inquiry. The interview comes days after Trump said he believes it would be inappropriate for Mueller to dig into Trump family finances."
He didn't claim that either, you witless baboon.He doesn't claim that, moron. He claims they lied.Dude, the very fact that you believe that you are more informed or capable than those who investigated and were privy to all of the classified details, only serves to make you look like a foolish idiot. Carry on.
He claims a conspiracy then?
Yep, that's better.
So, Comey lying would not be a conspiracy?
What was the purpose of lying then?
Do you have an capacity for committing logic whatsoever?
And by "minor technical gaffe," you mean your usual mindless conservative drivel.Droning on endlessly about a minor technical gaff is what witless baboons like you do.Yeah, but you also think Carville was talking about Ken Starr when he said, "If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find." Even after being shown he was talking about Paula Jones. So you're not exactly playin' with a full deck -- if ya know what I mean.Hardly. You have a vivid imagination.Having lived thru Watergate, this is unfolding in much the same way.Wow, these right wingers are really running scared. They acted the same way under Nixon. Will Trump meet the same sticky end?
I also "lived through Watergate, and this is nothing like it."
You're arguing that he was wrong. Either that means you know better than him or that he was lying.
He WAS WRONG, you moron! He claimed Hillary was ignorant of the law despite her signatures on official government documents claiming she had received the training and was well aware of the laws she violated!
And you are too much of a smug, delusional snowflake to admit claiming something that is NOT true is also called 'LYING', which is what Comey did.
Bwuhahaha... you have no idea how much you are embarrassing yourself. I love it.
Bwuhahaha... you have no idea how much you are embarrassing yourself. I love it.
I don't always waste my time responding to obvious idiocies.Answer the question, dope.He didn't claim that either, you witless baboon.He doesn't claim that, moron. He claims they lied.
He claims a conspiracy then?
Yep, that's better.
So, Comey lying would not be a conspiracy?
What was the purpose of lying then?
Do you have an capacity for committing logic whatsoever?
Do you have the balls to?
Nixon's sin was ... unremarkably and unsurprisingly ... hubris. He literally had the belief that ANYTHING he did in the name of natl security was legal And that wasn't as outrageous as it seems. JFK did have people killed. LBJ was a best a willing participant in waylaying facts about the Bay of Pigs "incident." Nixon's problem was he came to see his reelection as an issue of natl security ... and that began months if not years before George McGovern became a household name.Having lived thru Watergate, this is unfolding in much the same way.Wow, these right wingers are really running scared. They acted the same way under Nixon. Will Trump meet the same sticky end?
Libya was already destabilized after the overthrow of Qaddafi. The violent protests had been ongoing long before the compound attack in Benghazi. This was during the Arab Spring at A time the president of Egypt had also been overthrown, and that young shop keeper in Morrocco set himself on fire in protest over the corruption of him being extorted for his profits. When some shit for brains fake bible thumper in California made a video of him burning a Koran because that's what fake shit for brains bible thumpers do. Notice the low file he has continued since? That's because he is a coward.Its what all shit for brains fake bible thumpers are. But then again these are the same people who scam elderly people out of their money on fake bible thumper tv shows, but I digress. That video was seen all over the Middle East and added fuel to the already out of control inferno. Two things happened after that. The lunatic fringe conservative right immediately went into damage control mode to defend a coward bible thumper, and the lunatic fringe conservative right propaganda machine turned it into another anti Clinton meme with a dose of the ongoing Obama Derangement Syndrome thrown in for good measure. And as with everything else that is the lunatic fringe conservative right, it has morphed into a full blown mental illness of which all of the hind, meth, and opioids cannot cure.
STOP THE BULLSHIT ALREADY.....
Libya was destabilized because Barak Obama aided and abetted the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11/01, killing 3,000 Americans. The 'rebels' Barry helped were the same TERRORISTS - Al Qaeda - who had for years been hiring jihadists from all over the world to go to Afghanistan and Iraq to kill US troops.
Obama dragged the US into the middle of a civil war between a nation's leader - who was helping the coalition fight AGAINST terrorists in Northern Africa - and terrorists, dragged the US into an UN-Constitutional, UN-approved war to help Al Qaeda / terrorists take over Libya.
During the investigations, one of the things that snowflakes claim did not come out was:
- The FBI testified there was NO - ZERO - evidence that the video played any part in the attack on the Benghazi compound on 9/11/12.
- The FBI testified there was NO - ZERO - evidence that there was EVER any evidence of a 'protest' before the attack. Witnesses on the ground said there was never any protest, that it was a terrorist attack from the very start.
- The Lead Ambassador in Tripoli testified that in less than an hour after the attack began he called the State Department and told HILLARY that this was a terrorist attack
- The FBI on the ground in Benghazi sent the State Department and the WH War Room a report declaring this to be a terrorist attack. (Also coming out of the investigations was the fact that this report was MODIFIED 13 times by the WH and State Department - every reference to 'terrorism' or a 'terrorist attack' being stripped from the report - before it was allowed to be released to the public!)
- The 2 TERRORIST attacks that were perpetrated against the compound in the weeks before the final terrorist attack on 9/11/12 were discussed - not once was any reference to the video, which was already out for some time. Experts described these ATTACKS as the enemy testing defenses in preparation for the final attack.
- It was revealed that 22 (TWENTY-TWO) US Embassies throughout the Middle East on 9/11/12, all part of a Middle East-wide terrorist attack that had been called for, which the Obama administration knew about and acknowledged. Of those 22 attacks called for and perpetrated on the anniversary of 9/11/01, 2 US facilities were overrun- the Cairo Embassy and the Benghazi compound. In all of those attacks only 4 Americans died - in Benghazi - due to the piss-poor precautions taken and decisions made. Out of all 22 attacks, ONLY THE BENGHAZI attack was claimed to be a protest over a video.
If you are going to try to declare what happened then get your facts straight. Otherwise you are just spreading BS!
