Winning: EPA Swamp Being Drained

[bripat9643]

Shitforbrains thinks steam is bad for the environment.

Sure moron....that's "steam" that those sweethearts are pouting out to improve fuckheads like you complexion..) Please do NOT breed any more nitwits like you.

If you look closely at the photo, you'll notice that the "smoke" is all coming from cooling towers. That means it's water vapor, but you're too much of a dumbass to know things like that.

There are moany chemical processes that use cooling towers around vapors that are not water to extract that have a higher atomic weight molecules and atoms. I must say that I am looking forward to the Ohio river being on fire 24 hours a day three hundred and sixty five days a year again. There is no such thing as hazardous waste and we need no regulations for it! Oh, ya we do not use temperature and presure in chemestry either!

What the fuck are you babbling about?

 

[KissMy]

Record Ethanol Production Under Trump EPA & Admin

Which results in

More Energy & Lower Gasoline Prices! Ethanol / Gasoline is Below Diesel Price.

Not because we burn food. Ethanol requires more energy to produce than is obtained from it.

Wrong - Polluting Canadian Tar Sands that burns more energy than it creates in the car engine, Not USA Ethanol.

Food / DDG protein is not consumed making ethanol. Only Greenhouse Gas Methane producing Corn Starch that animals belched & farted out are now turned into Ethanol. Ethanol plants produce high protein DDG feed for livestock that produces no-longer produce Methane emissions, because it was removed from their feed & put into gas tanks.

Big Oil Pigs hate Ethanol creating competition forcing down gasoline prices. Ethanol removes Big Oils harmful MTBE from the gasoline & water supply.

Trump pledged to protect ethanol and the biofuel mandate. President Donald Trump intervened personally with the Environmental Protection Agency amid pressure from Republicans who worried the agency was poised to weaken biofuel quotas, three people familiar with the discussions said.

Trump directed EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to back off any changes that would dilute a federal mandate for biofuel use, the people said. A top EPA official said Trump’s urging was unnecessary because Pruitt wasn’t planning on weakening the mandate.

Nevertheless, the agency was told by the White House to drop two changes that were under consideration: a possible reduction in biodiesel requirements and a proposal to allow exported renewable fuel to count toward domestic quotas.

 

[jillian]

How President Trump and the EPA's Scott Pruitt are making America's environment deadly again

How President Trump and the EPA's Scott Pruitt are making America's environment deadly again

Trump cult: that’s what we voted for.

Not we. Them

 

[jillian]

Shitforbrains thinks steam is bad for the environment.

Sure moron....that's "steam" that those sweethearts are pouting out to improve fuckheads like you complexion..) Please do NOT breed any more nitwits like you.

If you look closely at the photo, you'll notice that the "smoke" is all coming from cooling towers. That means it's water vapor, but you're too much of a dumbass to know things like that.

There are moany chemical processes that use cooling towers around vapors that are not water to extract that have a higher atomic weight molecules and atoms. I must say that I am looking forward to the Ohio river being on fire 24 hours a day three hundred and sixty five days a year again. There is no such thing as hazardous waste and we need no regulations for it! Oh, ya we do not use temperature and presure in chemestry either!

What the fuck are you babbling about?

Quiet you illiterate imbecile

 

[LaDexter]

Jillian is still a card carrying member of the Hillary CULT.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Record Ethanol Production Under Trump EPA & Admin

Which results in

More Energy & Lower Gasoline Prices! Ethanol / Gasoline is Below Diesel Price.

Not because we burn food. Ethanol requires more energy to produce than is obtained from it.

Wrong - Polluting Canadian Tar Sands that burns more energy than it creates in the car engine, Not USA Ethanol.

Food / DDG protein is not consumed making ethanol. Only Greenhouse Gas Methane producing Corn Starch that animals belched & farted out are now turned into Ethanol. Ethanol plants produce high protein DDG feed for livestock that produces no-longer produce Methane emissions, because it was removed from their feed & put into gas tanks.

Big Oil Pigs hate Ethanol creating competition forcing down gasoline prices. Ethanol removes Big Oils harmful MTBE from the gasoline & water supply.

Trump pledged to protect ethanol and the biofuel mandate. President Donald Trump intervened personally with the Environmental Protection Agency amid pressure from Republicans who worried the agency was poised to weaken biofuel quotas, three people familiar with the discussions said.

Trump directed EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to back off any changes that would dilute a federal mandate for biofuel use, the people said. A top EPA official said Trump’s urging was unnecessary because Pruitt wasn’t planning on weakening the mandate.

Nevertheless, the agency was told by the White House to drop two changes that were under consideration: a possible reduction in biodiesel requirements and a proposal to allow exported renewable fuel to count toward domestic quotas.

Obviously you have no clue to farming and growing corn. You just read Leftist BS and parrot it.

 

[jillian]

Jillian is still a card carrying member of the Hillary CULT.

I am not a member of any cult. Unless of course one believes that it's a cult to not want imbeciles doing destructive things to our country.

Now you want to talk about cuts, trumptard? Now THAT is a cult.

Loon

 

[jillian]

Record Ethanol Production Under Trump EPA & Admin

Which results in

More Energy & Lower Gasoline Prices! Ethanol / Gasoline is Below Diesel Price.

Not because we burn food. Ethanol requires more energy to produce than is obtained from it.

Wrong - Polluting Canadian Tar Sands that burns more energy than it creates in the car engine, Not USA Ethanol.

Food / DDG protein is not consumed making ethanol. Only Greenhouse Gas Methane producing Corn Starch that animals belched & farted out are now turned into Ethanol. Ethanol plants produce high protein DDG feed for livestock that produces no-longer produce Methane emissions, because it was removed from their feed & put into gas tanks.

