Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, what I said was that the UN was too much of a feckless, impotent, corrupt body to enforce its (many!) resolutions so the US decided to do so when we concluded that was in our national interest.
I also mentioned how the UN was better at raping civilians and spreading cholera than doing anything useful. I may also have mentioned talking too much, pushing papers, and passing resolution after resolution they have no intention of enforcing, thus giving encouragement to tyrants like saddam and dirty dealers like Koffi Annan's own son.
Actually, what I said was that the UN was too much of a feckless, impotent, corrupt body to enforce its (many!) resolutions so the US decided to do so when we concluded that was in our national interest.
I also mentioned how the UN was better at raping civilians and spreading cholera than doing anything useful. I may also have mentioned talking too much, pushing papers, and passing resolution after resolution they have no intention of enforcing, thus giving encouragement to tyrants like saddam and dirty dealers like Koffi Annan's own son.
Prior to that in answer to:
When did the UN Security Council authorize an invasion of Iraq?
You said:
UN Resolutions # 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, 1284, and of course 1441 that specifically mentioned a "final opportunity to comply,"
didn't you. Or are you now recanting your claim that the UNSC authorized an invasion?
Actually, what I said was that the UN was too much of a feckless, impotent, corrupt body to enforce its (many!) resolutions so the US decided to do so when we concluded that was in our national interest.
I also mentioned how the UN was better at raping civilians and spreading cholera than doing anything useful. I may also have mentioned talking too much, pushing papers, and passing resolution after resolution they have no intention of enforcing, thus giving encouragement to tyrants like saddam and dirty dealers like Koffi Annan's own son.
Prior to that in answer to:
When did the UN Security Council authorize an invasion of Iraq?
You said:
UN Resolutions # 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, 1284, and of course 1441 that specifically mentioned a "final opportunity to comply,"
didn't you. Or are you now recanting your claim that the UNSC authorized an invasion?
This country does not answer to the UN
this mess they created
Actually, what I said was that the UN was too much of a feckless, impotent, corrupt body to enforce its (many!) resolutions so the US decided to do so when we concluded that was in our national interest.
I also mentioned how the UN was better at raping civilians and spreading cholera than doing anything useful. I may also have mentioned talking too much, pushing papers, and passing resolution after resolution they have no intention of enforcing, thus giving encouragement to tyrants like saddam and dirty dealers like Koffi Annan's own son.
Prior to that in answer to:
When did the UN Security Council authorize an invasion of Iraq?
You said:
UN Resolutions # 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, 1284, and of course 1441 that specifically mentioned a "final opportunity to comply,"
didn't you. Or are you now recanting your claim that the UNSC authorized an invasion?
This country does not answer to the UN
this mess they created
I served with self-inflated yokes like you.
Did you get paroled, or was your sentence up?
Talk to those men and women who left the service from 1987 on and ask if Iran-Contra played a role. Many will tell you "yes".
Were some in prison with you?
Neo-con imperialism only weakens us, Jester. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq II, etc. Whenever we do it for imperial goals rather than the needs of the oppressed, we fail. Simple end game. Compare the last sixty years to 1941 to 1949, and let's see if you can figure why.
If only we had a collectivist like you running things.... You socialists only care about "the oppressed!"
Son, I am one of the better off fellows in my end of the state, and I thank capitalism for my family being fairly well off.
Enforcing any UN resolution without UN approval is illegal under internationial law.
1) REMOVE SADDAM
DONE
2) STABILIZE COUNTRY
DONE
3) HAVE A REPUBLIC BORN OF THESE EVENTS
DONE
Am missing something here?
"Socialist"? Me?
We did WWII for ourselves and the oppressed of the world,
and in Europe we won the peace with the Marshall Plan. We have lost in Asia and the Middle East generally because we don't include the needs of the everyday national of the country.
"Socialism?" You live in la la land.
1) REMOVE SADDAM
DONE
2) STABILIZE COUNTRY
DONE
3) HAVE A REPUBLIC BORN OF THESE EVENTS
DONE
Am missing something here?
Yeah, so what??? Which one of those things affected us directly???
WTF?Enforcing any UN resolution without UN approval is illegal under internationial law. That is why the senior bushies cannot travel in Europe.
LMAO!You're a fuckin' lunatic, Jane.Because Jester is partisan before he is American.
Now, where's your proof of all those NCO's and Officers leaving in droves?
You're full of fuckin' shit, and you damn well know it....Just another far left slapdick runnin' off at the mouth.
I served with self-inflated yokes like you. Talk to those men and women who left the service from 1987 on and ask if Iran-Contra played a role. Many will tell you "yes".
Neo-con imperialism only weakens us, Jester. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq II, etc. Whenever we do it for imperial goals rather than the needs of the oppressed, we fail. Simple end game. Compare the last sixty years to 1941 to 1949, and let's see if you can figure why.
WTF?Enforcing any UN resolution without UN approval is illegal under internationial law. That is why the senior bushies cannot travel in Europe.
"Socialist"? Me?
I suppose slinging crack is a form of Socialism.
We did WWII for ourselves and the oppressed of the world,
Izzatrite? We saw all the starving Children in Mexico and the Congo, then went right over and killed Germans...
and in Europe we won the peace with the Marshall Plan. We have lost in Asia and the Middle East generally because we don't include the needs of the everyday national of the country.
"Socialism?" You live in la la land.
Sparky, you truly are an idiot.
Are you as big a drunk? Some of my fellow veterans, like you, are such a disgrace to the uniform. We have seen so many 'patriots' like you on the board, no love for self or for country. Such a sorry bunch
1) REMOVE SADDAM
DONE
2) STABILIZE COUNTRY
DONE
3) HAVE A REPUBLIC BORN OF THESE EVENTS
DONE
Am missing something here?
Yeah, so what??? Which one of those things affected us directly???
The Taliban in Afghanistan didn't "directly" attack us, did they?
