Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?

[Wicked Jester]

Liberals are truly fuckin' idiots.

There's no doubt about it. There's no white washing it. There's no disputing it, it cannot be refuted.

Liberals are truly fuckin' idiots......It's just the way it is.

 

[Contumacious]

Poison Gas
The CIA had contacted Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was being paid by the French as an agent. Sabri informed them that Saddam had hidden poison gas among Sunni tribesmen,

Gee, who the fuck supplied Saddam nerve gas.......er......could it have been one Ronald Reagan?

"According to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, in a December 15, 1986 article, the CIA began to secretly supply Iraq with intelligence in 1984 that was used to "calibrate" mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. Beginning in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive US satellite reconnaissance photography … to assist Iraqi bombing raids".

Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

.

 

[JRK]

Poison Gas
The CIA had contacted Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was being paid by the French as an agent. Sabri informed them that Saddam had hidden poison gas among Sunni tribesmen,

Gee, who the fuck supplied Saddam nerve gas.......er......could it have been one Ronald Reagan?

"According to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, in a December 15, 1986 article, the CIA began to secretly supply Iraq with intelligence in 1984 that was used to "calibrate" mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. Beginning in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive US satellite reconnaissance photography … to assist Iraqi bombing raids".

Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

.

so wat does those alleged events have to do with the events of 991 thru 2003
Libs you re writing history after the events have a known out come
Saddam caused these events
not RR
not BC
not GWB
no 9-11 these events we deal with today may have not occured the way they did

9-11 chaned the way we looked at those who threatend us
Saddam was areal threat
he is not nor is the country he used

 

[Wicked Jester]

Poison Gas
The CIA had contacted Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was being paid by the French as an agent. Sabri informed them that Saddam had hidden poison gas among Sunni tribesmen,

Gee, who the fuck supplied Saddam nerve gas.......er......could it have been one Ronald Reagan?

"According to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, in a December 15, 1986 article, the CIA began to secretly supply Iraq with intelligence in 1984 that was used to "calibrate" mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. Beginning in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive US satellite reconnaissance photography … to assist Iraqi bombing raids".

Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

.

So, WTF are you bitching about, lil' man?

You support a man who believes Iran should have nukes.......Hell, that crazy ol' Bugger would probably give them the materials to do just that.......'cause that crazy ol' coot hates this country with a passion.....Like Obama, it's nothing but ridiculous apologies and guilt trips.

Well, all you Obamabots and Paullettes can suck dick, you anti-american liberal bastards.

 

[Wicked Jester]

Poison Gas
The CIA had contacted Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, who was being paid by the French as an agent. Sabri informed them that Saddam had hidden poison gas among Sunni tribesmen,

Gee, who the fuck supplied Saddam nerve gas.......er......could it have been one Ronald Reagan?

"According to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, in a December 15, 1986 article, the CIA began to secretly supply Iraq with intelligence in 1984 that was used to "calibrate" mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. Beginning in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive US satellite reconnaissance photography … to assist Iraqi bombing raids".

Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

.

so wat does those alleged events have to do with the events of 991 thru 2003
Libs you re writing history after the events have a known out come
Saddam caused these events
not RR
not BC
not GWB
no 9-11 these events we deal with today may have not occured the way they did

9-11 chaned the way we looked at those who threatend us
Saddam was areal threat
he is not nor is the country he used

Notice how Woodward never said we supplied the actual mustard gas.

Once again, the Paullette paranoia shines through.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you answer is no you don't understand the difference between a terrorist bombing a police station to kill massive amounts of people and a domestic dispute? Got it.

So you're desperate, and throw shit indiscriminately in hopes of distracting from the total disaster that is Obama.

I get it.

 

[Unkotare]

Sure.
1) I resent having POTUS, VPOTUS, SecDef lies through their teeth in order to get approval. There was never was any belief by any of them that Saddam had WMDs.
...

Now, do you gain mind-reading powers when you become an extreme lefty or do you have to have them already to be accepted as an extreme lefty?

LOL! You're whackjobbery is leaking out again sweetheart. It is easy to prove to anyone with a military background and who doesn't drink so deeply of the kool-aid, they can actually think for themselves - at least for a moment or two.
But I get it. It's cool. You and your Right Wing whackjobs can't deny the thoughts and opinions that have been so thoroguhly fed into your sheeple brains.
No free-thinking ability. This is why you do the first thing all whackjobs do - label anyone who doesn't drink the kool-aid as a "Liberal", "Lefty" etc... Of course, that is as stupid as your response and also as easily disproven.

