Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. That's not a Ukraine report.What Ukraine report?Trump can argue anything he wants in court when he challenges the subpoenas. The courts can rule against him. Dimwingers didn't wait on the court to rule. That's on them.the obstruction in the Mueller report that congress must have to proceed, is being obstructed through his constant denial of subpoenas and everything congress asks for....
Trump's argument in these cases is
THAT HE IS ABOVE ALL LAWS AND ABOVE CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS OF ANY KIND.....
it's a joke of an argument and completely unconstitutional... so far every court including the 3 man appeals court and the full appeals court have ruled against him and look at their argument as an absolute JOKE.... his argument, is the Constitution is wrong to designate 3 equal branches of govt, he wants to be and IS KING.
NOT an argument at all.... AND AGAIN spits in to the face of the Constitution.
THUS his obstruction on that too.... if it were a legit argument that was working through the courts, you'd have a point...
But this BS of his, is just a laughable excuse and stall tactic...
plus there is precedent that HE DOES have to turn over documents and does have to let McGahn testify
The fact they didn't want to wait on rulings doesn't make it obstruction.
Wake the fuck up.
concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information,
Trump just redacted the living shit out of the Ukraine report.
WAKE THE FUCK UP !
today --
Trump administration resists Ukraine disclosures ordered by court – Center for Public Integrity
Congressional obstruction
Trump administration resists Ukraine disclosures ordered by court – Center for Public Integrity
2. That isn't Congress requesting the docs.
3. The sham impeachment charges mention nothing about this FOIA request by this private group who has no bearing on impeachment.
Damn son, I'm gonna go get some things done outside and give you a chance to regroup. You really look foolish.
The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.
And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.
And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.
Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.
Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict TrumpAnd what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.
Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.
no he didn't.And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.
Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.
Defending himself from what? Oversight?He defended himself. You're not supposed to do that when democrats come after you.How did Trump obstruct congress?“Wanting” to do something is not the same as “attempting” to do something.
Lots of obstruction of justice is unsuccessful attempts, but it’s still a crime.
So tell me again, didn’t Trump attempt to fire Mueller?
He attempted but failed?
Like a missed field goal?
What the fuck does that even mean? He had authority to fire Comey and that isn’t obstruction of the investigation. Comey wasn’t conducting the investigation unilaterally.
There is so much fucking wrong with saying that “attempting” to fire Comey is an impeachable obstruction offense that it’s frankly retarded in the pejorative sense of the word.
pssssssstttttttt -
your bullshit wont make the obstruction article go away.
but it does make you a dumbass.
do carry on -
Sorry, but if you didn't want oversight, you shouldn't taken a position in government.
Something you and the rest of your crayon eating Dimwingers lack.1. That's not a Ukraine report.What Ukraine report?Trump can argue anything he wants in court when he challenges the subpoenas. The courts can rule against him. Dimwingers didn't wait on the court to rule. That's on them.
The fact they didn't want to wait on rulings doesn't make it obstruction.
Wake the fuck up.
concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information,
Trump just redacted the living shit out of the Ukraine report.
WAKE THE FUCK UP !
today --
Trump administration resists Ukraine disclosures ordered by court – Center for Public Integrity
Congressional obstruction
Trump administration resists Ukraine disclosures ordered by court – Center for Public Integrity
2. That isn't Congress requesting the docs.
3. The sham impeachment charges mention nothing about this FOIA request by this private group who has no bearing on impeachment.
Damn son, I'm gonna go get some things done outside and give you a chance to regroup. You really look foolish.
evidence u dipshit.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Clinton's impeachment was a sham.Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
Clinton saw major gains in the house after he was impeached. Your reasoning doesn't match history.
Jaywalking too?Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
So if they know it won’t get through the Senate, why are they doing the abuse of power and jaywalking BULLSHIT?
It will be a true and accurate claim.Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
So if they know it won’t get through the Senate, why are they doing the abuse of power and jaywalking BULLSHIT?
The Democrats believe that after the Senate squashes their genitals, they can claim that the "facts" of their case remain correct, and that the only reason Trump was acquitted is because the Republicans have greater numbers in the Senate. It's all they'll have toward the election at that point, and their hope is that it will be enough.
Ironically, it's the same reason he was (they expect) impeached in the House, with greater Democrat numbers. Funny, that.
It will be a true and accurate claim.Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
So if they know it won’t get through the Senate, why are they doing the abuse of power and jaywalking BULLSHIT?
