Will Speaker Pelosi withhold articles of impeachment from Senate until guaranteed a fair trial?

[Faun]

McConnell will quickly force acquittal without consideration of the evidence. He has declared he is not impartial.

Let Trump run as an impeached President not an acquitted one.

Trump will run as a duly elected President who's been "impeached" by a Democratic Party that's grossly abused it's power in the House! With each passing day it becomes more and more obvious that this was NEVER about protecting the country from a President who poses a national security threat! With each passing day it become more and more obvious that this was ALWAYS about a Democratic Party that has no viable candidates to run and an agenda that the voters don't agree with!

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

 

[Mike473]

Trump will run as a duly elected President who's been "impeached" by a Democratic Party that's grossly abused it's power in the House! With each passing day it becomes more and more obvious that this was NEVER about protecting the country from a President who poses a national security threat! With each passing day it become more and more obvious that this was ALWAYS about a Democratic Party that has no viable candidates to run and an agenda that the voters don't agree with!

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

Trump will run as a duly elected President who's been "impeached" by a Democratic Party that's grossly abused it's power in the House! With each passing day it becomes more and more obvious that this was NEVER about protecting the country from a President who poses a national security threat! With each passing day it become more and more obvious that this was ALWAYS about a Democratic Party that has no viable candidates to run and an agenda that the voters don't agree with!

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

 

[Circe]

Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe may be the architect of this strategy of withholding the Articles of Impeachment for favorable Senate terms for a fair trial.

Professor Laurence Tribe is a first-rank Trump hater. He wrote a book, or let the young man he has......fallen under the influence of ……. write a book with his name on it about impeachment. Unfortunately I wasted the price of that book, which turned out to be anti-Trump vitriol of the most disgusting kind.

So you could be right about him consulting on how to stick it to Trump the worst.

And ---- congrats, Lakhota, you were right yesterday when you said a delay would be USED by the Dems, and you were the first to have this idea that I saw; it's been on the TV news all day today.

 

[Olde Europe]

Pelosi now owns McConnell

Rather than say this is a serious issue and that he will provide a fair and impartial trial, he has proclaimed he is not impartial and is coordinating the proceedings with the White House

Gives her a reason to withhold sending Articles of Impeachmment to an admitted sham trial

What nonsense. If she hasn't handed over the Articles immediately after the Holiday recess, mid-January at the latest, she's going to look ridiculous, and that's not usually described as "she owns McConnell." Moreover, she said she's looking toward the rules Schumer and McConnell negotiate, then determine the managers, and hand over the articles. If she drags that out any further, she'll stand before the electorate as a scheming liar.

Pelosi has a sense for this serious moment in U.S. history. She'll act accordingly. Why can't you?

 

[Lakhota]

Trump is the first U.S. president to be impeached in his FIRST TERM.

 

[Olde Europe]

The first totally partisan impeachment in history.

Yes, and you should be completely disheartened and embarrassed by that.

Facing overwhelming evidence for Trump's brazen corruption, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to condemn it.

Moreover, despite Trump's belittling and unconstitutional emasculation of a co-equal branch of government, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to stand up for the institution in which they proudly serve, and condemn Trump.

That was yesterday's finding, and it's even more devastating than what the investigation into Trump's Mob Boss government revealed.

Then to turn around and to blame Democrats for the Republicans' lack of moral fiber and spine, should count as the new definition of "chutzpah".

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

 

[Oldstyle]

The first totally partisan impeachment in history.

Yes, and you should be completely disheartened and embarrassed by that.

Facing overwhelming evidence for Trump's brazen corruption, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to condemn it.

Moreover, despite Trump's belittling and unconstitutional emasculation of a co-equal branch of government, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to stand up for the institution in which they proudly serve, and condemn Trump.

That was yesterday's finding, and it's even more devastating than what the investigation into Trump's Mob Boss government revealed.

Then to turn around and to blame Democrats for the Republicans' lack of moral fiber and spine, should count as the new definition of "chutzpah".

