Why is Senator K. Harris (D-CA) Not the MAIN ISSUE in this Campaign?

Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.
....
A stat, not stats and a stat that shows women have a 5 point lead over men in college graduation.

A figure that has essentially zero to do with any contention that you made. :/
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.


The stats you posted were irrelevant to this discussion. And your weird obsession with my sex life is equally irrelevant.

AND, as I will explain again, you moron. My point about mention the name calling is that it shows that you have no argument. YOu are using personal attacks INSTEAD of an actual argument.


I asked you a question. If the "future is female", what happened to the men? Are they gone for some reason? Or just silent whipped curs?

You said it. NOw explain what it meant.

You sexist bigot.

 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.
....
A stat, not stats and a stat that shows women have a 5 point lead over men in college graduation.

A figure that has essentially zero to do with any contention that you made. :/


Sure...whatever you say slick.
 
As for the OP...I'm sure that they'll do more of it but I think Biden should be sending Harris around the nation non-stop. If blacks don't show up, if women don't show up....Biden will lose. As he's done twice before...LOL.


If she is such a rockstar, why would she not also get out the white and/or male vote?

Sounds more like a token, an obvious attempt to pander. To people stupid enough to fall for it.

Plenty of white men will vote for her. College educated whites--aka your betters--vote for democrats. Those digging the ditches like you vote for the guys who keep you in the ditch.


I'm sure plenty of stupid white men will vote for her.
She doesn't need your support. But thanks for the offer.
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.


The stats you posted were irrelevant to this discussion. And your weird obsession with my sex life is equally irrelevant.

AND, as I will explain again, you moron. My point about mention the name calling is that it shows that you have no argument. YOu are using personal attacks INSTEAD of an actual argument.


I asked you a question. If the "future is female", what happened to the men? Are they gone for some reason? Or just silent whipped curs?

You said it. NOw explain what it meant.

You sexist bigot.




So, the men are gone? That is your view of future? And you deny being a sexist bigot?


So, tell me what do you think of men who vote for Harris then? ARe they just to stupid too know that they are voting for their own extinction?
 
As for the OP...I'm sure that they'll do more of it but I think Biden should be sending Harris around the nation non-stop. If blacks don't show up, if women don't show up....Biden will lose. As he's done twice before...LOL.


If she is such a rockstar, why would she not also get out the white and/or male vote?

Sounds more like a token, an obvious attempt to pander. To people stupid enough to fall for it.

Plenty of white men will vote for her. College educated whites--aka your betters--vote for democrats. Those digging the ditches like you vote for the guys who keep you in the ditch.


I'm sure plenty of stupid white men will vote for her.
She doesn't need your support. But thanks for the offer.


Aw, how cute. YOu cut my post down to avoid my point, and made a little zinger, good for you.

My point stands, you stupid bigot.


But you are the one that made a point that she could get out the black and woman vote.


That's not what a rock star does. That is what a token does.


Your classism is noted. NOt only are you a sexist bigot, but a classist one too.
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.


The stats you posted were irrelevant to this discussion. And your weird obsession with my sex life is equally irrelevant.

AND, as I will explain again, you moron. My point about mention the name calling is that it shows that you have no argument. YOu are using personal attacks INSTEAD of an actual argument.


I asked you a question. If the "future is female", what happened to the men? Are they gone for some reason? Or just silent whipped curs?

You said it. NOw explain what it meant.

You sexist bigot.




So, the men are gone? That is your view of future? And you deny being a sexist bigot?


So, tell me what do you think of men who vote for Harris then? ARe they just to stupid too know that they are voting for their own extinction?


This is too funny.

The future is female
And she may have dark skin.

I say that again to set you spinning like a top into what you THINK it means.

Off you go.
 
As for the OP...I'm sure that they'll do more of it but I think Biden should be sending Harris around the nation non-stop. If blacks don't show up, if women don't show up....Biden will lose. As he's done twice before...LOL.


If she is such a rockstar, why would she not also get out the white and/or male vote?

Sounds more like a token, an obvious attempt to pander. To people stupid enough to fall for it.

Plenty of white men will vote for her. College educated whites--aka your betters--vote for democrats. Those digging the ditches like you vote for the guys who keep you in the ditch.


I'm sure plenty of stupid white men will vote for her.
She doesn't need your support. But thanks for the offer.


Aw, how cute. YOu cut my post down to avoid my point, and made a little zinger,

You're the owner of the little zinger.
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).


"The future is female" is a sexist anti-male statement.

You are an anti-male bigot.

Poor baby. :itsok::up_yours:


Nope. I'm fine. You are a bigot and an asshole.

You sound hurt.... Most INCELs sound like you.


No, I don't, I sound like I am calling you out on your anti-male sexism.

And your saying "incel" when I point out your sexism, is just more of your anti-male bigotry.

As with most INCELs, you hate women because women simply don't notice you.


It is insane that you assume that, based on my calling out your sexism.


Oh, I get it, this is just your standard asshole lib defense. When you lose an argument, change the topic to how the person that crushed you, is a bad person.


