Women want to be treated equally.....

[Bonzi]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

 

[danielpalos]

Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

Not a moot point at all. Just a rehashing of what I have already said.

And yes, we have regulations on capitalism. And we should have one more to require equal pay for equal work.

what happened to supply and demand?

Nothing happened to supply and demand. Hiring two people and paying one more, when all else is equal, does not fall under supply & demand. Unless you want to contend that men in the work place are rare?

if, supply and demand, were equal, why do you believe labor would not be paid equal?

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

Not a moot point at all. Just a rehashing of what I have already said.

And yes, we have regulations on capitalism. And we should have one more to require equal pay for equal work.

what happened to supply and demand?

Nothing happened to supply and demand. Hiring two people and paying one more, when all else is equal, does not fall under supply & demand. Unless you want to contend that men in the work place are rare?

if, supply and demand, were equal, why do you believe labor would not be paid equal?

Because management can get away with it.

 

[danielpalos]

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

 

[danielpalos]

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

 

[danielpalos]

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

 

[WinterBorn]

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

 

[Bonzi]

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

that... is not going to happen! if that is designed to shut me up ... well done!

 

[WinterBorn]

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

 

[WinterBorn]

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

Why don't you go back and read your own post about military doctrine. And then admit that it was a lie?

 

[danielpalos]

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

 

[danielpalos]

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

Why don't you go back and read your own post about military doctrine. And then admit that it was a lie?

It wasn't any lie; you have nothing but fallacy that is all. stop projecting.

The Romans proved it with the lead up to Cannae.

 

[WinterBorn]

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

 

[WinterBorn]

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

Why don't you go back and read your own post about military doctrine. And then admit that it was a lie?

It wasn't any lie; you have nothing but fallacy that is all. stop projecting.

The Romans proved it with the lead up to Cannae.

There have been numerous examples of a superior force using guile. And you have not shown one single nation's military that has a doctrine such as you described. It was a lie. It may have been ignorance at the beginning, but it became a lie.

 

[WinterBorn]

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

 

[danielpalos]

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

 

[danielpalos]

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

what made it so lousy? or what is/was lousy about the service you received?

go back and read your posts to me, from Inception.

Why don't you go back and read your own post about military doctrine. And then admit that it was a lie?

It wasn't any lie; you have nothing but fallacy that is all. stop projecting.

The Romans proved it with the lead up to Cannae.

There have been numerous examples of a superior force using guile. And you have not shown one single nation's military that has a doctrine such as you described. It was a lie. It may have been ignorance at the beginning, but it became a lie.

no, there haven't; all used guile due to a lack of superior force; force concentration is speculation, not true superiority.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

 

[WinterBorn]

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.