Big Oil Pigs hate Ethanol creating competition forcing down gasoline prices. Ethanol removes Big Oils harmful MTBE from the gasoline & water supply.

Trump pledged to protect ethanol and the biofuel mandate. President Donald Trump intervened personally with the Environmental Protection Agency amid pressure from Republicans who worried the agency was poised to weaken biofuel quotas, three people familiar with the discussions said.

Trump directed EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to back off any changes that would dilute a federal mandate for biofuel use, the people said. A top EPA official said Trump’s urging was unnecessary because Pruitt wasn’t planning on weakening the mandate.

Nevertheless, the agency was told by the White House to drop two changes that were under consideration: a possible reduction in biodiesel requirements and a proposal to allow exported renewable fuel to count toward domestic quotas.

Obviously you have no clue to farming and growing corn. You just read Leftist BS and parrot it.

You've proven you don't know anything. Rightwingnut swampdwellet

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

It's the exact opposite, retard.

No, it's not. Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to. Now they can use satallite imagery and computer controlled application to apply more fertizer in areas that need it and less in areas that don't.

You're just a fool who doesn't know the slightest thing about modern technology or farming.

Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to.

Except they obviously do, dope.
If they do like you say,( which is what they should do),then their crops must be doing very poorly if they're losing so much to run off.

You have the logic skills of a turnip.

 

[bripat9643]

Shitforbrains thinks steam is bad for the environment.

Sure moron....that's "steam" that those sweethearts are pouting out to improve fuckheads like you complexion..) Please do NOT breed any more nitwits like you.

If you look closely at the photo, you'll notice that the "smoke" is all coming from cooling towers. That means it's water vapor, but you're too much of a dumbass to know things like that.

There are moany chemical processes that use cooling towers around vapors that are not water to extract that have a higher atomic weight molecules and atoms. I must say that I am looking forward to the Ohio river being on fire 24 hours a day three hundred and sixty five days a year again. There is no such thing as hazardous waste and we need no regulations for it! Oh, ya we do not use temperature and presure in chemestry either!

What the fuck are you babbling about?

Quiet you illiterate imbecile

ROFL!

 

[RealDave]

We didn't have this problem fifty years ago.
It's come with the over-use and often indiscriminate application of chemicals.

How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?

Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

 

[bripat9643]

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

It's the exact opposite, retard.

No, it's not. Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to. Now they can use satallite imagery and computer controlled application to apply more fertizer in areas that need it and less in areas that don't.

You're just a fool who doesn't know the slightest thing about modern technology or farming.

Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to.

Except they obviously do, dope.
If they do like you say,( which is what they should do),then their crops must be doing very poorly if they're losing so much to run off.

You have the logic skills of a turnip.

Your theory that efficient use of fertilizer would eliminate agricultural runoff is obvious bullshit. Apparently you believe farmers want to waste money by applying too much. You simply spout off without any actual knowledge of mordern farming proactices. You're an ignoramus and a hooligan.

 

[bripat9643]

How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?

Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

Prove it, asshole.

 

[Weatherman2020]

How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?

Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

Because more crops are grown than 50 years ago, Dufus. Fertilizer and pesticides cost money. I know this is a news flash for you, but it’s true. Farmers are in the business to make money, not waste it.

 

[bripat9643]

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

It's the exact opposite, retard.

No, it's not. Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to. Now they can use satallite imagery and computer controlled application to apply more fertizer in areas that need it and less in areas that don't.

You're just a fool who doesn't know the slightest thing about modern technology or farming.

Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to.

Except they obviously do, dope.
If they do like you say,( which is what they should do),then their crops must be doing very poorly if they're losing so much to run off.

You have the logic skills of a turnip.

More bloviating with no actual facts.

 

[Rambunctious]

Who needs scientists in the EPA?

Remove government grants and watch the scientists return...right now all we have there are well educated government tit suckers...get the government and politics out of science...

 

[bripat9643]

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

It's the exact opposite, retard.

No, it's not. Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to. Now they can use satallite imagery and computer controlled application to apply more fertizer in areas that need it and less in areas that don't.

You're just a fool who doesn't know the slightest thing about modern technology or farming.

Farmers don't want to use more fertiziler than they absolutely need to.

Except they obviously do, dope.
If they do like you say,( which is what they should do),then their crops must be doing very poorly if they're losing so much to run off.

You have the logic skills of a turnip.

Variable Rate Technology — Agricultural and Farm Machinery

 

[bripat9643]

Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

Because more crops are grown than 50 years ago, Dufus. Fertilizer and pesticides cost money. I know this is a news flash for you, but it’s true. Farmers are in the business to make money, not waste it.

A lot of those additional crops are corn grown to make ethanol.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.

furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

Because more crops are grown than 50 years ago, Dufus. Fertilizer and pesticides cost money. I know this is a news flash for you, but it’s true. Farmers are in the business to make money, not waste it.

A lot of those additional crops are corn grown to make ethanol.

Yep. Which require fresh water, fertilizer and pesticides.

 

[bripat9643]

You're a fucking moron. Agriculture is far different than it was 50 years ago.

Yeah, it probably uses less chemical fertilizers now than it did 50 years ago.

So, you are bloviating here & having a fit because "probably".

Wow.

More fertilizer is used today than 50 years ago.

Because more crops are grown than 50 years ago, Dufus. Fertilizer and pesticides cost money. I know this is a news flash for you, but it’s true. Farmers are in the business to make money, not waste it.

A lot of those additional crops are corn grown to make ethanol.

Yep. Which require fresh water, fertilizer and pesticides.

The environmental wackos are supporting the very thing they claim to hate.