You didn't answer my question about your mind-reading ability. Don't be shy.

 

[Unkotare]

I don't give a flying fuck about the UN.........We had just been attacked. One of our enemies was rattling his sword. He was given many opportunities to come clean about everything, he refused.....

Yeah....sure.....



.....that's.....

what happened

YES, that is what happened.

 

[JRK]

Now, do you gain mind-reading powers when you become an extreme lefty or do you have to have them already to be accepted as an extreme lefty?

LOL! You're whackjobbery is leaking out again sweetheart. It is easy to prove to anyone with a military background and who doesn't drink so deeply of the kool-aid, they can actually think for themselves - at least for a moment or two.
But I get it. It's cool. You and your Right Wing whackjobs can't deny the thoughts and opinions that have been so thoroguhly fed into your sheeple brains.
No free-thinking ability. This is why you do the first thing all whackjobs do - label anyone who doesn't drink the kool-aid as a "Liberal", "Lefty" etc... Of course, that is as stupid as your response and also as easily disproven.

You didn't answer my question about your mind-reading ability. Don't be shy.

independantlogic
What lies

 

[JRK]

Can you comprehend the difference between politically motivated violence and domestic violence?

Yes to the dead it doesn't matter, however to the living I think it matters that some of the Iraqi are still blowing shit up.

and we are still shooting shit up
whats the difference except you want it to be different
scum bags are scum bags
politically motivated?
If selling crack was legal, you think we would have the same amount of murders?

Boo its the kool aid you drink. if any liberal would just stop and think for 5 minutes 95% of this stuff is no different than the same crap we deal with every day
the difference is 11 years ago they had no choice in these matters and we did not know what Saddam was up to

I disagree. I don't see the any warring factions in the US that is simular to the Sunnis, Shiite or Kurds.

Boo
the gangs that range from the krips fighting over drug territory to the Vietnamese in Houston fighting over the shrimp market dominance is no different
It is politically motivated

 

[traveler52]

Sure.
1) I resent having POTUS, VPOTUS, SecDef lies through their teeth in order to get approval. There was never was any belief by any of them that Saddam had WMDs.
...

Now, do you gain mind-reading powers when you become an extreme lefty or do you have to have them already to be accepted as an extreme lefty?

LOL! You're whackjobbery is leaking out again sweetheart. It is easy to prove to anyone with a military background and who doesn't drink so deeply of the kool-aid, they can actually think for themselves - at least for a moment or two.
But I get it. It's cool. You and your Right Wing whackjobs can't deny the thoughts and opinions that have been so thoroguhly fed into your sheeple brains.
No free-thinking ability. This is why you do the first thing all whackjobs do - label anyone who doesn't drink the kool-aid as a "Liberal", "Lefty" etc... Of course, that is as stupid as your response and also as easily disproven.

This is so fucking amazing.

ConJobs/Repugs/Teahadists raged when President Clinton LIED ABOUT A BLOW-JOB (Lewinsky did not even Swallow). "Impeach Him" was your battle cry.

But when:

The Shrub Lied about W.M.D. (Weapons of Mass Destruction), not one demand for Impeachment.

The Shrub Lied about "Attempts to purchase uranium in Africa", not one demand for Impeachment.

The Shrub Lied about Biological and Chemical Weapons, not one demand for Impeachment.

When the shrub lied about "Nuclur Weapons" not one demand for Impeachment.

When Dead-Eye Dick(less) lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction, not one demand for Impeachment.

When Dead-Eye Dick(less) lied about Biological and Chemical Weapons, not demand for Impeachment.

When Rummy lied about "We Know Where They Are" (Weapons of Mass Destruction), not one demand he step down.

When Condie lied about Nuclear Weapons "We don't want the Smoking Gun to become a Mushroom Cloud", not one demand she step down.

Lies.

Lies.

Lies.

Not one demand for Impeachment.

Not one demand for accountability.

Yeah, the RW whack jobs really believe in accountability.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is so fucking amazing.

ConJobs/Repugs/Teahadists raged when President Clinton LIED ABOUT A BLOW-JOB (Lewinsky did not even Swallow). "Impeach Him" was your battle cry.