You can shove that shit back up the orifice you pulled it from, asshole.


My point stands. Stating that the "Future is Female" is a sexist statement and you are a sexist and an asshole.


To respond to this seriously and honestly, you would have to explain how it is NOT an sexist statement. (good luck with that)


Instead, you will keep trying to distract from my valid accusation, by making up false smears against me.


Because you are a coward, and an asshole, and a liberal.

Its based on your body of work wormless. That an INCEL like you hates women is obvious from your posts.


Bullshit. Nothing in my words indicates that.


That is just you, trying to distract from your sexism and bigotry, that I rightfully called you out on.


Why are you so full of hate and disdain for men?

The INCEL vote is part of Trump's base. You're exhibit A.

The future is female....and she may have brown skin. Good luck adjusting.

View attachment 386005

View attachment 386006

Get used to it.



Saying incel does not prove that you are not a sexist bigoted asshole.

Your standing by your claim that "the future is female", proves that you are.

You have made no attempt to explain how that statement is not sexist. Because you can't. And even someone as stupid and blind as yourself, can see that.


So, you attack me. Because it is all you have.


You sexist bigot.


So, if "the future is female" what happens to all the men? Are the gone? Or just oppressed second class citizens, because you now, reasons?

Actually I showed you stats peewee. You seem really bothered by women. Probably because you were never noticed by them...which is probably worse than being rejected.

View attachment 386016

PS: If you're worried about name calling...you fired the first shot.


The stats you posted were irrelevant to this discussion. And your weird obsession with my sex life is equally irrelevant.

AND, as I will explain again, you moron. My point about mention the name calling is that it shows that you have no argument. YOu are using personal attacks INSTEAD of an actual argument.


I asked you a question. If the "future is female", what happened to the men? Are they gone for some reason? Or just silent whipped curs?

You said it. NOw explain what it meant.

You sexist bigot.




So, the men are gone? That is your view of future? And you deny being a sexist bigot?


So, tell me what do you think of men who vote for Harris then? ARe they just to stupid too know that they are voting for their own extinction?


This is too funny.

The future is female
And she may have dark skin.

I say that again to set you spinning like a top into what you THINK it means.

Off you go.



I've asked you what it means, and your answer seems to indicate that you envision us men, being gone, replaced by dildos.


How is wanting men gone from society, not sexist and bigoted?


Do you imagine that women will just abort all male fetuses, or are you hoping for something more, pro-active?
 
As for the OP...I'm sure that they'll do more of it but I think Biden should be sending Harris around the nation non-stop. If blacks don't show up, if women don't show up....Biden will lose. As he's done twice before...LOL.


If she is such a rockstar, why would she not also get out the white and/or male vote?

Sounds more like a token, an obvious attempt to pander. To people stupid enough to fall for it.

Plenty of white men will vote for her. College educated whites--aka your betters--vote for democrats. Those digging the ditches like you vote for the guys who keep you in the ditch.


I'm sure plenty of stupid white men will vote for her.
She doesn't need your support. But thanks for the offer.


Aw, how cute. YOu cut my post down to avoid my point, and made a little zinger,

You're the owner of the little zinger.


You keep making it personal, in an attempt to dodge my point.


That you do that, is an admission that you cannot refute or even try to refute my point.


You know that Harris is only there as a token and a bullshit virtue signal. That is her role, not rock star.


Your continued refusal to serious discuss the issue, is an admission that you know that.
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL


What do you think it means, when feminist say, " The future if female"?
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL


What do you think it means, when feminist say, " The future if female"?
I'm not a mind reader. But I am pretty sure the gop shat in it own soup betting that "starve the beast" would result in the electorate not chosing to end our global military dominance to protect funding for medical care, retirement and education.
 
Trump is the MAIN ISSUE in this campaign
Well yeah... what else> Obviously they are not going to concentrate on Biden and Harris.
If Trump is loved, he will be re-elected.
If not, Biden is our President


It is weird the way you want to "love" your presidents.
Trump is not loved?

Go figure


The way he drives you libs nuts, by just not being the slightest bit intimidated by you?

There is a growing warmth I admit.

Beyond that, Presidents are people that work for US. We never meet them, we don't hang out, or take long walks together.


That you want to judge them on the level of love you have for them, is weird.

I'm also confused when leftists say, "Well, he only did that because he wants your vote!"

Yeah, and?

1) I don't really care WHY a politician does the right thing, so long as he does it.

2) I'm pretty sure that's kinda how the system is supposed to work. They don't do good things for the voters, they lose their jobs. So to keep their jobs, they please the voters. Wasn't that the entire point to our system of government, or did I miss something?

What kind of loonbag thinks we're supposed to waste time divining a politician's innermost thoughts and motivations, and only accept policies that do good things if the motives are sufficiently "pure"?


AND it is worth noting, they never hold their own politicians to such standards. Bill Clinton was obviously a sexual predatory who looked at women as objects, but his positions on "women's issues" were good, so he got a pass.

