Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?

Who were put in power by the will of the people around 62% Of the people

Hitler was democratically elected. Hamas is democratically elected. Iranian politicians are democratically elected. These are no excuses for Bush's fuck ups.

Your comparing modern day Iraq to the third Reich? little desperate perhaps?

JRK, you are a little desperate, obviously. Yes, your defense of Iraq is spurious.

Let's add that women's rights in the south of Iraq are now not even in the back seat but in the trunk. It will continue to get worse.

YOu see, you are guilty of what Bush did: say one reason, then give another. Fail.
 
All things considered, we entered Iraq for all the wrong reasons. It really had nothing to do with WMD's.

Bush wanted an easy victory in the Middle East and to democratize a country there by force. By doing so, browbeat neighboring states into further democratization. Iraq was the best target. They pissed off any neighbors who would be willing to support them. The world already aligned against Saddam once. His military forces were crap. We were already in the area. NOBODY would miss Saddam's removal. Least of all the Iraqis.

By democratizing Iraq, we would draw in wannabe jihadis to the area to be met with military force. It would draw away potential attacks to Europe and the US. Iraq being easier for a Saudi, Syrian or Jordanian wannabe bomber to go to than the West. Draw them to Iraq, annhilate them and show the world how ruthless these Islamicists are to fellow Muslim civilians.

The problem was, it was done too much on the cheap. We believed far too much of our own propaganda bullshit as to what would be needed for occupation and we got lazy when it came time to providing the necessary level of commitment of forces.

That being said, Saddam had it coming. He deserved his fate. The country has toned down quite a bit since 2003-2004.

Iraqis are really taking to democracy a lot better than expected. The civil war everyone was expecting between the Kurds, Shia and Sunni has not materialized. If anything Al Queda's attempts to spark one has actually brought Iraqis closer together. They are actually looking at political solutions to the ethnic divisions. Something one does when they want to be democratic.

You can even say that the war helped spark the Arab Spring. Once it was seen that the West would be willing to support Arab democracies over longstanding cronies. You had an actual example of an Arab country with a democratic leadership, it undermined the sad myths that Arabs just weren't ready for democracy.

I do not totally agree with your thread
but it was done with class
for that I thank you

You're Welcome. My guess is you don't agree with my take on why we went into Iraq. I do agree with your assessment of the results.

Frankly, I think we had to democratize an Arab country if we were going to undermine Al Queda. Our support of Arab dictatorships makes those idiots look like a legitimate insurgency.

When we created a democracy over there and now currently support democratic movements, we take away AQ's greatest appeal, as the alleged alternative to the ruling dictators. AQ only flourished because these Arab leaders had done such a good job in the last 30 years in driving out prior political moderate and democratic movements. Islamicsm was created by these dictators to give a form of dissent which could be co-opted and appropriated.
---
I know my views are a little off-kilter from the usual partisan sniping on the subject but it puts things in perspective in a way most won't.
 
You can just as easily say the Arab Spring happened DESPITE IRAQ, or that the newly free muslims are more anti-Israel and anti-western occupation than the old dictators. It was the stupidest war ever and cost us 2-3 trillion for nothing. Add Raygun's covert advenyturist messes in the area and god knows how many lives and treasure were lost. tyvm
 
Saddam did in fact use chemical weapons not only on the rebel Kurds but also against the Iranian troops during the war with Iran.

Bullshit

"Having looked at all of the evidence that was available to us, we find it impossible to confirm the State Department's claim that gas was used in this instance. To begin with there were never any victims produced. International relief organizations who examined the Kurds -- in Turkey where they had gone for asylum -- failed to discover any. Nor were there ever any found inside Iraq. The claim rests solely on testimony of the Kurds who had crossed the border into Turkey, where they were interviewed by staffers of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee."

STEPHEN C. PELLETIERE
US Army War College
CIA analyst

US Army War College: NO PROOF SADDAM GASSED THE KURDS!


Did your link say no victims?

The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e

Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.

.
 
It's all in Sadaam's confession..........All he had to do was come clean. He himself chose to continue his charade. Chose to repeatedly kick the inspectors out. Repeatedly fire on our planes. Repeatedly rattle his sword.

And, it was chemical weapons that he used on his own people....So yes, there was every reason to believe he still had them, and would use them if necessary.


HUH?

Do you ever research anything?

What "inspectors"?

What chemicals against his own people?

.



If you are this completely ignorant, why bother discussing the topic?

If you are so fucking knowledgeable answer the goddamned questions.

.
 
Did your link say no victims?

The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e

Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.

.[/QUOTE]


How's that twisting of reality going? Does it fit your agenda yet?
 
Bullshit

"Having looked at all of the evidence that was available to us, we find it impossible to confirm the State Department's claim that gas was used in this instance. To begin with there were never any victims produced. International relief organizations who examined the Kurds -- in Turkey where they had gone for asylum -- failed to discover any. Nor were there ever any found inside Iraq. The claim rests solely on testimony of the Kurds who had crossed the border into Turkey, where they were interviewed by staffers of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee."

STEPHEN C. PELLETIERE
US Army War College
CIA analyst

US Army War College: NO PROOF SADDAM GASSED THE KURDS!


Did your link say no victims?

The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e

Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.

.
Are you really that ignorant?
 
Did your link say no victims?

The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e

Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.

.


How's that twisting of reality going? Does it fit your agenda yet?[/QUOTE]


Again dumb ass. Our people are telling us that there WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT SADDAM GASSED THE KURDS.

So, who was fucking IMPARTIAL in the region at the time?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

.
 
Did your link say no victims?

The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e

Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.

.
Are you really that ignorant?

Don't ask stupid questions and come up with FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.
 
You can just as easily say the Arab Spring happened DESPITE IRAQ, or that the newly free muslims are more anti-Israel and anti-western occupation than the old dictators. It was the stupidest war ever and cost us 2-3 trillion for nothing. Add Raygun's covert advenyturist messes in the area and god knows how many lives and treasure were lost. tyvm

Except they aren't really anti-Israel and Anti-West. Once arab countries liberalize, they tend to cosy up to both of them. Most of that is the former dictators trying to scapegoat outsiders to cover up their own misrule.
 
Does anyone really want to make an argument that Saddam deserved to continue to rule Iraq?
How about the fact that his even crazier sons will never rule Iraq?

Not really an argument for keeping Saddam. He had to die sometime, letting his sons take over.

It was far better that we put all three of them in the ground.

And why is that?

There are far worse dictators around the world.

Wanna start giving them dirt naps too?
 
If you are this completely ignorant, why bother discussing the topic?

If you are so fucking knowledgeable answer the goddamned questions.

.


You got it backwards, shitforbrains. If you are so fucking ignorant STFU until you have some fucking idea what the fuck you are talking about.

Let me re-state the facts.

The administration ADMITTED that it was using CIA agents as UN inspectors. Links were provided.

Congressional Investigators , led by Mr Pelletier, found no evidence that Kurds have been gassed.

So what are you relying upon for your assertions?!?!?!?!?!?!?

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top