Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[whitehall]

Why didn't democrats call witnesses when they had the chance? The investigation is over. Now the Senate has to judge the case on the evidence presented (if that ever happens).

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Nancy Pelosi wants guarantees that there will be a conviction. She is not going to get any guarantee period.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If shes not afraid why is she sitting on them

To try to get an agreement to call witnesses. This is literally all over the news.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why didn't democrats call witnesses when they had the chance?

Uh....they did..lots of them...what a bizarre post...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

In America you can’t accuse someone of murder with no evidence,, this is why America things democrats are nazis ,, you are accusing a man with no evidence of wrong doing.. your sick

First of all...this is a political trial, not a criminal...

But furthermore, if there are 7 or 8 witnesses, including 2 or 3 personal admissions to that murder -- that will bring a grand jury indictment....

Now there have been cases where a person was convicted based on either no evidence or made up evidence by police or prosecutors....but Trumpers like yourself still call them guilty ...

Do you know how those who have been falsely convicted of something get released?? Evidence.....

View attachment 295720

Like you said....."this is a political trial, not a criminal"
Then you use a criminal trial as your reference?
priceless

I use criminal trial as a reference because you dic suckers keep whining about due process, facing accusers, blah blah...all shit relative to criminal trials...

So if that is truly important to you, stand on it....call witnesses that you feel will "OWN THE LIBS" or shut the fuck up

Why are you so focused on male oral sex? You and boot-edge-edge got a little something going on under the table we don't know about?

Because I know how fragile minded you idiots are

also, the extent that you morons bend the knee in your sycophancy for Trump -- it is definitely very fruity....almost cuckold like....

I also noticed you ain't explained to me how you morons can go from talking all this shit about all of the witnesses you were gonna call in a Senate trial -- to now being scared shit less to call Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, etc.....you can call Biden and his son too if you feel they will help exonerate trump....but you won't

You can call Adam Schiff, Pelosi, Pelosi's grandchildren, Obama's neighbors, anyone you like...if you think it will help exonerate Trump....but you won't

 

[Meister]

It falls under Obstruction of Justice,

Neat! What it also does is delineate obstruction of congress as a crime. Give it up dude, you're embarrassing yourself.

Get a law degree. They were deliberate with the wording for a reason.

That makes no sense whatsoever. All you have done is just whine that obstruction of congress is one variant of obstruction of justice. Which does not support your, by now, completely failed point that there is no law against obstruction of Congress. I obliterated that point with a minimum of effort.

Not buying it for a second.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not buying it for a second

Irrelevant. The law states what it states, regardless of your cultish beliefs.

 

[Meister]

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

In America you can’t accuse someone of murder with no evidence,, this is why America things democrats are nazis ,, you are accusing a man with no evidence of wrong doing.. your sick

First of all...this is a political trial, not a criminal...

But furthermore, if there are 7 or 8 witnesses, including 2 or 3 personal admissions to that murder -- that will bring a grand jury indictment....

Now there have been cases where a person was convicted based on either no evidence or made up evidence by police or prosecutors....but Trumpers like yourself still call them guilty ...

Do you know how those who have been falsely convicted of something get released?? Evidence.....

View attachment 295720

Like you said....."this is a political trial, not a criminal"
Then you use a criminal trial as your reference?
priceless

I use criminal trial as a reference because you dic suckers keep whining about due process, facing accusers, blah blah...all shit relative to criminal trials...

So if that is truly important to you, stand on it....call witnesses that you feel will "OWN THE LIBS" or shut the fuck up

Why are you so focused on male oral sex? You and boot-edge-edge got a little something going on under the table we don't know about?

Biff has surfer knees and doesn't surf.

He comes back like that because I called him out on his own post.

 

[Meister]

Not buying it for a second

Irrelevant. The law states what it states, regardless of your cultish beliefs.

The articles of impeachment that passed are so weak and didn't rise to the level the libs had hoped.....again. This time
they lost the support of the Independents in the polls. What the nex

Not buying it for a second

Irrelevant. The law states what it states, regardless of your cultish beliefs.

Yup, and they never could have nailed an Obstruction of Justice on him and they will lose the
obstruction of congress.

 

[Faun]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

The jury foreman doesn't brag about working closely with the defendant either.

There currently is no defendant. There is no trial. There is no jury. There is no impeachment.

There is only a Democrat roadshow, which may or may not appear at the Senate.

Impeachment is done.

 

[RealDave]

Why didn't democrats call witnesses when they had the chance? The investigation is over. Now the Senate has to judge the case on the evidence presented (if that ever happens).

They called. Trump said no.

 

[RealDave]

You honestly don't think that evidence was provided that proves Trump's intent was to hold aide and a meeting until an announcement of investigations into Biden was made?

Honestly?

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

Was he going to get prosecuted?

You have no fucking clue.

Why didn't the Republican House & Senate investigate?

 

[Mac-7]

In America you can’t accuse someone of murder with no evidence,, this is why America things democrats are nazis ,, you are accusing a man with no evidence of wrong doing.. your sick

First of all...this is a political trial, not a criminal...

