Will someone please help me? I’m just not seeing the Memo dangers.

Yet, somehow I don't feel less safe right now

Could someone please enlighten me about what threat or threats might be lurking from sharing this information about malfeasance from many on the left and within our intelligence infrastructure?

OR is it that I was, once again, lied to by leftists trying to hold onto power :dunno:
And then it turns out to be a big nothing


You're a little slow so let's make it a simple question. Was it a nothing burger or was it a threat to our national security like all the Democrats claimed it was going to be?
 
BTW, it was just reported that the FISA Judge WAS MADE AWARE that the dossier did come from paid opposition research.... so the Nunes memo, lied.....

Also, in previous FISA WARRANT cases that lead to suits, the Court ruled that information provided by partisan or biased sources is no reason to turn down this evidence presented to the FISA judge.....

let that sink in.....

Link please.
 
BTW, it was just reported that the FISA Judge WAS MADE AWARE that the dossier did come from paid opposition research.... so the Nunes memo, lied.....

Also, in previous FISA WARRANT cases that lead to suits, the Court ruled that information provided by partisan sources is no reason to turn down this evidence presented to the FISA judge.....

let that sink in.....

What no reliable link?
just heard them both on tv a few minutes ago.....
 
next time i hear it, I'll see what they say about who the source is, and will give you a link! :)
 
though what did happen, is the R's and theTrumpster, put a grin from ear to ear on Putin....

great job! :clap2:

"Russia ..Russia .. Russia" .. the liberal and parasite media mantra for the past year and a half. Putin loves them no doubt
we're only screaming louder because you all just have been tone deaf from the start and have totally ignored and brushed off what they did in this past election cycle!!!!

for your entertainment..

.
d3d054a3230985aeb194c7317bc55184.jpg

.
images (26).jpg
.
why trump won.jpg
 
The question has now become ~

Is there anything, anything at all Trump could do that the Republicans would not construct a fake 'crisis' or 'worse than Watergate' fallacy to cover his wrong doing? Because right now there appears to be nothing he could do where they would put the country before their party. Nothing.
 
what in the world is The Trumpster trying to hide and deflect and obfuscate....?
 
BTW, it was just reported that the FISA Judge WAS MADE AWARE that the dossier did come from paid opposition research.... so the Nunes memo, lied.....

Also, in previous FISA WARRANT cases that lead to suits, the Court ruled that information provided by partisan or biased sources is no reason to turn down this evidence presented to the FISA judge.....

let that sink in.....

Link please.
as i mentioned, I heard it on the tv, when they repeat it and say the source again, which inevitably they will, I will find you a link..
 
instead we got piss mixed with vinegar and over flowing lies and deception! :D


The memo is just the beginning .. sheesh

False documents generated by the Clinton campaign were used by the Obama administration to undermine and spy on a (Trump) Presidential candidate and steal an election seems to be the probable bottom line.

If the scenario was reversed Democrats and the parasite media wouldn't care in the least...:popcorn:
 
instead we got piss mixed with vinegar and over flowing lies and deception! :D


The memo is just the beginning .. sheesh

False documents generated by the Clinton campaign were used by the Obama administration to undermine and spy on a (Trump) Presidential candidate and steal an election seems to be the probable bottom line.

If the scenario was reversed Democrats and the parasite media wouldn't care in the least...:popcorn:
good luck with that! :D
your beloved Nunes memo, says in the last paragraph, that the Russian investigation began with Papadopolous mouthing off in a bar with an Australian diplomat back in May of 2016 that the Russians had clinton/ campaign emails as dirt on Hillary....

and not with the dossier, not by Clinton....
 
instead we got piss mixed with vinegar and over flowing lies and deception! :D


The memo is just the beginning .. sheesh

False documents generated by the Clinton campaign were used by the Obama administration to undermine and spy on a (Trump) Presidential candidate and steal an election seems to be the probable bottom line.

If the scenario was reversed Democrats and the parasite media wouldn't care in the least...:popcorn:
good luck with that! :D
your beloved Nunes memo, says in the last paragraph, that the Russian investigation began with Papadopolous mouthing off in a bar with an Australian diplomat back in May of 2016 that the Russians had clinton/ campaign emails as dirt on Hillary....

and not with the dossier, not by Clinton....

Beloved..:laugh: ... I appreciate that Nunes finally got the ball rolling and we're all being informed for a change instead of suckholing left wing parasite crapola but you're welcome to continue, no problem.

So now the direction of the left in personal attacks and twisting reality as opposed to finding out the facts... nothing new there.
 
We have always known that the whole RUSSIANS deal was a farce created to undermine a duly elected President

No one really believes that Trump was complicit in collusion, no one exceptthe unthinking and easily swayed pawns anyway...
 
instead we got piss mixed with vinegar and over flowing lies and deception! :D


The memo is just the beginning .. sheesh

False documents generated by the Clinton campaign were used by the Obama administration to undermine and spy on a (Trump) Presidential candidate and steal an election seems to be the probable bottom line.

