Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

102 pages of comments ago - I said....the GOP are afraid to call witnesses.....

and 102 pages later......I am still right.......
And I reminded you that trump does not need proof of his innocence

you have to prove him guilty

which dems failed to do before rushing to impeachment
 
Cool, the house impeached.....

The Senate voted to acquit....life goes on...

And for time eternal -- you trumpers can claim how wrong Trump was treated and blah blah....


but I think you trumpers will only sing that tune up and until Trump is no longer in power....after that, your Trump sycophancy ends.....have to make room for the next demagogue to worship....

I am pulling for the Duck Dynasty guy myself.....or maybe Ted Nugent...he does hate pretty good
We (trumpsters) will complain about how the left tried to engineer a coup and nullify our 2016 vote
LOL

Oh? How'd we do that?
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
 
You haven't seen Trump hit back yet. This time next year you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who will admit to belonging to the traitorous, money laundering, human trafficking, pedophile, Stalinist democrat Party
Liberals are praying to whatever graven image passes for their god that trump does not win reelection in 2020

if he does retribution will be swift and heavy
Oh? What will this retribution entail?
Hopefully he will bring rogue agents in the Deep State to justice
"Deep state" being career politicians in Washington?
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
 
Liberals are praying to whatever graven image passes for their god that trump does not win reelection in 2020

if he does retribution will be swift and heavy
Oh? What will this retribution entail?
Hopefully he will bring rogue agents in the Deep State to justice
"Deep state" being career politicians in Washington?
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
Why not?

do you think they are saints?

if so you better wake up
 
We (trumpsters) will complain about how the left tried to engineer a coup and nullify our 2016 vote
LOL

Oh? How'd we do that?
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
 
Oh? What will this retribution entail?
Hopefully he will bring rogue agents in the Deep State to justice
"Deep state" being career politicians in Washington?
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
Why not?

do you think they are saints?

if so you better wake up
Not saying they're saints, they'revlike any law enforcement. I'm just not falling for that deep state nonsense. I thought when you said rogue agents, you were talking about FBI.
 
LOL

Oh? How'd we do that?
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
 
Hopefully he will bring rogue agents in the Deep State to justice
"Deep state" being career politicians in Washington?
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
Why not?

do you think they are saints?

if so you better wake up
Not saying they're saints, they'revlike any law enforcement. I'm just not falling for that deep state nonsense. I thought when you said rogue agents, you were talking about FBI.


Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'
The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.


"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.”


that sounds like a description of the Deep State to me
 
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
You may prefer to look the other way but I dont

Corruption goes on in Washington because no one is ever held acountable
 
"Deep state" being career politicians in Washington?
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
Why not?

do you think they are saints?

if so you better wake up
Not saying they're saints, they'revlike any law enforcement. I'm just not falling for that deep state nonsense. I thought when you said rogue agents, you were talking about FBI.


Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'
The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.


"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.”


that sounds like a description of the Deep State to me
And he proved to be wrong.
 
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
You may prefer to look the other way but I dont

Corruption goes on in Washington because no one is ever held acountable
LOLOL

You say that as you pull for the Senate to not hold Impeached Trump accountable for soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.
 
Cool, for that nonsense to get through every court in the land would have only taken us deep into 2020 and possibly deep into 2021.

Sorry man, TOO LATE.

That's not McConnell's problem. The failure on the part of the House does not constitute an emergency on his.
Only option is the Senate equivalent of a directed verdict of not guilty, the House failed to present a case. Thank the wisdom of the Founding Fathers to set a high bar in the Senate so that a reed slim majority of Jihadists couldn't remove the President from office
Cool, the house impeached.....

The Senate voted to acquit....life goes on...

And for time eternal -- you trumpers can claim how wrong Trump was treated and blah blah....


but I think you trumpers will only sing that tune up and until Trump is no longer in power....after that, your Trump sycophancy ends.....have to make room for the next demagogue to worship....

I am pulling for the Duck Dynasty guy myself.....or maybe Ted Nugent...he does hate pretty good
You haven't seen Trump hit back yet. This time next year you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who will admit to belonging to the traitorous, money laundering, human trafficking, pedophile, Stalinist democrat Party


The D's didn't even touch the President in this Fake Impeachment. Trump doesn't have to hit back on this, unless he wants to.


I thought for sure that the Dems would have had some fool come forward and testify in no uncertain terms about a fake conversation they had with the President. Something which would NEED to be rebutted. But really there is nothing but a group of butthurt deep staters whining about have no influence at all in foreign policy
Trump fucked them by releasing the transcript, they never thought he'd do that. Instead of stopping, the Stalinist democrats decided to double down on a losing bet
 
Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
You may prefer to look the other way but I dont

Corruption goes on in Washington because no one is ever held acountable
LOLOL

You say that as you pull for the Senate to not hold Impeached Trump accountable for soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.
The best thing to come out of this is the exposure of how Soros and his democrat Party turned foreign aid into the worlds biggest money laundering Operation. Biden, Pelosi, Kerry, Romney and other career politicians are all up to their ears in it. This is going to make a FANTASTIC commercial for Trump 2020
 
No

unelected career swamp rats who answer to no one - except maybe a bigger rat
You mean like FBI?
Why not?

do you think they are saints?

if so you better wake up
Not saying they're saints, they'revlike any law enforcement. I'm just not falling for that deep state nonsense. I thought when you said rogue agents, you were talking about FBI.



Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'
The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.


"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.”


that sounds like a description of the Deep State to me
And he proved to be wrong.


No

schumer was having a rare lucid and truthful moment
 
Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
You may prefer to look the other way but I dont

Corruption goes on in Washington because no one is ever held acountable
LOLOL

You say that as you pull for the Senate to not hold Impeached Trump accountable for soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.
The senate will consider any evidence the dem presenters offer

but the investigation is over
 
It's called negotiating...something that EVERY SINGLE PRESIDENT SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON HAS DONE!!! DUH?
LOL

And by "negotiating," you mean withholding financial aid to get him to investigate a political rival.

I mean asking the President of the Ukraine to investigate corruption! Why is that improper? It's done all the time.

What's laughable is listening to them try to make the case that Trump is violating the emoluments clause by having a summit meeting at Doral...a property that he owns! What part of the offer was to do that AT COST didn't they get? Trump offers to give the taxpayers a break by having it at a property he owns but because it's Trump...those liberal mouthpieces in the media immediately declare that it's a violation of the emoluments clause! News flash for you clueless wonders...when you do something "at cost" it means you're not taking a profit while doing it!!!!! Duh?
Show me another president running for re-election asking for a foreign leader to investigate another candidate who's also running for president....

Show me another candidate that was using his office to enrich his family like Joe Biden was! :)
Translation: you can't name anyone other than Impeached Trump. :mm:

As far as Biden, you have zero proof Joe used to office to enrich his family. What else would a lying con tool say though, right?
Uhh, there is the same kind of "proof" you guys use to claim Trump tried to use Ukraine to benefit himself. There is, for example, no way that Biden's son could have gotten that very lucrative job if Biden was not VP.
 
Last edited:
Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
You may prefer to look the other way but I dont

Corruption goes on in Washington because no one is ever held acountable
LOLOL

You say that as you pull for the Senate to not hold Impeached Trump accountable for soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.
Biden was far more corrupt than Burisma and if he has nothing to hide he should release all his Ukrainian emails and testify, right?
 
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?
Do you think the statute of limitations has expired on the bidens?
It's not about statute of limitations. It's about there's no corruption there for Ukraine to look for. All the players are either gone or cleared. If the purpose is to clean up corruption, shouldn't Impeached Trump have asked them to look into ongoing corruption? Not events that occurred nearly 4 years ago and have since been settled?
Riiiiight, because laundering taxpayer money through Burisma isnt a crime
 
I mean asking the President of the Ukraine to investigate corruption! Why is that improper? It's done all the time.

What's laughable is listening to them try to make the case that Trump is violating the emoluments clause by having a summit meeting at Doral...a property that he owns! What part of the offer was to do that AT COST didn't they get? Trump offers to give the taxpayers a break by having it at a property he owns but because it's Trump...those liberal mouthpieces in the media immediately declare that it's a violation of the emoluments clause! News flash for you clueless wonders...when you do something "at cost" it means you're not taking a profit while doing it!!!!! Duh?
Show me another president running for re-election asking for a foreign leader to investigate another candidate who's also running for president....

Show me another candidate that was using his office to enrich his family like Joe Biden was! :)
Translation: you can't name anyone other than Impeached Trump. :mm:

As far as Biden, you have zero proof Joe used to office to enrich his family. What else would a lying con tool say though, right?

Yeah, Joe had nothing to do with Hunter making all that money doing a job he no clue how to do! You keep telling yourself that, Faun!
Prove Joe did something to get him that job....

You really think someone with zero experience with either the Ukraine or the natural gas industry...someone with a history of drug abuse...get's hired at that pay rate for that job if his father ISN'T the Vice President?

IT'S PATENTLY OBVIOUS WHY HUNTER BIDEN GOT THAT JOB!
 
We (trumpsters) will complain about how the left tried to engineer a coup and nullify our 2016 vote
LOL

Oh? How'd we do that?
Through the phony mueller witch-hunt and now through impeachment based on rumors
The "Mueller witch-hunt??" That wasn't the left.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed special counsel by a Republican assistant Attorney General who was filling in for the Republican Attorney General who recused himself; who was appointed by a Republican president.

All the left did was sit back and enjoy the popcorn as we watched the show.

As far as the impeachment, Impeached Trump broke the law by soliciting a foreign national to help him with his campaign by looking for dirt with a political rival. That's not a rumor -- we have the White House memorandum.

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ..." ~ Impeached Trump


Actually, that's just a spin-job on what happened. President Trump was looking to eliminate corruption, the fact the Sleepy Joe and his son may have been caught up in corruption wasn't something that influenced him in the slightest and there is no proof that it did.
Oh? Sleepy Joe is no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer Ukraine's president an Zlochevsky's investigation was settled and closed.

So exactly what "corruption" was Impeached Trump asking the current president of Ukraine to look for?

So if the corruption happened yesterday but isn't happening now it shouldn't be looked at? That's an amazing take on things, Faun! You don't deny it looks sleazy as hell...but you think it's OK because it's not happening now?
 

Forum List

Back
Top