Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The numbers are no longer in your favor, that is what I know. Independents making a swing against libs.No genius, it was my reference point for public opinion, which you brought up.Poll numbers? That is your reference point for justice?
Save that bullshit you don't like the speed the courts run at to fucking bad it runs at the same speed for Democrats and Republicans I suspect you never gave a shit about judges Obama put on the court being partisan. So spare us all your phony outrage.There is a legal way to get that the House Democrats could have gone to the courts make their case and the judge rules if the WH has grounds to block these people from testifying. The Democrats instead chose to push ahead with impeachment and not go that route the reason why is simple this is and always has been about politics nothing more.The Senate Republicans are not doing anything the Hosue Democrats didn't do the only thing that is different is how the partisans react to it.
The Republicans complained - their chief complaint - NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.
The WH blocked testimony of those with first hand knowledge.
Now the Republicans have a chance to call them in.
But they won't.
Why?
Save that bullshit, had they gone to court it would have been drug out and you know that the flunkies Trump has put on the court would have covered his ass.
They complained there were no first hand accounts.
There are witnesses WITH first hand accounts.
Why won't they call them?
Are they afraid?
They won't call them because the House has the responsibility to uncover the facts, not the Senate. It is not fear, but standing up for the Constitution's separation of powers. The Executive branch is not subject to this type of hearing as upheld by the Supreme Court during the Obama Administration. Do your homework Coyote.
Trump stopped them from coming in, why?
Separation of powers. Presidents typically protect the office from Congressional over reach.
But he would, if they would exonerate him.trump does not need to call witnesses
Which they won't, so he wont.
This isn't rocket surgery, professor.
Save that bullshit you don't like the speed the courts run at to fucking bad it runs at the same speed for Democrats and Republicans I suspect you never gave a shit about judges Obama put on the court being partisan. So spare us all your phony outrage.There is a legal way to get that the House Democrats could have gone to the courts make their case and the judge rules if the WH has grounds to block these people from testifying. The Democrats instead chose to push ahead with impeachment and not go that route the reason why is simple this is and always has been about politics nothing more.The Senate Republicans are not doing anything the Hosue Democrats didn't do the only thing that is different is how the partisans react to it.
The Republicans complained - their chief complaint - NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.
The WH blocked testimony of those with first hand knowledge.
Now the Republicans have a chance to call them in.
But they won't.
Why?
Save that bullshit, had they gone to court it would have been drug out and you know that the flunkies Trump has put on the court would have covered his ass.
Remember the phrase elections have consquences dipshit? Remember who said it? Do you remember who made it possible for Trump to get so many judges confirmed when the Senate voted to change the number of votes needed for confirmation from 60 to a simple majority? The answers are Obama after his 2008 win and Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats in 2013.Save that bullshit you don't like the speed the courts run at to fucking bad it runs at the same speed for Democrats and Republicans I suspect you never gave a shit about judges Obama put on the court being partisan. So spare us all your phony outrage.There is a legal way to get that the House Democrats could have gone to the courts make their case and the judge rules if the WH has grounds to block these people from testifying. The Democrats instead chose to push ahead with impeachment and not go that route the reason why is simple this is and always has been about politics nothing more.The Senate Republicans are not doing anything the Hosue Democrats didn't do the only thing that is different is how the partisans react to it.
The Republicans complained - their chief complaint - NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.
The WH blocked testimony of those with first hand knowledge.
Now the Republicans have a chance to call them in.
But they won't.
Why?
Save that bullshit, had they gone to court it would have been drug out and you know that the flunkies Trump has put on the court would have covered his ass.
Come on Trump Humper you know why republicans are whining about the courts, because they are stacked in Trump's favor.
Because we don’t lynch! We are the good guys.. you guys are eh ones putting 77 year old men in jail to die because trump won.. your sickWas he going to get prosecuted?did his son Get prosecuted?Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.Will you charge Biden with bribery?LOLDo you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on
Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.
You have no fucking clue.
Why didn't the Republican House & Senate investigate?
Do you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
Because we don’t lynch! We are the good guys.. you guys are eh ones putting 77 year old men in jail to die because trump won.. your sickWas he going to get prosecuted?did his son Get prosecuted?Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.Will you charge Biden with bribery?LOL
Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.
You have no fucking clue.
Why didn't the Republican House & Senate investigate?
Lol says the back democrat haha you are insaneBecause we don’t lynch! We are the good guys.. you guys are eh ones putting 77 year old men in jail to die because trump won.. your sickWas he going to get prosecuted?did his son Get prosecuted?Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.Will you charge Biden with bribery?
You have no fucking clue.
Why didn't the Republican House & Senate investigate?
There is nothing good about you, he shouldn't have broke the law. You think because you are white you are above the law. So who is really sick.
Remember the phrase elections have consquences dipshit? Remember who said it? Do you remember who made it possible for Trump to get so many judges confirmed when the Senate voted to change the number of votes needed for confirmation from 60 to a simple majority? The answers are Obama after his 2008 win and Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats in 2013.Save that bullshit you don't like the speed the courts run at to fucking bad it runs at the same speed for Democrats and Republicans I suspect you never gave a shit about judges Obama put on the court being partisan. So spare us all your phony outrage.There is a legal way to get that the House Democrats could have gone to the courts make their case and the judge rules if the WH has grounds to block these people from testifying. The Democrats instead chose to push ahead with impeachment and not go that route the reason why is simple this is and always has been about politics nothing more.The Republicans complained - their chief complaint - NO FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.
The WH blocked testimony of those with first hand knowledge.
Now the Republicans have a chance to call them in.
But they won't.
Why?
Save that bullshit, had they gone to court it would have been drug out and you know that the flunkies Trump has put on the court would have covered his ass.
Come on Trump Humper you know why republicans are whining about the courts, because they are stacked in Trump's favor.
Do you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
Do you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
Do you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
Penny the Braintrust's Signature: "Ukrainegate is WORST than Watergate"
proving why Leftists believe what they believe
Trump released the transcriptBut he would, if they would exonerate him.trump does not need to call witnesses
Which they won't, so he wont.
This isn't rocket surgery, professor.
And Taylor, vinderman said it was accurate enjoyDo you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
And Taylor, vinderman said it was accurate enjoyDo you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
Yes they did about the phone call the transcript was accurate thank youAnd Taylor, vinderman said it was accurate enjoyDo you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
Taylor and Vindman spoke the truth.
Yes they did about the phone call the transcript was accurate thank youAnd Taylor, vinderman said it was accurate enjoyDo you need a link to the transcript?Go figure. It's hugely confusing.
The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.
So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.
Why not?
Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....
they are afraid of what it might reveal.
No and its a memo. tramp needs only to look in the mirror and see his accuser.
Taylor and Vindman spoke the truth.