So were you born mentally retarded then? I mean, this could be the result of a serious head injury. That's a frightening thought, we all could be only one car crash away from being like you.....

 

[JRK]

Now, do you gain mind-reading powers when you become an extreme lefty or do you have to have them already to be accepted as an extreme lefty?

LOL! You're whackjobbery is leaking out again sweetheart. It is easy to prove to anyone with a military background and who doesn't drink so deeply of the kool-aid, they can actually think for themselves - at least for a moment or two.
But I get it. It's cool. You and your Right Wing whackjobs can't deny the thoughts and opinions that have been so thoroguhly fed into your sheeple brains.
No free-thinking ability. This is why you do the first thing all whackjobs do - label anyone who doesn't drink the kool-aid as a "Liberal", "Lefty" etc... Of course, that is as stupid as your response and also as easily disproven.

This is so fucking amazing.

ConJobs/Repugs/Teahadists raged when President Clinton LIED ABOUT A BLOW-JOB (Lewinsky did not even Swallow). "Impeach Him" was your battle cry.

But when:

The Shrub Lied about W.M.D. (Weapons of Mass Destruction), not one demand for Impeachment.

The Shrub Lied about "Attempts to purchase uranium in Africa", not one demand for Impeachment.

The Shrub Lied about Biological and Chemical Weapons, not one demand for Impeachment.

When the shrub lied about "Nuclur Weapons" not one demand for Impeachment.

When Dead-Eye Dick(less) lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction, not one demand for Impeachment.

When Dead-Eye Dick(less) lied about Biological and Chemical Weapons, not demand for Impeachment.

When Rummy lied about "We Know Where They Are" (Weapons of Mass Destruction), not one demand he step down.

When Condie lied about Nuclear Weapons "We don't want the Smoking Gun to become a Mushroom Cloud", not one demand she step down.

Lies.

Lies.

Lies.

Not one demand for Impeachment.

Not one demand for accountability.

Yeah, the RW whack jobs really believe in accountability.

well let us review
Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix remarked in January 2003 that "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance—not even today—of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."[117] Among other things he noted that 1,000 short tons (910 t) of chemical agent were unaccounted for, information on Iraq's VX nerve agent program was missing, and that "no convincing evidence" was presented for the destruction of 8,500 litres (1,900 imp gal; 2,200 US gal) of anthrax that had been declared.[117]

that should take care of the UNs part in the facts
this stuff existed and has never been found

American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2006 – The 500 munitions discovered throughout Iraq since 2003 and discussed in a National Ground Intelligence Center report meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction, the center's commander said here today.

"These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.

The munitions found contain sarin and mustard gases, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said. Sarin attacks the neurological system and is potentially lethal.

"Mustard is a blister agent (that) actually produces burning of any area (where) an individual may come in contact with the agent," he said. It also is potentially fatal if it gets into a person's lungs.

The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, Maples said. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, Chu added.

While that's reassuring, the agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said. "We're talking chemical agents here that could be packaged in a different format and have a great effect," he said, referencing the sarin-gas attack on a Japanese subway in the mid-1990s.

This is true even considering any degradation of the chemical agents that may have occurred, Chu said. It's not known exactly how sarin breaks down, but no matter how degraded the agent is, it's still toxic.

"Regardless of (how much material in the weapon is actually chemical agent), any remaining agent is toxic," he said. "Anything above zero (percent agent) would prove to be toxic, and if you were exposed to it long enough, lethal."

Though about 500 chemical weapons - the exact number has not been released publicly - have been found, Maples said he doesn't believe Iraq is a "WMD-free zone."

"I do believe the former regime did a very poor job of accountability of munitions, and certainly did not document the destruction of munitions," he said. "The recovery program goes on, and I do not believe we have found all the weapons."

The Defense Intelligence Agency director said locating and disposing of chemical weapons in Iraq is one of the most important tasks servicemembers in the country perform.

Maples added searches are ongoing for chemical weapons beyond those being conducted solely for force protection.

There has been a call for a complete declassification of the National Ground Intelligence Center's report on WMD in Iraq. Maples said he believes the director of national intelligence is still considering this option, and has asked Maples to look into producing an unclassified paper addressing the subject matter in the center's report.

