Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know the argument is lost for progressives when they start cowering behind the starving children meme for cover.Act responsibly or pay the consequences.
Starving children?
We as a society, do not allow children to starve. Contraception reduces unwanted children
Pay me now, or pay me later
Act responsibly or pay the consequences.
Starving children?
And progressive whacks like you seem to believe that every woman who has an accidental pregnancy and bears the child is automatically going to end up on the dole.Act responsibly or pay the consequences.
Starving children?
g5000 must think that getting pregnant is devoid of any extenuating circumstances and only happens to those who are irresponsible......Hahahahahaha. This black and white thing about pregnancy just has not basis in reality.
Please explain why the person whose birth control I am paying for cannot pay for it themselves the way I pay for my own insulation and my own birth control.
Birth control is expensive as is insulation. However, the stakes of not having birth control are much higher than the stakes of not having insulation.
If you were to examine Maslow, you'd see that intimacy is one of the recognized needs of humans. To deny the need exists is to question science. Politically you can win favor doing that but it's usually done at your peril otherwise.
It's in society's best interest to fund contraception for low income persons. The government also recognizes the benefits of the citizens to have insulation as well
Tax Incentives Assistance Project
Why should my tax money go toward paying/reducing someone else's tax burden? Because in the long run it's in my best interest that the world isn't plowing through it's heating oil as quickly.
Do these low income people have cell phones? Cable TV? Xboxes? Internet Service? Cars? Tattoos? Piercings? etc? etc?
You know the argument is lost for progressives when they start cowering behind the starving children meme for cover.Starving children?
Like Abortion?
Pay me now or pay me later
What we don't do is presume that every woman who bears a child will become a welfare case as a result.You know the argument is lost for progressives when they start cowering behind the starving children meme for cover.
Like Abortion?
Pay me now or pay me later
Helena GasBag has her head in her....purse. These fucking idiots screech about abortion but they don't want reasonable ways to avoid it. And yes true about kids going hungry in this country:
Hunger in America: 2013 United States Hunger and Poverty Facts
World Hunger Education Service
Hunger in the United States
Three years after the onset of the financial and economic crisis, hunger remains high in the United States. The financial and economic crisis that erupted in 2008 caused a dramatic increase in hunger in the United States. This high level of hunger continues in 2010, according to the latest government report (with the most recent statistics) released in September 2011 (Coleman-Jensen 2011).
In 2010, 17.2 million households, 14.5 percent of households (approximately one in seven), were food insecure, the highest number ever recorded in the United States 1 (Coleman-Jensen 2011, p. v.)
In 2010, about one-third of food-insecure households (6.7 million households, or 5.4 percent of all U.S. households) had very low food security (compared with 4.7 million households (4.1 percent) in 2007. In households with very low food security, the food intake of some household members was reduced, and their normal eating patterns were disrupted because of the households food insecurity (Coleman-Jensen 2011, p. v., Nord 2009, p. iii.) .
In 2010, children were food insecure at times during the year in 9.8 percent of households with children (3.9 million households.) In one percent of households with children,one or more of the children experienced the most severe food-insecure condition measured by USDA, very low food security, in which meals were irregular and food intake was below levels considered adequate by caregivers (Coleman-Jensen 2011, p. vi).
Hunger in America: 2013 United States Hunger and Poverty Facts
GasBag, do you think this is happening in households with high incomes?
Ever hired a carpenter or other installation expert?Now you are just plain lying, to go with being a cheapskate.
Insulation isn't that expensive.
Face it, you are just a garden variety cheapskate.
Probably a crappy tipper, too.
And progressive whacks like you seem to believe that every woman who has an accidental pregnancy and bears the child is automatically going to end up on the dole.Starving children?
g5000 must think that getting pregnant is devoid of any extenuating circumstances and only happens to those who are irresponsible......Hahahahahaha. This black and white thing about pregnancy just has not basis in reality.
As far as i know people people have sex for two reasons.
1) reproduction
2) recreational pleasure
Now if you're having sex to procreate you obviously don't need birth control or condoms so that's not an issue.
But if you are having sex as a recreational activity why is it the government's (tax payer's) job to pay for it?
That would be like asking the government to buy me a new Xbox 1, or to give me a 10 dollar I-tunes card every month.
If you can't afford to buy condoms then you shouldn't be having sex. Just like if i can't afford tickets to redskins games, i shouldn't go to redskins games.
What reason does the government have to provide contraception for the masses?
Texas? Now you are making me LMAO!Ever hired a carpenter or other installation expert?Insulation isn't that expensive.
Face it, you are just a garden variety cheapskate.
Probably a crappy tipper, too.
Installed it myself down in Texas. Had a devil of a time doing it. Why am I paying for you to hire someone to do it for you?
Lazy ass.
There is a federal role for national defense, not for paying for your BC pills, cheapskate.
Tanks aren't mentioned in the constitution. Sorry.
Even more proof that the far left does not understand the constitution.
Texas? Now you are making me LMAO!Ever hired a carpenter or other installation expert?
Face it, you are just a garden variety cheapskate.
Probably a crappy tipper, too.
Installed it myself down in Texas. Had a devil of a time doing it. Why am I paying for you to hire someone to do it for you?
Lazy ass.
Try doing it in a place like North Dakota, where you need upwards of 4-5 times as much.
I pay pros because I want the job done right, and because I'm not a cheapskate like you.
Forget about single women
What about married women who do not want more children? Pennies a day vs paying for the little darlings to go to school
Texas? Now you are making me LMAO!Ever hired a carpenter or other installation expert?
Face it, you are just a garden variety cheapskate.
Probably a crappy tipper, too.
Installed it myself down in Texas. Had a devil of a time doing it. Why am I paying for you to hire someone to do it for you?
Lazy ass.
Try doing it in a place like North Dakota, where you need upwards of 4-5 times as much.
I pay pros because I want the job done right, and because I'm not a cheapskate like you.
As far as i know people people have sex for two reasons.
1) reproduction
2) recreational pleasure
Now if you're having sex to procreate you obviously don't need birth control or condoms so that's not an issue.
But if you are having sex as a recreational activity why is it the government's (tax payer's) job to pay for it?
That would be like asking the government to buy me a new Xbox 1, or to give me a 10 dollar I-tunes card every month.
If you can't afford to buy condoms then you shouldn't be having sex. Just like if i can't afford tickets to redskins games, i shouldn't go to redskins games.
What reason does the government have to provide contraception for the masses?
Every study ever done on the matter reports that its much cheaper to fund contraceptive efforts for low-income persons than it is to fund AFDC and other welfare programs down the line.
Like I said. Hostage taking. "Pay for my abortion/birth control or pay for my kid."
Pro-choice: "I get to choose my lifestyle, and you get to pay for it."
Liberal logic: "Let's create a government benevolence program to justify another government benevolence program."
Tanks aren't mentioned in the constitution. Sorry.
Even more proof that the far left does not understand the constitution.
I understand it fine just pointing out that not every government expenditure ties back to the constitution.
Liberal logic: "Let's create a government benevolence program to justify another government benevolence program."