Part and parcel of the leftist "who cares about actions, as long as I think your intentions are pure" mindset.

I heard someone over the conventions, I forget who, gassing about Dementia Joe and "We don't need him to solve our problems, we just need him to understand them." Call me a cynical, callous conservative if you want, but what's the point of having a politician understand your problems if he's not going to use that understanding to solve them? If I want someone to care about me, that's what I have family and friends for. If that's not enough, I'll hire a therapist. What earthly good does it do me to think that some office-holding stranger is having warm fuzzies about me and my "plight", always assuming I'm dumb enough to believe that in the first place?
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL


What do you think it means, when feminist say, " The future if female"?
I'm not a mind reader. But I am pretty sure the gop shat in it own soup betting that "starve the beast" would result in the electorate not chosing to end our global military dominance to protect funding for medical care, retirement and education.


Unfunded entitlement programs have been a bipartisan problem, for decades.

Military spending not being reexamined since the end of the cold war, has been a bi-partisan problem for decades.


candycorn was pretty clear, she thinks it means no men at all.


What do you think of that? A valid policy position or indefensible sexism and bigotry?
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????
/——/ DemocRATs needed two throw-away candidates with zero chance of ever being elected president and VP. This clears the deck for viable candidates in 2024.

It's looking very much like what they needed was two vaguely plausible candidates they could destroy the entire election system over. I've been saying it ever since the Democrats made universal mail-in voting a primary focus: they're plotting to deliberately and cynically disenfranchise millions of their own voters as a means to overthrow the election system, if not huge chunks of the federal system in general.
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL


What do you think it means, when feminist say, " The future if female"?
I'm not a mind reader. But I am pretty sure the gop shat in it own soup betting that "starve the beast" would result in the electorate not chosing to end our global military dominance to protect funding for medical care, retirement and education.


Unfunded entitlement programs have been a bipartisan problem, for decades.

Military spending not being reexamined since the end of the cold war, has been a bi-partisan problem for decades.


candycorn was pretty clear, she thinks it means no men at all.


What do you think of that? A valid policy position or indefensible sexism and bigotry?
It's simply not true that both parties are equal in tax cuts and starving revenue. It's gop dogma from Norquist bastardizing Reagan right through the gop's latest round round in 2017 of stimulus for the 1%. Complainent that dems are somehow complitcit for not voting to cut social programs after the gop cuts taxes is bs. It's not an equivalency so don't try that shit.

I don't believe candy ever meant no men at all.
 
I don't see that its even debatable that women will increase their % in congress. The candidates running in both parties for congress today, shows 2018 was not an anomaly. W replaced O'Connor with Alito. That would be politically suicidal today, esp given other male, catholic, anti-choice scotus nominees. The gop's share of women will continue to decline, as older white women become less of the electorate overall … unless the gop changes.

It's maybe ironic that the two ancient white men running for potus have the backgrounds they do. Trump is simply off the charts of impropriety. Forget pussy grabbing … that's just the tip of the iceberg. (pun intended.) Biden seeks praise for violence against women act. With his support of C. Thomas, that's like John Kerry posing as the "wartime leader." BUT the dems most liberal and still plain spoken white male senator was Al Frankan, and we saw what happened to him over a not even funny sexist joke where he didn't even touch the woman. America's come a long way (good) but the reality is that men of my generation and even Kegger's have so much shit in their closets, that the America we will see in gender equity in even 20 years will probably make us look at Hillary and think "thank God she wasn't the first." LOL


What do you think it means, when feminist say, " The future if female"?
I'm not a mind reader. But I am pretty sure the gop shat in it own soup betting that "starve the beast" would result in the electorate not chosing to end our global military dominance to protect funding for medical care, retirement and education.


Unfunded entitlement programs have been a bipartisan problem, for decades.

Military spending not being reexamined since the end of the cold war, has been a bi-partisan problem for decades.


candycorn was pretty clear, she thinks it means no men at all.


What do you think of that? A valid policy position or indefensible sexism and bigotry?

Personally, I just find it confusing, given that leftists keep telling us that "female" is just a social construct and has no real, objective meaning at all.
 
Every day that passes by, it becomes more and more obvious that Biden will not finish a four-year term. He will either be dead or incapacitated, possibly even before Inauguration Day.

With that in mind, the Democrat party has put before us the most radical, leftist, socialist extremist in all of the United States congress, and NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT!!! And not only that, there is no indication whatsoever that she has any clue about any subject other than criminal justice - which is her background.

Are "we" being forced into silence because the identifies as a so-called, "Black person"?????

I'm actually impressed with Joe's vitality compared to what you and your reach-around-buddies post here constantly. You've lowered expectations of Biden so much that he looks better and better.

The future is female. And she may just have dark skin (i.e. Harris).

What I just heard: "I think Joe is mentally fine, because I want him to be and because he still makes more sense than I do!"

How can the future be "female"? I thought "male" and "female" were just social constructs that could apply to literally anyone who wanted to claim them?
 

Forum List

Back
Top