But furthermore, if there are 7 or 8 witnesses, including 2 or 3 personal admissions to that murder -- that will bring a grand jury indictment....

Now there have been cases where a person was convicted based on either no evidence or made up evidence by police or prosecutors....but Trumpers like yourself still call them guilty ...

Do you know how those who have been falsely convicted of something get released?? Evidence.....

View attachment 295720

Like you said....."this is a political trial, not a criminal"
Then you use a criminal trial as your reference?
priceless

I use criminal trial as a reference because you dic suckers keep whining about due process, facing accusers, blah blah...all shit relative to criminal trials...

So if that is truly important to you, stand on it....call witnesses that you feel will "OWN THE LIBS" or shut the fuck up

Why are you so focused on male oral sex? You and boot-edge-edge got a little something going on under the table we don't know about?

Because I know how fragile minded you idiots are

also, the extent that you morons bend the knee in your sycophancy for Trump -- it is definitely very fruity....almost cuckold like....

I also noticed you ain't explained to me how you morons can go from talking all this shit about all of the witnesses you were gonna call in a Senate trial -- to now being scared shit less to call Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, etc.....you can call Biden and his son too if you feel they will help exonerate trump....but you won't

You can call Adam Schiff, Pelosi, Pelosi's grandchildren, Obama's neighbors, anyone you like...if you think it will help exonerate Trump....but you won't

You seem to have nothing but insults

trump does not need to call witnesses

you have to prove he did something wrong

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

The jury foreman doesn't brag about working closely with the defendant either.

There currently is no defendant. There is no trial. There is no jury. There is no impeachment.

There is only a Democrat roadshow, which may or may not appear at the Senate.

Impeachment is done.

Yes, but not as you think.

 

[Intolerant]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

Yes, I want the accused to produce all of the evidence and witnesses that HE CLAIMED and YOU CLAIMED would prove he didn't do what is alleged....

The reason why you don't mind that the GOP refuses to call any witnesses is because you know he did it.....yall are just a bunch of clowns....

I bet yo dumb ass still believes Iraq was behind 9/11 too....

Why do you use a black man as your Avatar

He’s a wigger mang.

 

[Coyote]

Go figure. It's hugely confusing.

The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.

So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.

Why not?

Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....

they are afraid of what it might reveal.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Go figure. It's hugely confusing.

The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.

So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.

Why not?

Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....

they are afraid of what it might reveal.

They didn't realize how badly the house would fail at proving their case. They don't need witnesses. The senate isn't just rehashing the house escapade. You people don't understand how this works. If they don't want to call witnesses they don't have to. Especially when they can easily see that they will just vote to dismiss this silly bunch of crap as soon as it hits the senate floor AND NANCY PELOSER KNOWS THIS.

The left was totally fine with a biased and unfair house impeachment hearing. But they are now crying like little babies now that they found out what's good for the goose will be good for the gander in the senate.

 

[RealDave]

Go figure. It's hugely confusing.

The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.

So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.

Why not?

Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....

they are afraid of what it might reveal.

They didn't realize how badly the house would fail at proving their case. They don't need witnesses. The senate isn't just rehashing the house escapade. You people don't understand how this works. If they don't want to call witnesses they don't have to. Especially when they can easily see that they will just vote to dismiss this silly bunch of crap as soon as it hits the senate floor AND NANCY PELOSER KNOWS THIS.

The left was totally fine with a biased and unfair house impeachment hearing. But they are now crying like little babies now that they found out what's good for the goose will be good for the gander in the senate.

So, all the Democrat evidence from all those witnesses is what they will base their judgement?

You know that is not true. They don't want witnesses because they will vote Trump instead of country like the America haters they are.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Go figure. It's hugely confusing.

The Republicans whined that there was no "first hand" testimony.

So their solution? Refuse to allow first hand testimony to be given.

Why not?

Either they are afraid of what it might reveal or....

they are afraid of what it might reveal.

They didn't realize how badly the house would fail at proving their case. They don't need witnesses. The senate isn't just rehashing the house escapade. You people don't understand how this works. If they don't want to call witnesses they don't have to. Especially when they can easily see that they will just vote to dismiss this silly bunch of crap as soon as it hits the senate floor AND NANCY PELOSER KNOWS THIS.

The left was totally fine with a biased and unfair house impeachment hearing. But they are now crying like little babies now that they found out what's good for the goose will be good for the gander in the senate.

So, all the Democrat evidence from all those witnesses is what they will base their judgement?

You know that is not true. They don't want witnesses because they will vote Trump instead of country like the America haters they are.

THAT IS THEIR JOB. It is not to continue the case. The trial is based on the HOUSE findings.

 

[saveliberty]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Why did Democrats limit to the point of exclusion Republican witnesses?

Why can't Democrats use a fair process to Impeach?

Why can't Democrats accept who won the 2016 presidential election?

Why doesn't the House recognize it was their job to uncover witnesses and have them testify?

Why does the House ignore a Supreme Court ruling that keeps the Executive and Legislative bodies separate by protecting executive advisers to the president from testifying in cases like this?

Why can't the Democrats follow simple well established rules of law and the Constitution?

I guess we just have to accept they're stupid and uninformed power hungry losers.