Overwhelming evidence of brazen corruption? Seriously? He asked the President of the Ukraine to look into apparent corruption between the Biden family and Burisma. The "corruption" isn't from Trump...he's the one asking the authorities to look INTO apparent corruption! Does it suck for Joe Biden that he's been exposed at what he and his son have been doing? Yeah it does! It probably cost him whatever slim chance he had at getting the Democratic nomination! Does that mean he should have gotten a "pass" on what he and his son were doing? Why? Because he's running for office? That let's you be corrupt but untouchable? This isn't Trump doing a Hillary and paying someone to fabricate lies about his opponent. This is a President of the United States who was concerned about Quid Pro Quo between a previous administration's Vice President and the Ukraine.

 

[Polishprince]

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

 

[Lakhota]

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

 

[Polishprince]

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

Mr. Turtle gave a tremendous speech today, and our President is still ruling our nation and having a tremendous time doing it.

Nothing further will happen, in regards to impeachment, unless and until Pelosi forwards the articles.

 

[Lakhota]

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

Mr. Turtle gave a tremendous speech today, and our President is still ruling our nation and having a tremendous time doing it.

Nothing further will happen, in regards to impeachment, unless and until Pelosi forwards the articles.

Trump is reportedly unhinged that Speaker Pelosi is holding the Articles of Impeachment. Trump wants a speedy SHAM trial.

 

[Polishprince]

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

Mr. Turtle gave a tremendous speech today, and our President is still ruling our nation and having a tremendous time doing it.

Nothing further will happen, in regards to impeachment, unless and until Pelosi forwards the articles.

Trump is reportedly unhinged that Speaker Pelosi is holding the Articles of Impeachment. Trump wants a speedy SHAM trial.

Trump didn't sound "unhinged" at all on Twitter, or at his tremendous speech last night.

My guess is the report you may have read was more "wishful thinking" than anything else. President Trump wants a fair trial where he will be able to confront his accusers- if any. Considering the fact that there are no actual non-hearsay witnesses who have come forward, the trial is bound to be "speedy".

BTW, Trump is actually entitled to a speedy trial according to the Constitution.

 

[Lakhota]

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

Mr. Turtle gave a tremendous speech today, and our President is still ruling our nation and having a tremendous time doing it.

Nothing further will happen, in regards to impeachment, unless and until Pelosi forwards the articles.

Trump is reportedly unhinged that Speaker Pelosi is holding the Articles of Impeachment. Trump wants a speedy SHAM trial.

Trump didn't sound "unhinged" at all on Twitter, or at his tremendous speech last night.

My guess is the report you may have read was more "wishful thinking" than anything else. President Trump wants a fair trial where he will be able to confront his accusers- if any. Considering the fact that there are no actual non-hearsay witnesses who have come forward, the trial is bound to be "speedy".

BTW, Trump is actually entitled to a speedy trial according to the Constitution.

Speedy trial? No, not according to impeachment in the Constitution - especially after McConnell has publicly stated that it would be a SHAM trial. Stay tuned...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump will run as a duly elected President who's been "impeached" by a Democratic Party that's grossly abused it's power in the House! With each passing day it becomes more and more obvious that this was NEVER about protecting the country from a President who poses a national security threat! With each passing day it become more and more obvious that this was ALWAYS about a Democratic Party that has no viable candidates to run and an agenda that the voters don't agree with!

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

The citation given has nothing to do with abuse of power.

The democommiecrats mishandled the whole thing.

 

[Polishprince]

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Funny. Speaker Pelosi has McConnell and Trump shitting bricks.

Mr. Turtle gave a tremendous speech today, and our President is still ruling our nation and having a tremendous time doing it.

Nothing further will happen, in regards to impeachment, unless and until Pelosi forwards the articles.

Trump is reportedly unhinged that Speaker Pelosi is holding the Articles of Impeachment. Trump wants a speedy SHAM trial.

Trump didn't sound "unhinged" at all on Twitter, or at his tremendous speech last night.