If the scenario was reversed Democrats and the parasite media wouldn't care in the least...:popcorn:
good luck with that! :D
your beloved Nunes memo, says in the last paragraph, that the Russian investigation began with Papadopolous mouthing off in a bar with an Australian diplomat back in May of 2016 that the Russians had clinton/ campaign emails as dirt on Hillary....

and not with the dossier, not by Clinton....

Beloved..:laugh: ... I appreciate that Nunes finally got the ball rolling and we're all being informed for a change instead of suckholing left wing parasite crapola but you're welcome to continue, no problem.

So now the direction of the left in personal attacks and twisting reality as opposed to finding out the facts... nothing new there.
the Nunes memo was a dud....
 
here's a link on some of it from Adam Schiff....yes a democrat.. but someone who actually READ the underlying top secret material....unlike Nunes, the sponsor of the memo.... I'll keep searching

The 3 big lies in the Nunes memo, according to Democrats

On Friday, House Republicans and Donald Trump decided to release the Nunes memo, which purports to expose corruption and partisanship within the Department of Justice and the FBI. It suggests that surveillance of Carter Page, a one-time adviser to the Trump campaign, was based in part on a dossier funded by Democrats. The memo, taken at face value, falls well short of the hype.

But, in public statements and private comments to the press, Democrats are saying that at least three important claims in the document are incorrect.

Democrats say they have proof of these lies but are being blocked from making that information public. Adam Schiff and other Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee prepared a rebuttal to the Nunes memo with all the relevant facts but Republicans voted against making that document public.

The memo says the Deputy FBI Director testified there would have been no surveillance of Page without the dossier.
The heart of the memo is that the surveillance of Page would not have been possible without the Steele dossier. The memo says, “Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from FISC [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information.” Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee say that is not true.

Adam Schiff, the ranking Democratic member, also confirmed that only portions of the dossier were presented to the court and some of that information already had “corroboration.”

The memo says the FBI failed to notify the surveillance court about the funding of the Steele dossier.
The memo says that the surveillance court was not notified that funding for the Steele dossier came from supporters of Hillary Clinton. “The application does not mention Steele was working on behalf of — and paid by — the DNC and the Clinton campaign,” the memo reads. A statement released by Schiff says claims “that the FBI failed to alert the court as to Mr. Steele’s potential political motivations or the political motivations of those who hired him” are “not accurate.”

The memo says that an article by Yahoo News was used to corroborate the Steele dossier.
The memo spends a long time discussing an article in Yahoo News, claiming it was used by the FBI to corroborate the Steele dossier. This is important, according to the memo, because Steele was allegedly a source for the Yahoo News article and, therefore, the corroboration was circular. Schiff’s statement says “this is not at all why the article was referenced.” The statement does not elaborate, presumably because the actual use of the Yahoo News article is still classified.

Schiff’s statement also says there are other inaccuracies in the Republican memo which would be revealed by the rebuttal memo prepared by Democrats.
 
instead we got piss mixed with vinegar and over flowing lies and deception! :D


The memo is just the beginning .. sheesh

False documents generated by the Clinton campaign were used by the Obama administration to undermine and spy on a (Trump) Presidential candidate and steal an election seems to be the probable bottom line.

If the scenario was reversed Democrats and the parasite media wouldn't care in the least...:popcorn:
good luck with that! :D
your beloved Nunes memo, says in the last paragraph, that the Russian investigation began with Papadopolous mouthing off in a bar with an Australian diplomat back in May of 2016 that the Russians had clinton/ campaign emails as dirt on Hillary....

and not with the dossier, not by Clinton....

Beloved..:laugh: ... I appreciate that Nunes finally got the ball rolling and we're all being informed for a change instead of suckholing left wing parasite crapola but you're welcome to continue, no problem.

So now the direction of the left in personal attacks and twisting reality as opposed to finding out the facts... nothing new there.
the Nunes memo was a dud....

I suppose if Trump (illegally with false documents) used the the intelligence agencies to secretly investigate each and every Democratic candidate (and their campaign members/private citizens) in the next elections to undermine their campaigns and win the elections you and the fake media would be cool with that.... essentially, that's what your ultimately approving of as your dud judgement.
 
Last edited:
Even people on CNN are confused about the danger of the memo being released. There simply isn't any. Why isn't the democrat press the least bit interested in government overreach and misconduct? This has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation. If the allegations into FBI or DOJ corruption are false, it would have no impact on the investigation. Shouldn't the press at least look into if the allegations are true before they start screaming partisan misconduct and making up false security risks?
 

Forum List

Back
Top