Why isn’t obstruction of the Mueller investigation included in the articles of impeachment?

[Lesh]

Aren't we at the point in time when we realize that the Mueller Investigation was bullshit?

Nope. You obviously haven't read it

 

[Lesh]

While Mueller couldn’t find actual coordination with the Russians he did find that Trump not only knew what the Russians were doing but willingly accepted it and even strategized around it.

Stone however WAS in contact with Assange who was in contact with the Russians so...

 

[lantern2814]

The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?

That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??

Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?

The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!

So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?

Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.

And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?

Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.

there is no article for obstructing muellers investigation u f'n idiot -

DDDUUUUURRRRRRR

Hey stupid, try learning how to read. The moron Eddie states Mueller was obstructed. Mueller himself said he was not. Now STFU moron.

 

[lantern2814]

The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?

That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??

Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?

The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!

So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?

Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.

And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?

Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.

Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump

https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › donald-trump › did-mueller-mean-tr...
Jul 24, 2019 - The special counsel's report said he never came to a determination about ... Mueller says a president can be charged with obstruction after ...

Wrong again. Mueller himself said NO obstructions. And witnesses all heard the senile one say that the ability to indict or not had ZERO to do with the decisions. NBC news? Hahahahahah! Try again, you’re still at .000.

 

[lantern2814]

The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?

That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??

Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?

The obstruction which Trump committed during the Mueller investigation is way too complicated for the tards to grasp. I mean, look at the impossible time they are having just seeing Trump abusing his power for personal political gain!

So what's the point of trying to get them to see the even worse, but more complex, crimes Trump committed?

Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for. Try again eternal loser. Since Trump committed no crimes and you have ZERO evidence of any of your bullshit, STFU.

And what of 10 examples of obstruction shithead?

Again you illiterate fuckwad, Mueller himself stated under oath he was never interfered with and never obstructed. So you’re saying he lied? That means his entire report must be discarded. Try again loser. You’re still batting .000.

no he didn't.

Trump refused to be questioned in person, over and over and over again... for about a year and a half, Trump interfered and delayed the investigation... he finally settled on answering questions in writing by his lawyers, and 30 plus of those questions he avoided answering by claiming. I CAN NOT RECALL.

Yes he did you f’n LIAR. You get dumber by the day. Mueller was asked point blank if was impeded or obstructed. He said NO to both. So STFU.

 

[Terri4Trump]

The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?

That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??

Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?

Trump never obstructed the Muller investigation.

 

[lantern2814]

Hey retard, time to bitch slap you again. Mueller stated UNDER OATH that he was NEVER obstructed, NEVER interfered with and got everything asked for.

Absolutely false.

He never got an interview with Trump and even the written responses were unanswered or responded to with "I don't recall".

Then move on to the financials he never got...

Lush weighs in with the usual Dim lie. Asked point blank about obstruction, your senile Mueller stated there was NONE. They got everything they wanted, so you and the other lying Dims can GFY.

 

[edward37]

Stick it lantern where the sun don't shine
Search Results
Web results
What the Mueller Report Says About Obstruction - FactCheck ...

https://www.factcheck.org › 2019/04 › what-the-mueller-report-says-about...
Apr 18, 2019 - Mueller emphasized, however, that his analysis of the evidence did not clear the president of obstruction. Said Mueller: “f we had confidence ...

Mueller testimony: Trump not exonerated from obstruction of ...

https://www.vox.com › mueller-testimony-obstruction-justice-trump-nadler
Jul 24, 2019 - Jerry Nadler (D-NY), the House Judiciary Committee chair, got the special counsel to say that right at the beginning. ... Jerry Nadler (D-NY) prompted special counsel Robert Mueller to knock down President Donald Trump’s main talking points about “no obstruction.”

 

[Lesh]

Wrong again. Mueller himself said NO obstructions. And witnesses all heard the senile one say that the ability to indict or not had ZERO to do with the decisions. NBC news? Hahahahahah! Try again, you’re still at .000.

NONE of that is true. While Mueller said that his investigation was not "obstructed" in terms of shutting it down or trying to control the direction they took...

Trump refused an interview. That's obstruction

Trump refused to answer a large number of the questions in the written questionnaire. Also obstruction

Mueller found TEN instances of Obstruction and detailed them.

And most importantly Mueller made a POINT of saying that the DOJ rule stating that a President can't be indicted bore HEAVILY on his decision not to recommend charges

 

[ColonelAngus]

The Dimms said they had enough to impeach him for Obstruction of Justice for interfering with the Muller investigation.....so if that is TRUE, why wasn’t it added to the articles of impeachment?

That obstruction stuff wasn’t just BULLSHIT, WAS IT??

Shouldn’t all crimes be included in any impeachment proceedings?

Trump never obstructed the Muller investigation.

Exactly. My point, the Dimms were lying.

 

[lantern2814]

Wrong again. Mueller himself said NO obstructions. And witnesses all heard the senile one say that the ability to indict or not had ZERO to do with the decisions. NBC news? Hahahahahah! Try again, you’re still at .000.

NONE of that is true. While Mueller said that his investigation was not "obstructed" in terms of shutting it down or trying to control the direction they took...

Trump refused an interview. That's obstruction

Trump refused to answer a large number of the questions in the written questionnaire. Also obstruction

Mueller found TEN instances of Obstruction and detailed them.

And most importantly Mueller made a POINT of saying that the DOJ rule stating that a President can't be indicted bore HEAVILY on his decision not to recommend charges

Wrong again and again. Trump was under NO obligation to do anything for the senile Mule. Not answering questions? Another fail for you. Not obstruction. But keep spewing that BS LUSH. Maybe some other libtard will buy it. Funny how you loved it when Obozo and his idiots did worset things..