Yes. It is by their choices and policies slavery came to be abolished .There is no fallacy to my statement .You are trying to make moral equivalency arguments were non exists.I'm making no moral equivalency arguments. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy in your own statement.
Those you admire were slave owners. Are you going to judge all they say and have done by that? Yes or no.
Had they tried to count black as having "full rights" the souths demographics would have secured slavery forever.
It is because of there imperfections as men, and what they did, we can know how extraordinary their philosophy was .
Military leaders may study the tactics, they are not embracing Mao's philosophy.The argument is not what Mao did but the value of some of his philosophy. Ironically - some of which is embraced by our own politicians and millitary becuase it makes damn good sense.
Politicians can find ample inspiration from the writing of the founding fathers to guide them how to uphold the constitution if that is there goal.
If they are trying to over throw the constitution they would want to embrace the philosophy of a communist revolutionary
proof?there are no communist revolutionaries in Obama's administration.
They call themselves progressives.That you don't understand the problem is no surpriseThey exist primarily in the minds of the Glen Becks and Rush Limbaugh's of this world.
Since you bring up Hitler, what would be wrong with cherry picking some of Hitlers philosophy.The same sort of minds that partnered Bush with Hitler.
Is that appropriate for any politician seeking to uphold the constitution?