Women want to be treated equally.....

[Bonzi]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

 

[danielpalos]

Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.

Thank you for being clueless.

I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.

Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?

Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?

Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?


In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.

Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.

Not even close to what I said.

Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

 

[Bonzi]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

 

[WinterBorn]

Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?

Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?

And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.

Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.

Thank you for being clueless.

I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.

Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?

Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?

Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?


In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.

Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?

Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

 

[WinterBorn]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

 

[danielpalos]

Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.

Thank you for being clueless.

I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.

Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?

Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?

Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?


In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.

Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?

Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

 

[WinterBorn]

Thank you for being clueless.

I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.

Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?

Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?

Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?


In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.

Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.

Not even close to what I said.

Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

Not a moot point at all. Just a rehashing of what I have already said.

And yes, we have regulations on capitalism. And we should have one more to require equal pay for equal work.

 

[WinterBorn]

Thank you for being clueless.

I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.

Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?

Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?

Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?


In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.

Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?

Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

 

[Bonzi]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.

Not even close to what I said.

Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

Not a moot point at all. Just a rehashing of what I have already said.

And yes, we have regulations on capitalism. And we should have one more to require equal pay for equal work.

what happened to supply and demand?

 

[danielpalos]

Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?

Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

 

[WinterBorn]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

some do........ it's wrong to say otherwise.....

i would quibble that we cannot make women feel the same; but only the way our perspective feels may be the same.

why not be more equal, and enable men to feel like women, with all of the other ones as well, by analogy?

I'm just saying your rules don't apply to me personally (even when I was single)

why not; all you and your crew did with me is give me lousy client relations for free.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

 

[WinterBorn]

Not even close to what I said.

Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.

Yes it does. But I never said I didn't have faith that capitalism worked. I said I did not have faith that unregulated capitalism would not exploit or do harm while it works.

moot point, mr.diversion, we don't have unregulated capitalism.

Not a moot point at all. Just a rehashing of what I have already said.

And yes, we have regulations on capitalism. And we should have one more to require equal pay for equal work.

what happened to supply and demand?

Nothing happened to supply and demand. Hiring two people and paying one more, when all else is equal, does not fall under supply & demand. Unless you want to contend that men in the work place are rare?

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.

The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.

Absolutely wrong. You project that blowjobs translate across the board in any industry. That is the fallacy. Sex is the product in porn. It is NOT the product in the non-porn sector. So you are simply wrong again.

In porn, the woman IS the product. It is about her having sex. The men are props. The majority of customers for straight porn are straight men. They don't care about the guys in porn. They want it for the women. Women and Sex are the product in straight porn. The same is not true in an assembly line type job.

Dear, sex is porn; live or digital. yes, dear, sex for favors also happens in the allegedly, non-porn sector.

I am sure it does. But the fact that it happens is very different than saying that women would be paid equally if they gave more blowjobs.

dear, would women make less, if they engaged in porn, in the non-porn sector?

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

 

[WinterBorn]

Daniel just wants women to feel the same way men do......
Like we should all be equal and exactly the same....

I could claim it is the equality of socialism, but that would be a fallacy of false Cause; I don't want women to feel the same as men; i merely prefer it when women actually practice what they preach.

No you don't. You have already stated (and defended stating it) that in order for you to accept that women truly want equality, they have to come up to men and ask to be used. Practicing what they preach would be treating everyone equally. For you equality is only possible for single, straight, sexually active women. Any other women are just out of luck.

dear, it is about equality; i have no problem asking women for sex online or in person; but, for women complaining about men flapping their gums for the sake of honesty instead of just lies, like shills for poon.

If it were about equality, it would be available to all women. Not just the ones who submit to being used.

informed consent is more social than a secret, bottom line.

Whatever nonsense you want to spout, your statement shows that only single, hetero, sexually active women are allowed to have equality, in your opinion. Any woman who is in a relationship, not interested in sex, or not interested in sex with men will not be seen as serious about equality. And THAT is simply sick. It is certainly not honest.