My guess is the report you may have read was more "wishful thinking" than anything else. President Trump wants a fair trial where he will be able to confront his accusers- if any. Considering the fact that there are no actual non-hearsay witnesses who have come forward, the trial is bound to be "speedy".

BTW, Trump is actually entitled to a speedy trial according to the Constitution.

Speedy trial? No, not according to impeachment in the Constitution - especially after McConnell has publicly stated that it would be a SHAM trial. Stay tuned...

Actually, Sen. McConnell wants a fair trial,where the rights of the Defendant will be scrupulous honored.

Especially after the defendant had no input into the House hearings.


BTW, very few, if any of the witnesses presented in the House will be allowed to testify. Hearsay isn't allowed in trials.

 

[Faun]

The first totally partisan impeachment in history.

Yes, and you should be completely disheartened and embarrassed by that.

Facing overwhelming evidence for Trump's brazen corruption, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to condemn it.

Moreover, despite Trump's belittling and unconstitutional emasculation of a co-equal branch of government, not one Republican in the House found it in himself to stand up for the institution in which they proudly serve, and condemn Trump.

That was yesterday's finding, and it's even more devastating than what the investigation into Trump's Mob Boss government revealed.

Then to turn around and to blame Democrats for the Republicans' lack of moral fiber and spine, should count as the new definition of "chutzpah".

Overwhelming evidence of brazen corruption? Seriously? He asked the President of the Ukraine to look into apparent corruption between the Biden family and Burisma. The "corruption" isn't from Trump...he's the one asking the authorities to look INTO apparent corruption! Does it suck for Joe Biden that he's been exposed at what he and his son have been doing? Yeah it does! It probably cost him whatever slim chance he had at getting the Democratic nomination! Does that mean he should have gotten a "pass" on what he and his son were doing? Why? Because he's running for office? That let's you be corrupt but untouchable? This isn't Trump doing a Hillary and paying someone to fabricate lies about his opponent. This is a President of the United States who was concerned about Quid Pro Quo between a previous administration's Vice President and the Ukraine.

Thanks for admitting this attack on Biden probably cost him his shot at the White House. That was always Impeached Trump's goal from the start and now even you admit Impeached Trump may have succeeded.

And because Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to do his dirty work, Impeached Trump is now impeached. That legacy will endure the remainder of this country.

 

[Faun]

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Unfortunately for the libs, there is no proof that Ukraine or its distinguished president made any contribution to Trump's campaign at all.

The libs are only inferring that that what Zelensky and Trump were in understanding of during their phone call.

But both parties to the call deny such an arrangement, and there is proof otherwise.

Moron, Zelensky didn't have to make any contribution of any kind for Trump to break the law. Just asking Zelensky to investigate Biden was sufficient.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

You won't find 67 members of the Senate that agree. And that is all that matters. This is all show.

No worries. As of now, the Senate is irrelevant.

Actually, the Senate is very busy with their judicial confirmations. Pelosi is doing them a favor as not sending over the articles saves them the hassle of even dealing with it.

Thanks. It's refreshing to see someone on the right acknowledging Pelosi's fine work.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Poor Trump. Broke the law and got impeached. Poor guy, he's always the victim.

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

The citation given has nothing to do with abuse of power.

The democommiecrats mishandled the whole thing.

Of course it does. Using the office of president to solicit a foreign leader to dig for dirt into a political rival and interfere with our elections is an abuse of power. Even our Founding Fathers warned against such traitorous behavior.

 

[Polishprince]

What law? Could you cite the code section or statute?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

There is nothing true about this which is why this charge has never been brought.

LOLOL

That's why he was impeached in article I, abuse of power. Haven't you been paying attention?

The citation given has nothing to do with abuse of power.

The democommiecrats mishandled the whole thing.

Of course it does. Using the office of president to solicit a foreign leader to dig for dirt into a political rival and interfere with our elections is an abuse of power. Even our Founding Fathers warned against such traitorous behavior.

But that's not what happened. President Trump discussed battling corruption with President Zelensky. Zelensky admitted there was no quid, no pro or no quo. The Z man was under no pressure whatsoever to deliver anything.