Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?nope; that is a fallacy of composition.Of course I know what it means. And using a very specialized, customer specific segment to make generalized assumptions about an entire economic system is laughable.
The private sector cannot be wrong about that which it generates; Only the public sector can be wrong about private sector metrics.
The private sector can certainly be wrong. If the company knowingly puts out a dangerous product, if it puts its employees in danger, if it practices discriminatory hiring, or if it violates labor laws it is wrong. And the bottom line does not justify any of that.
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?nope; that is a fallacy of composition.
The private sector cannot be wrong about that which it generates; Only the public sector can be wrong about private sector metrics.
The private sector can certainly be wrong. If the company knowingly puts out a dangerous product, if it puts its employees in danger, if it practices discriminatory hiring, or if it violates labor laws it is wrong. And the bottom line does not justify any of that.
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?The private sector can certainly be wrong. If the company knowingly puts out a dangerous product, if it puts its employees in danger, if it practices discriminatory hiring, or if it violates labor laws it is wrong. And the bottom line does not justify any of that.
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?The private sector can certainly be wrong. If the company knowingly puts out a dangerous product, if it puts its employees in danger, if it practices discriminatory hiring, or if it violates labor laws it is wrong. And the bottom line does not justify any of that.
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.Why do you believe the socialism of equality is to be preferred to the discrimination of capitalism? Don't you believe in Capitalism?
I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.I don't believe either one, on its own, is best.
Why don't you believe that two people, doing the exact same work (all things being equal) should be paid the same?
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.
I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?that is the whole point; they are being paid a market based wage.
If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?
I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?If two people are working side by side on an assembly line, and both have been there roughly the same length of time, how does paying one less make it market based? The fact that one is female does not make the work performed any different.dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.I can site an example of a company that routinely starts women off at $2 less an hour. In 2003 the cable tv construction industry collapsed. Charter stock went to below $1 per share. I was laid off. I took a job at a cabinet making plant in a small town in eat Alabama. I was cautioned not to discuss my pay. I was hired at $12 an hour. The girl working alongside me on the line was making $9 an hour. I was given a written reprimand for discussing my pay when she complained. She had been working there for 2 years. But since there were few jobs in the area, no one wanted to make waves and risk losing their job. Luckily, after working there about 4 months, I was called back to my other job.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.i am not sure; can you cite any examples in, for example, "piece work" industries that simply need to fill quotas?dear, not everyone starts at the same rate in all sectors. what they made in a previous Firms has some effect on market value in the present.
thus, you begin with a false premise.
Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.Says the guy who uses the porn industry as his standard.
If your work at previous firms was relevant at all, yes it would have an effect. But since this didn't it wouldn't. Nothing on my resume was relevant to assembly line work.
Once again, why do two people who do the same work (all things being equal) make different amounts?
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?why not; mr.diversion? one incident is just that, anecdotal.
You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Not even close to what I said.
Shoulda just made the point women wanna be treated equally to men up until a draft yanks them in to fight a war, or a man hits them. Then they're women and a protected sex.
Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?You asked for an example. I gave one. I did not say it represented anything except an example of one company.
And yet, there is ample evidence that my experience is not unique.
Why will you not answer a simple question? If two people are doing the exact same work, all things being equal, why should one make more than the other?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Dear, Capitalism works regardless of your Faith in it; it is socialism that requires social morals for free.Yes, you admitted that women in the non-porn sector make less because they don't give enough blow jobs to make up for it.Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Not even close to what I said.
The narrow confines of porn is just special pleading; the only suckers around don't have Faith in Capitalism under our form of capitalism.Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?Thank you for explaining why women make less in the non-porn sector.I am not claiming they should. Can you explain why guys make less in the porn sector for doing equivalent work?
Sure I can. It is simple Supply & Demand. How hard is it to get a woman to fuck? How hard to get a man?
Plus, look at the customer base. For straight porn, males are the overwhelming majority of customers. What do they want to see?
And lastly, it is a matter of who will suck a cock. Men in gay porn make more too.
Thank you for being clueless.
I have used assembly line workers as my example throughout this thread.
Please tell me why you think it is harder to get men to work on an assembly line than women?
Please tell me why the gender of the worker on the assembly line effects the final product?
Please tell me why you think assembly line work is the equivalent of a blowjob?
In other words, my explanation of why women make more in porn does not explain anything in the non-porn sector.
Yes, within the narrow confines of the porn sector. If you think that translates to women needing to give blowjobs in the workplace in order to be paid the same as men, you are a sick fucker.