The Democrats believe that after the Senate squashes their genitals, they can claim that the "facts" of their case remain correct, and that the only reason Trump was acquitted is because the Republicans have greater numbers in the Senate. It's all they'll have toward the election at that point, and their hope is that it will be enough.
Ironically, it's the same reason he was (they expect) impeached in the House, with greater Democrat numbers. Funny, that.
There is no lack of evidence.It will be a true and accurate claim.Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?
That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??
Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
So if they know it won’t get through the Senate, why are they doing the abuse of power and jaywalking BULLSHIT?
The Democrats believe that after the Senate squashes their genitals, they can claim that the "facts" of their case remain correct, and that the only reason Trump was acquitted is because the Republicans have greater numbers in the Senate. It's all they'll have toward the election at that point, and their hope is that it will be enough.
Ironically, it's the same reason he was (they expect) impeached in the House, with greater Democrat numbers. Funny, that.
Nope. They will leave out the part about lack of evidence.
There is no lack of evidence.It will be a true and accurate claim.Simple. They know the senate republicans are owned by tRump, and they will not remove him. I'd actually say we probably won't even see a trial, just a summary dismissal of the case.
If that likely event is followed by the unlikely event of a reelection there is a good or even better chance we Democrats will have a majority in both houses, and we still have impeachment bullets left.
So if they know it won’t get through the Senate, why are they doing the abuse of power and jaywalking BULLSHIT?
The Democrats believe that after the Senate squashes their genitals, they can claim that the "facts" of their case remain correct, and that the only reason Trump was acquitted is because the Republicans have greater numbers in the Senate. It's all they'll have toward the election at that point, and their hope is that it will be enough.
Ironically, it's the same reason he was (they expect) impeached in the House, with greater Democrat numbers. Funny, that.
Nope. They will leave out the part about lack of evidence.
Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for.
How did Trump obstruct congress?Trump might have wanted to fire him but he didn't so Mueller completed his work end of story. Wanting to do something does not make you guilty of it.Trump attempted to fire him, didn’t he?
“Wanting” to do something is not the same as “attempting” to do something.
Lots of obstruction of justice is unsuccessful attempts, but it’s still a crime.
So tell me again, didn’t Trump attempt to fire Mueller?
He attempted but failed?
Like a missed field goal?
What the fuck does that even mean? He had authority to fire Comey and that isn’t obstruction of the investigation. Comey wasn’t conducting the investigation unilaterally.
There is so much fucking wrong with saying that “attempting” to fire Comey is an impeachable obstruction offense that it’s frankly retarded in the pejorative sense of the word.
pssssssstttttttt -
your bullshit wont make the obstruction article go away.
but it does make you a dumbass.
do carry on -
Many other administrations have ignored subpoenas and blocked witnessess from testifying and the answer to that is take it to the courts which is what was done in the past instances.the blanket refusal to honor subpoenas for the impeachment investigations, and blanket refusal to allow first handsubpoenas testify or even show up.... there is no such thing as blanket immunity for his admin....How did Trump obstruct congress?“Wanting” to do something is not the same as “attempting” to do something.
Lots of obstruction of justice is unsuccessful attempts, but it’s still a crime.
So tell me again, didn’t Trump attempt to fire Mueller?
He attempted but failed?
Like a missed field goal?
What the fuck does that even mean? He had authority to fire Comey and that isn’t obstruction of the investigation. Comey wasn’t conducting the investigation unilaterally.
There is so much fucking wrong with saying that “attempting” to fire Comey is an impeachable obstruction offense that it’s frankly retarded in the pejorative sense of the word.
pssssssstttttttt -
your bullshit wont make the obstruction article go away.
but it does make you a dumbass.
do carry on -
None of that was my opinion. They challenged the subpoenas in court, and Schifferbrains didn't want to wait on the court rulings. Fact.Challenging subpoenas in court isn't obstruction, it is how our system works. Dimwingers couldn't wait on the courts because this is about the election.the blanket refusal to honor subpoenas for the impeachment investigations, and blanket refusal to allow first hand witnesses testify or even show up.... there is no such thing as blanket immunity for his admin....How did Trump obstruct congress?pssssssstttttttt -
Why did they go to you?
your bullshit wont make the obstruction article go away.
but it does make you a dumbass.
do carry on -
oh and the refusal to send the whistleblower complaint to congress as REQUIRED by law, and trying to cover up his crimes
The whistleblower didn't go to Trump, dumbass. He went to, and conspired with, Schifferbrains.
No crimes, Dumbass.
in your opinion ^^^^^^
which is f'n worthless.
see how that works ..........
The whistleblower didn't go to Trump, he went to Schifferbrains. More facts.
