Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
There is the reason for the liberal objection.
so why?
is it because u dont want them to better themselves?
you all care as much about their drug habbit as they do!
I seriously dont understand the justification to be against that
Why do you advocate increasing the power and scope of govt. when your party claims to be against such?
Why should someone who uses drugs be ineligible for welfare?
They need different help, not welfare, we as a society should not enable these victims.
Who says they need help?
Maybe they like to do recreational drugs because it makes them feel better.
Why should they be ineligible for welfare?
Guess you're pretty lucky then. If people can refuse to take the test, then why do most businesses then refuse to hire them because of it? How do they get away with it if it's not lawful? Seems that would be discrimination and they could sue for that.....explain how they get away with it.
Far as I'm concerned they can't get away with it. All I know is I refused to play that game.
Do they really refuse to hire on that basis? Or are they dealing with a bunch of sheep too docile to stand up to tyranny? I don't know myself, I just flatly refuse to do it, and as far as possible I don't shop at places of business that trumpet "we drug test employees" on their front door either.
The question really isn't "can they get away with it". The question is, why would anyone give in? The fact is if everybody refused to submit, they will back down. Have some backbone and try it. Because giving in is selling the rest of us out.
that is the most ignorant thing I have seen u write. a business not wanting bunch of druggies is not tyranny, it is smart.
wtf is wrong with u people? the OP got yall grasping at straws! LOL
I am not Burmese. Did you get drug tested before posting that?
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
The premise is inoperative.
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
There is the reason for the liberal objection.
And that ^^ is a strawman constructed by intellects too weak to process information.
The Liberal believes that pinning a citizen down and extracting bodily fluids is sliiiiiiiiiiightly over the line of reasonable search and seizure. That means ANY citizen.
Authoritarian sycophants can only stand by and murmur "when they came for my blood I said nothing..." because that's what you're made of.
Wimp.
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
The premise is inoperative.
There is the reason for the liberal objection.
And that ^^ is a strawman constructed by intellects too weak to process information.
The Liberal believes that pinning a citizen down and extracting bodily fluids is sliiiiiiiiiiightly over the line of reasonable search and seizure. That means ANY citizen.
Authoritarian sycophants can only stand by and murmur "when they came for my blood I said nothing..." because that's what you're made of.
Wimp.
No one is pinned down. It is a choice, I want a job, I take a test, I want welfare, I take a test.
You seem to be the wimp, you refuse to answer lots questions. Now is when you will plead ignorant as to what questions, so carry on.
The premise is inoperative.
And that ^^ is a strawman constructed by intellects too weak to process information.
The Liberal believes that pinning a citizen down and extracting bodily fluids is sliiiiiiiiiiightly over the line of reasonable search and seizure. That means ANY citizen.
Authoritarian sycophants can only stand by and murmur "when they came for my blood I said nothing..." because that's what you're made of.
Wimp.
No one is pinned down. It is a choice, I want a job, I take a test, I want welfare, I take a test.
You seem to be the wimp, you refuse to answer lots questions. Now is when you will plead ignorant as to what questions, so carry on.
I just posted four or five answers in a row. You don't have the guts to handle them.
I refused to succumb to the corporatist invasion of my privacy. I worked self employed for 25 years.
I think only those who have a drug problem should be tested not those who don't.
Just because someone is on welfare doesn't mean they're a druggie.
Despite what the masses think there are people on welfare who really need it.
Ok...how many do you think will admit they have a drug problem? How do you know if they're not tested?
And of course everyone knows just because someone is on welfare it doesn't mean they're druggies....but testing would rule it out.
And...the "masses" know there are many people out there that really need it. But if you're applying for a job, you are going to be drug tested. Why shouldn't someone applying for free money and food also have to be tested?
If we can drug test people being paid to perform work, provide a service, etc., it seems to me people being provided taxpayers' money should be held to similar testing.
Ah, but can't risk turning off busted freeloaders come election time.
There is the reason for the liberal objection.
I think only those who have a drug problem should be tested not those who don't.
Just because someone is on welfare doesn't mean they're a druggie.
Despite what the masses think there are people on welfare who really need it.
Ok...how many do you think will admit they have a drug problem? How do you know if they're not tested?
And of course everyone knows just because someone is on welfare it doesn't mean they're druggies....but testing would rule it out.
And...the "masses" know there are many people out there that really need it. But if you're applying for a job, you are going to be drug tested. Why shouldn't someone applying for free money and food also have to be tested?
Fuck the government, and fuck you and your "conservative" friends. You have no right to search my bloodstream or anyone else's without a warrant.
You're just another Republican authoritarian freak.
Far as I'm concerned they can't get away with it. All I know is I refused to play that game.
Do they really refuse to hire on that basis? Or are they dealing with a bunch of sheep too docile to stand up to tyranny? I don't know myself, I just flatly refuse to do it, and as far as possible I don't shop at places of business that trumpet "we drug test employees" on their front door either.
The question really isn't "can they get away with it". The question is, why would anyone give in? The fact is if everybody refused to submit, they will back down. Have some backbone and try it. Because giving in is selling the rest of us out.
that is the most ignorant thing I have seen u write. a business not wanting bunch of druggies is not tyranny, it is smart.
wtf is wrong with u people? the OP got yall grasping at straws! LOL
You've deliberately (?) misrepresented the question.
The question is NOT "does a company want a bunch of druggies". The question is "does a government/employer have the right to your bodily fluids?". Interesting that you have to change the question in order to get the answer you want, innit? I find it fascinating myself.
Grasping at straws? You can't even spell out the word "you"
Come up with an answer to the actual question, and we'll get somewhere.
so why?
is it because u dont want them to better themselves?
you all care as much about their drug habbit as they do!
I seriously dont understand the justification to be against that
I'm not sure exactly what the OP means by the word, "welfare', but I do know that liberals do not want innocent children who are unfortunate to have been born to drug addicted parents to go homeless and hungry, if we can do anything about it.