Much of the classified matter was slated for discussion in a closed forum after the open hearings this morning.

Biographies:
Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, USA

Related Sites:
Defense Intelligence Agency
National Ground Intelligence Center

These WMDs were to be destroyed. in 2204 they were inbad shape
in 1999
2000?

The UN never claimed to ask Iraq to destroy part of there stockpiles
all of them
Saddam had lied, and Your thread is in accurate
do your DD in the future please
oh yea
500 Tons of Uranium Yellowcake Moved From Iraq to Canada-Truth!

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Are you seriously trying to say we stabilized Iraq?
Are you trying to say that we were justified because we conjured up some "WMDs" after we failed to find any and still proceeded?

This thread is a fucking travesty worse than most of the drool I click on at this site.

Ser. get a grip. Or JOAB, DIAF and then KYS.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Lastly, any munitions that we "found" there we fucking sold to them. So, I really don't know where you are coming from.

 

[JRK]

Lastly, any munitions that we "found" there we fucking sold to them. So, I really don't know where you are coming from.

It is your right to dis agree with the invasion
you have no right to ignore the facts

The link clearly shows that every thing Saddam was told to do or else, he ignored.
was there bad intel? the fatcs say yes, but they also point clearly that much Saddam had decalred to have had has never been seen, it was never destroyed as he was told to do by all

This country in a majority agreed then and now it was the right thing to do
Saddam is gone
There last election had over a 60% turnout

10 years ago there was no vote'

There economy is growing faster than any other

these are facts u caanot dispute
Economy of Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
BBC News - Iraq election turnout 62%, officials say

 

[BlindBoo]

and we are still shooting shit up
whats the difference except you want it to be different
scum bags are scum bags
politically motivated?
If selling crack was legal, you think we would have the same amount of murders?

Boo its the kool aid you drink. if any liberal would just stop and think for 5 minutes 95% of this stuff is no different than the same crap we deal with every day
the difference is 11 years ago they had no choice in these matters and we did not know what Saddam was up to

I disagree. I don't see the any warring factions in the US that is simular to the Sunnis, Shiite or Kurds.

Boo
the gangs that range from the krips fighting over drug territory to the Vietnamese in Houston fighting over the shrimp market dominance is no different
It is politically motivated

Gang on gang violence is over territory not political. Very few if any coordinated bomb attacks targeting the government by either of them, unless of course you have a some examples????

 

[BlindBoo]

So you answer is no you don't understand the difference between a terrorist bombing a police station to kill massive amounts of people and a domestic dispute? Got it.

So you're desperate, and throw shit indiscriminately in hopes of distracting from the total disaster that is Obama.

I get it.

Your opinion of President Obamas performance has nothing to do with President Bushes strategic blunder of invading and occupying Iraq.

 

[BlindBoo]

Gee, who the fuck supplied Saddam nerve gas.......er......could it have been one Ronald Reagan?

"According to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, in a December 15, 1986 article, the CIA began to secretly supply Iraq with intelligence in 1984 that was used to "calibrate" mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. Beginning in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive US satellite reconnaissance photography … to assist Iraqi bombing raids".

Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

.

so wat does those alleged events have to do with the events of 991 thru 2003
Libs you re writing history after the events have a known out come
Saddam caused these events
not RR
not BC
not GWB
no 9-11 these events we deal with today may have not occured the way they did

9-11 chaned the way we looked at those who threatend us
Saddam was areal threat
he is not nor is the country he used

Notice how Woodward never said we supplied the actual mustard gas.

Once again, the Paullette paranoia shines through.

Well that might be because Iraq already had the technology to produce mustard gas before Raygun took them off the Nation who supprt terrorist list. That allow not only US companies but all other western nations to sell duel use technology as well as supplies to Iraq. In fact no US companies sold Iraq any chemicals, a German company did. The US did export several nasty biological cultures to Iraq however.

 

[JRK]

I disagree. I don't see the any warring factions in the US that is simular to the Sunnis, Shiite or Kurds.

Boo
the gangs that range from the krips fighting over drug territory to the Vietnamese in Houston fighting over the shrimp market dominance is no different
It is politically motivated

Gang on gang violence is over territory not political. Very few if any coordinated bomb attacks targeting the government by either of them, unless of course you have a some examples????

so who controls a territory is not political?
ok